There is a need to ensure appropriate or meaningful human control or judgement over the use of force, including the use of
lethal force against human targets.
In this case your own life is threatened, even though you created the situation that warranted the use of
lethal force against you.
Could you reasonably mount a legal defense of
lethal force against nonviolent felonies?
Am I legally able to use my own firearm to use
lethal force against the officer to protect the apparently unarmed man?
How do laws that allow me to use
lethal force against the general population apply when the individual I would be defending from is a police officer?
«From SWAT raids to simple calls and even visits to wrong addresses, we are seeing more and more incidents of officers using
lethal force against a family pet, despite the fact that no officer has ever been killed in the line of duty by a dog,» said director Michael Ozias.
When a Staten Island grand jury refused to return a criminal indictment of an officer in the death of Eric Garner, she issued a press release declaring «the use of excessive and
lethal force against people of color is a persistent problem nationwide.»
The answer is that the government does not have the right to use
lethal force against it's own citizens without due process.
The document provides the Justice Department's legal rationale for the controversial policy of using
lethal force against U.S. citizens fighting on behalf of terrorist groups.
Whatever it is called, it is the unlimited right to the private use of
lethal force against innocent human beings.
Not exact matches
The «presumption
against war» is sometimes expressed as a presumption
against violence, with violence defined as any use of
lethal force.
My focus was on why
lethal violence is not appropriate
against abortionists and their staffs, when it would be considered heroic to use
force to save, for instance, infants under attack or to free concentration camp inmates.
The use of excessive and
lethal police
force against people of color is a persistent problem nationwide and we must recommit ourselves to building a more just city and society where all people, regardless of color, are treated equally by law enforcement.
Like the laws
against homicide, anti-cruelty laws excuse intentional killing in the rare cases when harm is imminent and serious, making
lethal force necessary.
A weapons system that identifies, selects and employs
force against targets without meaningful human control should be considered a
lethal autonomous weapons system.