Sentences with phrase «let us make a decision on»

We let her make those decisions on her own.»

She went over all the pros and cons of home birth and did not let us make a decision on the spot but sent us home with a later - day appointment.

We just like to let people know what we have and let them make the decision on entering or not.

It's better to give at least a couple names for the client to contact, then let them make the decision on their own.

Not exact matches

Cake lets restaurateurs make decisions based on the experiences of similar business in their area and across the country.

To make the initial decision to do the production and let others do the selling, you need to focus on getting that production facility just right.

Now let me explain what's really going on here and how Sony's response to a perceived no - win situation was the wrong decision that only made matters worse.

So the decision was made, «Alright, look, let's take XPS, and let's go give the gaming business to Alienware, and let's focus XPS on other areas like premium products and other things.

I was trying to empower my employees — to let them know they could make decisions on their own, without me.»

«Wouldn't it be great, let's say on he goes on to be president,» she said, «and I have all my girls on a trans issues board to advise him on making decisions when it comes to trans issues.

Clear decisions will have to be made on the Irish border in the coming weeks, let alone by the Autumn.

Researchers say that for many choices, spontaneous decisions — based on letting your thoughts just go with the flow until they alight on something that feels right — can be as satisfying as decisions made with deep deliberation.

Let the recipient make their own decision to pass it on, but make it easy for them too.

You could invest your money in a target - date retirement fund in line with your approximate retirement year, choose a target allocation fund based on the level of risk and return that you're comfortable with, or go with a managed account and let an advisor help you make decisions.

If you've got a Pastor who can keep from infringing on the equal rights of all, and they know how to make good decisions without being blinded by their personal experiences, then bring him / her forth and let them run for President or any government position.

Rely on others to make these types of decisions for you and you will inevitably be let down.

If we make foolish decisions based on some improper understanding of the Sovereignty of God, He is very likely to step back and let us experience the consequences of our foolish decisions rather than step in and help us out of the predicament we got ourselves into.

It is difficult to take proper account of the myriad relevant factors in making decisions on even relatively minor matters like diet, let alone such major concerns as foreign policy or population control.

Colin says it best, but lets be clear here, as long as the bible is even remotely taken seriously when it comes to making laws, hiring decisions or really any decision that has any bearing on my life whatsoever, I'll be there to point out just how ridiculous the bible is.

And we can forget opennes on abortion, stem cell research and let people make their own decisions as to how to die.

Ronald Reagan was a joke.He let his wife and the astrologists make his decisions with the help of the bankers on Wall Street.

I don't have to believe what you believe, just as you do not have to believe what I believe... all I ask is that we start allowing out children to grow up and make the decision for themselves; that religion be kept out the government and school systems and that I don't have to hear it on the street corner... if you don't want to hear us then don't let us hear you.

Let them grow up and make the decision on their own!

Couldn't he have just let pharaoh make his decision then base the plagues on that instead of continuing to harden it himself and cause more death?

I do have to warn you, however, that Satan does not want you to let Jesus come into your life and you can expect a real battle going on as you make the decision to ask Jesus in or to reject Him.

Hence we must go on to speak of prayer as the confession of our human failings, imperfections, distortions of the divine goodness, and unwillingness to let ourselves be used as channels for that goodness in the decisions we make and the acts we do.

Let a kitten suddenly cross the road on which you have been driving absentmindedly, and your previously absent mind will return in a flash, to take over control, to make a rapid decision whether to run over the kitten or risk the safety of your passengers.

A pastor friend of mine had attended Schuller's Institute for Successful Church Leadership in Garden Grove, California, and while he was generally positive about his experience there, he reported two emphases that bothered me: (1) Schuller avoids preaching on anything that is controversial, and (2) Schuller says, «Don't let laypeople get too involved in decision - making in the congregation.»

Let the medical professionals make a living doing what they do but cut out the person sitting at a desk playing god and making the ultimate decisions on who will be treated.

This was a decision fraught with anxiety though, let me tell you: I desperately wanted to make them (they're on the list!)

Tonight I let Juliet make the final decision about which cookies to make, since she didn't like Nathaniel's gargantuan chocolate birthday cake, or the pumpkin cheesecake on Thanksgiving.

Let's make the distinction, at this point, then, between a marketing - based decision and a legal - based decision on whether to acknowledge your competitor.

Maybe you've solved a problem nobody really has — we worked on a client one time who was determined to throw their operations into chaos by letting consumers build 100 percent customized burgers, from the type of bun, to the types of meats, to dozens of toppings — you - the - diner made every decision.

I flip flop on the chocolate vs vanilla thing all the dang time, so both together with no tough decisions always makes me happy to Ha yes let's keep dentists and tastebuds happy all at the same time and stick to ice CREAM instead of ice CUBE sandwiches.

So let us reserve any any more debate about Wenger's future until we have reached the end of the season, and we can make a more informed decision on whether we eally want him to leave or not?

let's use your same arguments... GIROUD is a great SUB and yes indeed a Game changer, for WENGER was his first and only choice striker... if Giroud did not injure back then, he would not have bought Welbeck and by the way he was not planning to buy anyone, someone on the board made the last minute decision for him, while he was receiving the blessing from the Pope and giving thanksl for the great job he has, were he is not being held accountable.

Football is a business, and the Steelers made business decisions to let James go on several occasions, both early and late in his career.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

Your thinking would have some credence if Wenger had made a decision with Wilshere, long before now, in fact well before he went on loan to Bourmemouth, to let him go.

Conor Orr has the full breakdown on those decisions, so let's focus on one guy who didn't make that list and therefore could be coming to a team near you.

On the other hand, there were clear moments where Girardi would let his distrust of a player interfere with his decision - making.

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

I think it will be Arsenal / Arsene that can make the final decision on letting wishere leave or stay and not the other way.

Perhaps that was because we needed him as a back up, especially when the decision to let the versatile Calum Chambers go to Middlesborough on loan was made.

With the January transfer window rapidly approaching, a decision will have to be made on the pair and rather than lose them for nothing in July, it's time Arsenal and Arsene Wenger to let the pair go.

There's no smoke screen going on here, it's been known for a while that he wants to stay in London and join us which is why Chelsea have made noises all along about «respecting the players wishes» to deflect any flak for letting him go across the city, putting the spotlight on Cech saying it's all his decision.

if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long

Unlike Darnold, Rosen threw touchdowns, didn't let the clock run out on his offense in the first half with a field - goal attempt in the making, and appeared to make solid decisions.

He got behind Zabaleta on some occasions but his decision making and crossing let him down.

Stupid decision was made in the summer to let them go on a free, so Wenger, and the board need to see it through, as it's even more of a stupid decision to sell in January!