Sentences with phrase «let me explain by»

Let me explain myself by an example.

Let me explain by example, because truly this is a magnificent compendium for anyone interested in being creative in the kitchen or simply eating good food.

Ok, let me explain by giving an example from my own experience.

Let's explain by way of examples to show how much fees might cost you in the long run.

Let us explain by starting at the beginning.

let me explain by using an example.

Let me explain by an example: Suppose you bring a lawsuit against the driver of another car who hit you.

Let's explain by conducting an experiment:

Not exact matches

If Poloz was correct, and the media only care about prices when they spike to absurd levels, then let me suggest that some us are about to make up for it by working overtime to explain why the Bank of Canada wants to raise interest rates even though core inflation is trending away from the two - per - cent target.

The sentiment seemed widespread on tech and media Twitter: there was a lack of specificity in terms of questions about privacy (this allowed Zuckerberg to turn nearly every question about the ownership of data to a discussion about user interface controls that limit where data is shown to other Facebook users), plenty of dodged questions (every time there was a question about the data Facebook generates about users beyond what they themselves enter into the system Zuckerberg needed to «check with his team»), and bad questions that presumed Facebook sells data, letting Zuckerberg run out the clock at least three times by explaining the basics of Facebook's business model (this is precisely why I have been so outspoken about the problem of perpetrating this falsehood: it lets Facebook off the hook).

Before any of you doth protest too much about this conclusion, let me explain the rationale for my inclusion of diversification strategy among the other much better known systemically fraudulent practices regularly engaged in by big commercial brokerage firms and banks.

Let me start this article by explaining what interest rate means.

For arguments sake let us talk about science, is every thing in this world explained by science?

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

During the rest of this letter I shall be trying to explain what I mean by this idea of independence, but let me start with an analogy.

Since these «mixed» ventures may not always be the churches» most direct or effective way of fulfilling their central function of explaining the ultimate meaning of life to their adherents — and certainly not if muffled by the requirements of public fisc — perhaps churches should be less eager to enter into what can at best be but a very unequal partnership with the public, and less tenacious in clinging to «mixed» institutions rather than letting them spin off to nonsectarian auspices.

Let the college president or provost explain that the vocal incivility of a few has deprived this year's graduatse of the privilege of hearing from a commencement speaker who was deemed worthy by those responsible for according that honor.

By the way Peter never identified himself as the rock... Explain to me these passages, Acts 4:8 - 11» then, Peter, filled with holy spirit, said to them: «Rulers of the people and older men, 9 if we are this day being examined, on the basis of a good deed to an ailing man, as to by whom this man has been made well, 10 let it be known to all of YOU and to all the people of Israel, that in the name of Jesus Christ the Naz · a · rene», whom YOU impaled but whom God raised up from the dead, by this one does this man stand here sound in front of YOBy the way Peter never identified himself as the rock... Explain to me these passages, Acts 4:8 - 11» then, Peter, filled with holy spirit, said to them: «Rulers of the people and older men, 9 if we are this day being examined, on the basis of a good deed to an ailing man, as to by whom this man has been made well, 10 let it be known to all of YOU and to all the people of Israel, that in the name of Jesus Christ the Naz · a · rene», whom YOU impaled but whom God raised up from the dead, by this one does this man stand here sound in front of YOby whom this man has been made well, 10 let it be known to all of YOU and to all the people of Israel, that in the name of Jesus Christ the Naz · a · rene», whom YOU impaled but whom God raised up from the dead, by this one does this man stand here sound in front of YOby this one does this man stand here sound in front of YOU.

Let me show you this by explaining more carefully what this verse teaches.

I have also explained that potentiality here does not mean what most have meant by omnipotence, as though God could, as it were, say «Let there be such - and - such,» and there would be such - and - such.

Since then, the Steady State Theory has been disproven, and the Big Bang Theory has been shown to be correct, vindicating a form of «Creationism», which not only explains «let there be light» (the early universe was dominated by radiation — light), but explains of separation of light and darkness — the decoupling era, about 300,000 earth years after the big bang, when the universe cooled below the ionization energy of hydrogen, allowing it to become transparent for the first time.

PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any of them they can not give you the answers and the reason being... there are none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws of Physics, Matter in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full of Matter can be created out of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.

In order to support my contention, let me begin by summarizing the way Whitehead explains consciousness as a function, deriving from prior modes of experience.

Let us suppose that not all of the earliest Christians explained the Easter experience (s) by concluding that Jesus had been raised.

To explain the second strategy, let us recall the display of the reductionist order of the sciences along the «Comtean ladder,» which arranges the forms of life and the corresponding specialized disciplines in an ascending series of rungs starting with physics at the base, followed by chemistry, biology, psychology, sociology and, depending on one's inclination, history and religion.

