Let's say your goal is, «I want to be a middle manager at a big company.»
Let's say your goal is $ 1,000,000 per year.
Let's say my goal is to reach $ 240 in dividends in 2018.
80g is the low end of the daily allowance: for simplicity sake,
lets say our goal is 15P: 35C: 50F with 80gP being the goal.
Let's say your goal is to retire yourself in five years and earn $ 8,000 per month in passive income...... Can you go from no passive income to $ 8,000 / month overnight?
Let's say your goal is to save $ 1,000 in a year and you're paid bi-weekly.
For example, let's say your goal is to take your family of 4 to Hawaii.
Lets say my goal is for a short term one and i want to accumulate as much as possible.
Let's say your goal is to cover your monthly expenses so you can retire early.
Let's say my goals for the sake of the assessment are buying a home at 30, and having to tap my nest egg — for, uh, something — at age 35.
For example, let's say your goal is to take your family of 4 to Hawaii.
Let's say your goal is to produce $ 4,000 in rent payments per month via your real estate investments.
Let's say your goal is to achieve a certain percentage of market share.
Not exact matches
As a result, it makes sense to
let employees know from the start that
goals will change,
say, annually.
Yet financial advisors
say you shouldn't
let this development spook you from staying the course when it comes to your investment
goals.
Instead, the
goal is for Facebook to set up the aerial Internet infrastructure, and then
let major carriers operate and distribute the web in a similar manner to how they do so on Earth, Parikh
said.
In fact, Brainard
said the Fed should consider
letting inflation run «modestly above» the 2 percent
goal before hiking again.
Let's
say you start investing $ 350 a month without a clear
goal in mind.
That
said,
let's move on to my progress against these
goals.
When you build another's trust in that manner and then later
say to him, «
Let me tell you about Jesus», it only continues his distrust that your
goal, your hidden agenda all along, was to build his confidence only to sneak in later and convince him that «your» religion is right and «his» religion is only sending him to hell.
Let us then provisionally define religion as the totality of an individual's sincere attitudes and predispositions toward that which serves as the final expression of that individual's particular primary interest or
goal — which in fact is very much the same as
saying, with Whitehead: «Religion is what the individual does with his [or her] own solitariness» (TIM 16).
«My
goal with this book,» he writes, «is to assure people of faith that they do not need to feel anxious, disloyal, unfaithful, dirty, scared, or outcast for engaging these questions of the Bible, interrogating it, not liking some of it, exploring what it really
says, and discerning like adult readers what we can learn from it in our own journey of faith... We respect the Bible most when we
let it be what it is and learn from it rather than combing out the tangles to make it presentable.»
So I try to be more aware of my feelings, my needs and my
goals so that I sometimes
say no in order to be able to
say yes and be fully there when I think I should be... I want to choose to give and not
let people take all the time...
The kind that joins together with a common
goal, to play the best they can, to win a championship,
let's
say?
Since that Giroud removal in that Chelsea match, he has appeared to have intentionally withdrew himself from scoring
goals for Arsenal as if to
say to the Boss okay, win the title then
let me see.
goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some
goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here
saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of
goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the
saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you
let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?
People keep using stats to defend him because that's the only way to defend him.When you watch him most at times you he hardly wows you or is any special.Can i ask a question couldn't Chamakh or Bendtner or Aliadiere score about 15 - 18
goals with this super super creative arsenal midfield.I mean
lets be honest if Chamakh in his first season should have scored 20
goals in EPL many people would still want him out you know why because watching every aspect of his game and also analyzing every aspect of his game he was below average in his time at arsenal to be honest.So its not only about stats because stats do nt tell me the whole story about a player though they are facts and don't lie the eyes do nt lie.And with this same eyes we look at players and
say Aguero is better thab Bony, Costa is better than Remy, and so on.
Omg u lot were slating giroud for ages
saying how he is not a class striker or a match winner then we go for lacazette who is world class with great pace and a eye for
goal this lad is top draw trust me
let giroud go wenger can't win
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could
said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his
goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one...
lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid...
lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
@uche exactly... its getting really annoying for us fans, not to talk of Wenger... if he is leaving / staying, he shld com out and
say it no matter who he pisses of... 120k in either team no b beans...
let every1 knw is decision so the teams can start planning appropriately... it will suck if he stays cuz to find a striker with a lower risk % is low (English, guarantees
goals, proven in EPL, has a strong personality?)
