And why would member states
let international organisations get away with such behaviour?
Not exact matches
He said: «The UN treaty, I think is extremely well - meaning naivety on extremely high stilts and it will not contribute to
international safety...
let alone persuade any rogue state or terrorist
organisation to come to the negotiating table tomorrow afternoon.»
But
let me also be clear: it is absurd that
international organisations say we can't use the money to help all those that have been hit by the recent Hurricanes in the British Overseas Territories.
His Lordship emphasised the importance of upholding party choice vis - à - vis the arbitral process — irrespective of the fact that no party has any choice about whether to arbitrate,
let alone decide the composition of the tribunal, when they contract with CSAT; some explain this on the basis that CSAT is a special case, being a tribunal of an
international organisation.