I want to explain this statement in more detail (which I will do in tomorrow's post), but let's temporarily move on to the second and third questions sent in by the reader.

«While he was letting it cool off,» Curry explained, «I tried to engage him in conversation by asking where the ranch that was featured on his large belt buckle was located.

For those of you who don't know (and are totally put off by the idea of fistfuls of raw parsley) let me explain.

Let me explain: I made the little stack of Protein French Toast you see here by using a couple of slices of the protein banana bread I uploaded yesterday.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

In an interview with the Cape Cod Times Sherman explained why he did not pursue another high - level job after being let go by the Dolphins:

Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».

Didn't Giroud explain last week that even the players know that they have to take it game by game and not let themselves get distracted by one bad result (Please add link Admin)(** Link added — Admin **)

DEAR PHIL Let me tell you something: i read carefully what you say, you JON FOX and KEN 1945 since you are our «elder brothers», attending since the sixties (even if you, PHIL, are quit abusive with me, sometimes) therefore i respond to your enquiries: 1 - I believe we» r not progreessing but it's essentially due to the finincial restriction and the spending power of our oppenents (even if Wenger is RESPOSIBLE partly with his dogmatic conception of economics) 2 - Going second to sixth is not of course what we could: should achieve but it been explained by my first answer 3 - I give attention to my fellow arsenal fans, like you, what they are thinking, not to the oppenents (most of the PL clubs fans would give their lives to have a manager with the same success as Wenger over two decades, the first of dominating and the second of re-building the club after the stadium building) Now i am not against another manager if he can do better than the one we have but you must, my friend, respect him for what he has done.....

Despite their current malaise, though, Marseille have always boasted some fine talents and a glance at those who have been let go by the club recently perhaps explains why they are struggling so badly now...

Before i begin let me explain that i am in no way taken in by all this negativity that has surrounded the media and some of the people who jump on the bandwagon calling themselves arsenal supporters.

He does the dirty work often that goes unnoticed by the average fan but his magnificent success as a receiver out of the backfield is uniquely tied to his proficiency as a blocker... let me explain

Let me explain their development age by age.

Let's start this research by explaining what baby carrier is.

I asked if she had weekend guests, and she sheepishly explained that she and her husband actually sleep on the air mattress and let their baby sleep in their room while their toddler hogs the room that is intended to be shared by the brothers.

It goes on to explain that by simply letting the baby «finish the first breast first» — switching breasts when the baby comes off the breast on his own rather than after a set time — the mother can be sure her baby receives the «proper balance of fluid and fat.»

Before we get into the list of baby girl names inspired by some beloved Disney characters, let me explain to you why I am an expert on all things Disney.

I'm not sure if you are still looking for advice, but I have experience with it... My 8 yr old stayed in the bed with me (and hubby) since day 1, when I got pregnant with my second when he was 16 mths old, we set up his room with a toddler bed (he could get out of his playpen since 9 mths un-assisted, and never had a crib) so we made sure it was fun and playful and gave him that option, we also set up a separate cot beside out bed, so he could be with us still (I was not comfortable being pregnant with a toddler and hubby in bed then, knowing I would have a baby soon) since I was pregnant I was able to talk about it to him and explain why he was going to have to one day move to his own bed (in our room or his) by the time I had the baby he was starting the nights in his own bed and if he woke up he would come into his cot beside our bed... I let him continue like that as long as he wanted, it took time but I did not push him at all, same with breast feeding I let him make the choice... when I left my hubby (now ex) the boys were both big enough (2 and 4 yrs) for me to be comfortable with them both in bed with me, and I was still nursing my younger one until he was around 3.5 yrs old, so we just had a big bed with us all piled in, I miss those days so much: (so how did I finally get them both out of my bed?

Let me explain, this was a Game Lodge, meaning 4 x 4» ing and celebrating with champers, however the celebrating could go on with Appletiser, lounging by the pool and in our lovely thatched roof cabin had to replace the game drives.

When my children were young, my father used to interrupt every one of my attempts to explain our parenting philosophy; he would say, «That's rubbish» followed by, «Let me tell you how it works.»

So everyone is on the same wave length, let's explain what I mean by «natural» and also «epidural.»

Now let us explain a few of the advantages that you will get by having an umbrella stroller or you can say the purposes that considered as the reason for buying one.

Whiteners and brighteners — First let's start by explaining the difference between whiteners and brighteners.

This is further supported by the Second Amendment (right to keep and bear arms) and Federalist Paper Number 46 (James Madison) explained that it was a sign of trust by the government that it let it's citizen keep arms and that the people need not fear the government because the people were armed.

Garcia, by contrast, has appeared shaky in explaining how he'd pay for millions of dollars in new spending that he says would even Chicago's socioeconomic playing field — let alone how he'd deal with the city's $ 20 billion in unfunded pension liabilities.