, then I
say a definite yes because both players can use both feet and swirl around OG when a ball comes in or like yesterday when a ball came in to OG with back to
goal and he
let it go with a flick and Griezeman was off on a breakaway which he chipped the Iceland keeper.
That
said, i expect lots of
goals from Lacazette and I'm confident he won't
let us down.
Assists are great but can he not learn to pass a ball into a
goal and assist his team mates for 90 or
let's
say 75 minutes?
We lack a player (s) who are determined to not concede early, who
let one
goal, two
goals even away from home in Europe and
say «no more, we'll take them in the home leg».
«Chris Berman set the bar so high for the Home Run Derby, my
goal will be to keep it there and
let the amazing athletes take it to new heights,» Ravech
said in a statement.
you know when he is one on one... its a
goal not so sure about Campbell... Cant believe i'm
saying this... i was one of the first people in my group to pick on walcott but after last season... He definitely has
goals in him... and in big matches somehow he is in and around the
goals / results I like Campbell but i think he was actually
let go to give a shot for the Ox to make a regular spot which i think the Ox has done.
in conclusion, what I am
saying is
let's hope Walcott stays fit for us these season and you will see he will grow in confidence and score
goals with loads of assists like what he did some season back.
The same people who
say how great Van Persie was for us because of his
goals berate Walcott who is in the Arsenal's 5th highest premier league scorer ahead of players like Pires and Ljungberg (
let no one tell me number of years he's played.
All I'm
saying is
lets have some measured judgement with Giroud and not suddenly think he's a
goal machine (57goals in 127games is good, but not amazing).
This would be the gung - ho all out attack formation... when you just
say «Fxck it...
let's see who can score more
goals!»
Play players that will play for our crest, Chelsea game proved that and just put out them, I
said in summer arsenal want dries mertens and got nothing but thumps down I've got fantastic source was told arsenal will get him next summer but only stop is we got ta get bk in champions league we need go on run next few woks and we need beat Everton which is our next real tough fix, just look at da ox it's a mistake he went apparently he promised he's girl that he go Liverpool that why he took pay cut well grass is not always greener we need play same as at Chelsea and keep winning and get buzz really going
let's beat wba and I'd play jack for da game we don't need Cdm for wba at home
let's get
goals lacasette get couple
let us give him a long rope to hang himself with, protesting and unfurling banners
saying «wenger must go» will be detrimental to our
goal of getting shot of Wenger....
However I like the article because not a short while ago going to football was all about supporting your team and enjoying the match... we always used to applaud great
goals by the opposition whilst still maintaining friendly banter So as Bob
said lets look forward with anticipation to these European nights as a new adventure..
Well
said, you must crawl b4 you can walk.An at the moment Ozil is not ven close to a ballon d'or nomination
let alone winning it, hes just not good enough to compete with Messi, Ronaldo, Neymar, Suarez, ibra etc, h just doesn't score enough
goals to compete.Your rite galen, he needs to try winning sports writers player of the year or the pfa player of the year first.
But, having
said that, if Oli had not missed 3 months and was also our penalty taker, I'm pretty sure he'd be the top scorer in the league right now, so even without being «just the guy up top who bangs in the
goals» he's doing the business so
let's
let's give credit where credit is due.
I
say hit them like a cyclone from start,
let them know if they open their Ass while looking for
goal that we gon screw the Ass without pity.
Now
let me
say why we conceed toomany
goals from set.
I agree, WS would have probably saved that one — problem is I
said Ospina would have saved that soft
goal WS
let squeeze past him versus Reading.
cavalho plus a quality striker will do for me... and it does nt have to be a cavani and certainly not a remy... just someone with pace skill and an eye for
goal... and we can get things moving but it will require wenger to spend 50m in next 5 days... as i keep
saying its a simple test of whether hes willing to put fans and club above board and profits...
lets see
So what you want us to
say is, okay, Liverpool
let in 3
goals against Watford so there's no problem with our defense right?