Sentences with phrase «lets people view»

It lets people view books on many different devices, adapting the formatting to the screen size.
Hardware is a less recognized area of online video opportunity, but it's one that brothers Jason and Blake Krikorian have turned into a 100 - person company, Sling Media Inc., which sells devices to let people view the same programming on their computers that they get through their cable or satellite TV services.
Zoosk Seniors doesn't let people view other members» profiles before logging in.
Let the people viewing your profile know what you expect and want on a bisexual dating site.

Not exact matches

They should also let you view how many people unsubscribed and how many email addresses weren't valid, plus how many emails weren't delivered and why.
A more effective approach is to show a range of perspectives, let people see where their views are on a spectrum and come to a conclusion on what they think is right.
If you have a friend who loves Trump and you don't, and all he or she talks about is Trump, well, spend less time with that person or just explain that you appreciate his followers» passion for the candidate but you hold a different view and don't want to let politics get between the two of you, so best to leave it behind.
Mozilla has also integrated the popular app Pocket, lets people save web content for later readings and viewings, into the new Firefox Quantum.
This lets people instantly get to know you and learn how you can help them when they view your profile.
And if complexity is such a problem, why are people raving about a new Amazon (AMZN) Prime perk, which lets members store shows and movies for off - line viewing?
Police officers start letting people, in groups, into sectioned - off areas known as «party pens» just before the New Year's Eve bash begins at 6 p.m. (though many people wait around hours before then to get a good view of the ball drop).
Now any attempt to abstract a person is going to be of limited utility, but I let's try this point of view: maybe Obama is, on domestic policy, a mostly unreconstructed 1970s upper middle - class left - liberal who.
Now any attempt to abstract a person is going to be of limited utility, but I let's try this point of view: maybe Obama is, on domestic policy, a....
Let us remember that and be more respectful — let us reach out to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different views and INSTEAD of trying to degrade someone just because they refuse to adhere to your beliefs — LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT to believe or not believe as they wiLet us remember that and be more respectful — let us reach out to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different views and INSTEAD of trying to degrade someone just because they refuse to adhere to your beliefs — LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT to believe or not believe as they wilet us reach out to each other with AT THE LEAST tolerance that each person will have different views and INSTEAD of trying to degrade someone just because they refuse to adhere to your beliefs — LISTEN to them and allow that you may feel differently but they have a RIGHT to believe or not believe as they will.
And there are peoples (in India, for example) who have been more hesitant than we have been to acquire this view of the world, or (at any rate) hesitant about letting it become a dominant attitude.
but religious people will find meaning in completely mundane things to support their views so let them.
So folks lets grow and be human inndeed tolerant so not to impose ur views on others, let people live as per their wishes in a peaceful manner.
This is the point of view of an elitist from the first world with total disregard to the circu.mstances of lots and lots of people in much more difficult circ.umstances in the rest of the world who have neither the leisure time, education, literacy, or resources to «study» any religion, let alone choose yours to study.
Rodrigo, let us not pretend that a person on opposite views would not openly and quickly declare that the others point is empty or lacking.
I am tired of how people who believe in their own «gods» try to shove religion down other peoples throat, what I mean is if your religion doen not let you support guns then don't support it but also don't try to change it for everyone else who doesn't see it your way, I don't go around asking for you all's religion to remove crosses from public view because I don't believe and to remove the bible from public places (i.e. Hotels, Bookstores, etc.) so it can only be seen in their respective places of workship, Remember WE ALL ARE BORN ATHEIST, YOU ARE NOT BORN WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS A GOD, YOUR PARENTS HAVE TO TELL YOU THERE IS A GOD, A DEVIL, HEAVEN AND EARTH... THEN IT BEGINGS.
If you let your children expand their world view through diverse cultural learning and taught respect for all peoples belief's and religions we might actually see hope for the planet, but you are far to short sighted for that and will likely use your indoctrinated offspring to usher in a new religious dark age.
I also know that I personally don't let people I work with know my religious views for fear of retaliation (it happened to my MIL.
Let me give you some examples of people you could try to develop relationships with: atheists, abortion doctors, homosexuals, pornographers, strippers, prostitutes, drug addicts, alcoholics, people who have different theological views than you do, people with different political views, etc..
As an Atheist, I let my children read as they see fit, but I limit their private exposure to religious people, particularly keeping him away from groups with extreme views.
