Essentially, the extra income lets retirees avoid selling securities during down markets; with
less volatility risk, the nest egg is likely to last longer.
Not exact matches
Risk is one reason there's such emphasis on investing when you're young — young people have a long time horizon before retirement, which means they can worry
less about short - term
volatility.
If policy developments in advanced economies make the path for growth and debt
less benign than expected,
risk premiums and
volatility could rise sharply.
International investing involves
risks, including
risks related to foreign currency, limited liquidity,
less government regulation and the possibility of substantial
volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments.
For those countries that are
less far along in this transition, policy still reveals a substantial degree of ambivalence about the benefits of integration; and doubts about their ability to limit the
risks in greater exposure to
volatility.
Although bonds generally present
less short - term
risk and
volatility than stocks, bonds do contain interest rate
risk (as interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa) and the
risk of default, or the
risk that an issuer will be unable to make income or principal payments.
For the rest, a better approach may be seeking more modest returns with lower
volatility, via a focus on portfolio construction,
risk exposures and
less traditional asset classes.
If you are a long - term investor and believe the company has fundamental value — think Google (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN) or Facebook — then the early
volatility and the
risk of price drops are of
less concern.
In this environment of increased uncertainty, I predict that minimum
volatility strategies will re-enter the spotlight as a way for investors to maintain equity exposure while seeking
less risk.
Dividend stocks offer consistent cash flow and potentially
less volatility for investors with a lower
risk tolerance.
They entail significant
risks that can include losses due to leveraging or other speculative investment practices, lack of liquidity,
volatility of returns, restrictions on transferring interests in a fund, potential lack of diversification, absence and / or delay of information regarding valuations and pricing, complex tax structures and delays in tax reporting,
less regulation and higher fees than mutual funds.
High
Risk — Income (H / INC) Medium to higher risk equities of companies that are structured with a focus on providing a meaningful dividend but may face less predictable earnings (or losses), more leveraged balance sheets, rapidly changing market dynamics, financial and competitive issues, higher price volatility (beta), and potential risk of princi
Risk — Income (H / INC) Medium to higher
risk equities of companies that are structured with a focus on providing a meaningful dividend but may face less predictable earnings (or losses), more leveraged balance sheets, rapidly changing market dynamics, financial and competitive issues, higher price volatility (beta), and potential risk of princi
risk equities of companies that are structured with a focus on providing a meaningful dividend but may face
less predictable earnings (or losses), more leveraged balance sheets, rapidly changing market dynamics, financial and competitive issues, higher price
volatility (beta), and potential
risk of princi
risk of principal.
Given term premium suppression (via QE) reduced
volatility and induced investors to buy risky assets to boost returns, a sustained rise in long - term interest rates would give investors more options to achieve yield targets, thus making
risk assets appear
less attractive and ultimately erode demands for yield and tighten financial conditions.
For the rest, a better approach may be seeking more modest returns with lower
volatility, via a focus on portfolio construction,
risk exposures and
less traditional asset classes.
With U.S. stocks still flirting with their all - time highs and
volatility scraping along close to a multi-year low, investors are
less inclined to worry about hedging
risks and downside protection.
Low -
volatility equities Lower -
volatility stock strategies typically experience
less dramatic price changes when the market goes down since fund managers aim for benchmark returns with considerably
less risk.
Fund managers aim to do this by a significant margin over the long - term and aim to deliver returns with
less volatility (
risk) than the broader UK equity market.
For example, if you have a very high tolerance for
risk — perhaps you have a spouse with a full pension so you're
less concerned about stock market
volatility — you might increase the level of equity you hold in your retirement savings.
You'll give up returns and retirement income in order to sleep better at night with
less investment
risk and
volatility.
«Stated differently, there are many academics who would say that buying individual stocks leads to people taking «uncompensated
risks», meaning they could likely get a similar return with a lot
less volatility if they just diversified more — both within and throughout asset classes.»
In general, higher -
risk funds allow for greater returns, while lower -
risk funds typically have lower returns but with much
less volatility.
While covered - call strategies appear to promise «a free lunch» of increased returns with
less risk, investors who care about more than the
volatility of returns will not find this an efficient strategy.
Low
volatility stocks actually tend to outperform — if not earning higher returns, then at least similar returns with
less risk.
