Sentences with phrase «less variation when»

There was less variation when I looked at the most popular articles.

Not exact matches

When it introduced two vegetarian wraps last summer — Sante Fe and Mediterranean — the initial plan was to retire the less popular variation in favour of another option.

Hi Clare, well hope you have fun experimenting with a few different variations and you find these can satisfy that cereal bar craving when it hits (with a lot less sugar!).

Nope, everything is simply a variation of normal and doctors are too stupid to know their a $ $ from a hole in the ground, much less to dispute a sanctimommy's notion of when she is in labor.

When rabbits were domesticated, around 100 regions of their genome changed to make them less fearful, but the variations are not fixed

While there are numerous variations of the kettlebell swing, the muscles that are affected when performing these any of these variants are more or less the same.

The extra compliance is welcome when the time comes to navigate something less smooth than the German autobahn, such as secondary Italian roads dotted with drastic camber variations, impromptu transverse ridges, and frost - bitten shoulders.

The Ibiza Cupra was priced slightly lower than the period Polo GTI, but less impressive resale values means this variation is bigger now than when the Cupra was new.

Common to all variations of the breed is an unmistakable sound that didn't change dramatically when the air - cooled boxer was replaced by the water - cooled engine in late 1997; a less - than - ideal weight distribution combined with a high polar moment of inertia; compromised packaging with little room for luggage; and a driving experience dominated by phenomenal grip and traction — while it lasted.

When a Nintendo game seems promising, we already know by at least the 2nd trailer (3D World, Smash 4...) This game has less than a month missing and we only got 2 trailers and 5 variations of the same court.

I have observed greater variations in Arctic Inversions lately, the tendency is towards less steep inversions, this is expected when the Arctic lower atmosphere warms during winter, if the models maintain a stronger inversion while its observed weakening this may explain why sea ice models fail, strong boundary layers appear to be collapsing.

The actual prevailing view of the paleoclimate research community that emerged during the early 1990s, when long - term proxy data became more widely available and it was possible to synthesize them into estimates of large - scale temperature changes in past centuries, was that the average temperature over the Northern Hemisphere varied by significantly less than 1 degree C in previous centuries (i.e., the variations in past centuries were small compared to the observed 20th century warming).

This factor, when multiplied times the amount of reduction in tropospheric aerosol emissions, between 1975 and another later year will give the average global temperature for that year (per NASA's J - D land - ocean temperature index values) to within less than a tenth of a degree C. of actuality (when temporary natural variations due to El Nino's, La Nina's, and volcanic eruptions are accounted for).

Then the temperatures stay there, varying by less than a degree with hardly any year - to - year variation at all, up to about 1880, when the dotted line become solid — indicating (though this is not explicitly noted) that we have switched to modern thermometer measurements — at which point they begin to tick jerkily upward.

In other words, of the possible variation which Curry first suggests, off of the extreme reading that the «could be» one end of the equation = - the one that just happens to have the maximum plausible natural variability that the IPCC could even reasonably conceive, in Curry's estimation, be exactly what the natural variability here in fact IS, but then from there goes extreme again, and concludes that within her own plus minus 20 % range — guess what — IT ALSO goes in the extreme direction, away from the mean of natural variability averaging out and the change we see is our influence (which assuredly it is not, but the point is it is impossible to pinpoint any small range, though Curry here does it anyway) so that in effect IT IS 50 % to 60 % (or 70 % when she adds on that «anthropogenic is 50 % or less.

Particularly when these events are much less dire than extremes we have already seen through natural variations over the last century.

Presumably if we did a 40 year smoothing on the temperature record of the last 100 years it would show a lot less variation than when we show the data in an annual form — but would it mean missing out a lot of the useful information and giving a misleading impression?

If that were the case, then there is a better than 1 in six chance that when natural factors equalize out in the long term (which is more or less inevitable, and certainly so for internal variations), we will be facing 50 % greater than IPCC expected warming.