So if you don't want gay people to marry because of your church views, then don't let them get married in your church.
You are the one with hate built into your very world - view and until you are willing to let other people alone about it, I am free to disparage your disgusting religion on a public board.
in case you haven't figured it out yet, let's be mildly elementary in our reasoning... CNN needs traffic on their website and posting things that get people going (like this) accomplishes that... since when was anyone swayed in their world view by an internet comment?
The CNN Belief Blog asked some prominent voices with different views on religion how they make sense of such suffering, where they see inspiration amid destruction and how they respond to people who wonder, «How could God let this happen?»
In the mean time, lets respect other people's views and avoid calling them names.
Trying to apply that story to theological discussions such as predestination, who God hates, people's eternal destiny and similar topics is probably a case of trying to find Bible stories to support a theological viewpoint, as in «this is our theology, now let's see if we can find some verses in the Bible that might support our views».
This is a good first step and I am glad that they took it, but let's see what else they do to counter the years of using their faith to demonize a group of people who are different and don't subscribe to their view of the world and what they think is «moral».
But the vast majority of people will be disturbed just by reading about these scenes, let alone viewing them on the big screen.
Ok people let's use this same pathetic logic against African Americans and women, they were both view as inferior by prejudice bigots similar to Bob.
Let's prevent them from opening and hiring people in our town because they share the same view as 80 percent of all American.
... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every human person... all people are «impelled by nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.
If it ever comes up in classes or small groups, etc our only direction is to let people know the traditional view and the our church's official stance (and even in that, there is a bit of an element of this series, don't you think?).
Lets educate people on how to respect the views and opinions of others.
Such a view of law would permit for - profit corporations to have the moral culpability of criminal convictions, take moral views on a slew of ethical concerns, and let corporations exercise other constitutional guarantees as persons while inexplicably siphoning off only for - profit corporations from religious protection.
but at the end of the day the common denominator we have on here is that we want to be successful and win the league again, which I am afraid we wont under this present regime i.e AW and his staff lets not attack people who don't share the same views as you, even though it might frustrate the hell out of yourself lets all look forward with envigorated enthusiasm to the changing of the guard
Thanks Geoff Wood, but you see all those Useless people who in charge of the Team will never listen and really understand your point of view, the only way to show our Anger is for all the Fans to Seat at home on March days let the whole Stadium be Empty and no Fans should purchase Season Tickets for next season.
I let a lot of stuff go and don't like people apologising for their views (it all comes from somewhere real and we can't shy away from that), but I draw the line at hypocrisy.
Introducing spiritual practices to your child when she's young — such as lighting candles or singing hymns together — lets your child view them as a natural part of life, and allows you to have a spiritual influence on her before other people do.
He ends the video, which has clocked up dozens of views, urging people: «Don't let others decide your future behind closed doors.
Besides this fear of crossover voters «stealing» the primary away from people who actually are in the party, one bonus purported from here is that a closed primary tends to let candidates talk more openly about their views during the primary since they are largely just speaking to their base.
In any case, now might be the right time for people who support this view to lend their support to another, this time post-referendum petition to parliament to «Let Parliament decide whether or not we remain a member of the European Union»
«Most people do not pay much attention to politics at all; when they do, let's make sure they hear something that changes their view of the Conservative party, not just of Europe.»
Leaving aside the usual imprecision of lumping together people with diverse views with a simplistic label («right wing» libertarians in USA are strongly anti-gay-discrimination), let's not forget that SA was strongly pro-homosexual all the way to the top (Rohm).
Pro-opposition pressure group Let My Vote Count Alliance had suggested that the EC could not meet the deadline of six - days to provide the list since in their view; there were nearly four million of such persons on the register.
In our view the PRS, and schemes such as Real Lettings, provide pragmatic alternatives to social housing, which if set alongside the right services and support can help a person to maintain their tenancy and live independently over time.»
He said: «In Scotland my view is very very strongly that we have to say to the Scottish people we're sorry, for letting you down, for making you feel abandoned, and Scottish labour is under new management.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z