This balanced portfolio approach helps insulate you from
risk, as it is
less susceptible to
volatility and your portfolio value doesn't fluctuate as dramatically.
LSV (and Haugen, Montier, and many others since LSV) showed that when using the various proxies for
risk — Beta,
volatility, etc. — they could prove that value stocks exhibited
less volatility than glamour stocks.
Low duration can mean
less volatility or price
risk.
The
risk as measured by the
volatility of the portfolio returns expressed in annualized terms is far
less for dividend paying stocks than it is for non-dividend paying stocks.
If you have any financial goal (s) which is
less than 5 years away, which can be met with 8 % to 10 % rate of return (or) when you are not comfortable with high
volatility (
risk) then you can surely consider investing in Debt Funds.
The subsequent low -
volatility screening is designed so that bonds with
less risk, as demonstrated by their trading pattern, are selected, while duration and credit rating are held equal.
With a sufficiently long time horizon, there is little
risk to stock investing, because the impacts of stock
volatility become
less over time.
There are
risks involved with dividend yield investing strategies, such as the company not paying a dividend or the dividend being far
less than what is anticipated, as well as market
risk, price
volatility, liquidity
risk,
risk of default, and
risk of loss.
My moderate growth and income clients have witnessed
less volatility and have experienced better
risk - adjusted returns with roughly 20 % -30 % cash / cash equivalents since last summer.
The Moderate Countercyclical portfolio is designed for the investor who can stomach fairly large drawdowns, but is looking for
less volatility than stocks while also trying to generate better returns than a static 60/40 portfolio which is virtually guaranteed to expose you to low bond returns and high stock market
risk in the coming 20 years.
These considerations include changes in exchange rates and exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes,
less liquid markets and
less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, foreign government restrictions,
less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, greater
risks associated with counterparties and settlement, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price
volatility.
As a general rule, homes in
less expensive neighborhoods offer the highest current yield potential, but generally come with more
volatility, or
risk, than more affluent neighborhoods.
Investing in emerging markets may involve greater
risks than investing in developed countries, including the possibility of industry concentration, nationalization, taxes and transaction costs, lower trading volumes, and
less liquid securities, resulting in higher
volatility.
Investors who buy a minimum
volatility fund may be looking to harness the power of factors to seek
less risk while maintaining market exposure.
In this environment of increased uncertainty, I predict that minimum
volatility strategies will re-enter the spotlight as a way for investors to maintain equity exposure while seeking
less risk.
Multi-cap Investments include exposure to all market caps, including small and medium capitalization («cap») stocks that generally have a higher
risk of business failure,
lesser liquidity and greater
volatility in market price.
Most of the investors are happy investing in FDs because of very low
volatility, assumed
less risk and fix rate of return which is know at the time of investment.
As public asset classes have become more correlated, the modern portfolio theory investment model has offered investors
less diversification, more
volatility and, ultimately, portfolios with
risk that outmatch potential returns.
These funds typically have lower
risk, lower
volatility, and
less capital gains than other equity funds and can be combined with a number of other types of mutual funds to tweak the investment objective and adjust the
risks and returns.
Jaffe asked about concentration and
volatility risk and Hyman replied that in fact, SMDV's dividend growth strategy has made it
less volatile than the overall small - cap market.
MG: Do you have any studies that show that dividend payers as a group outperform a broad index with
less volatility, which seems to me is saying you can get more reward without taking on more
risk?
That means
less volatility for the fund but it comes with a higher credit
risk.
The
risk of trade restrictions against the backdrop of
less central bank liquidity is contributing to higher
volatility this year.
In fact, in many cases higher
volatility equals
LESS risk.
Foreign securities may be subject to greater
risks than U.S. investments, including currency fluctuations,
less liquid trading markets, greater price
volatility, political and economic instability,
less publicly available information, and changes in tax or currency laws or monetary policy.
The
risks of investing in emerging markets include the
risks of illiquidity, increased price
volatility, smaller market capitalizations,
less government regulation,
less extensive and
less frequent accounting, financial and other reporting requirements,
risk of loss resulting from problems in share registration and custody, substantial economic and political disruptions and the nationalization of foreign deposits or assets.
Bonds generally present
less short - term
risk and
volatility than stocks, but contain interest rate
risk (as interest rates raise, bond prices usually fall), issuer default
risk, issuer credit
risk, liquidity
risk and inflation
risk.