In a nutshell, our claim in that du Pont and his colleagues reach counter-intuitive conclusions (for example that the EU has made a more «equitable» pledge than either China or India) by way of a cascading series of decisions that, taken together, skew their approach towards various kinds of grandfathering, while, at the same time, appearing to be derived from a balanced and comprehensive set of high -
level equity principles.
Not exact matches
Indeed, transfers and regional
equity are enshrined in Section 36 of the 1982 Constitution Act and Section 36 (2) reads: «Parliament and the government of Canada are committed to the
principle of making equalization payments to ensure that provincial governments have sufficient revenues to provide reasonably comparable
levels of public services at reasonably comparable
levels of taxation.»
Only with regard to the Oliners» third type, the
principled orientation, do we get attention to the
level of reflectivity and autonomy exercised by persons choosing rescue activity as an expression of their duty in relation to the demands of
equity and justice, or their duty in relation to the imperative to care.
«The court order in the Campaign for Fiscal
Equity lawsuit was founded on the
principle that all schools need adequate funding
levels in order to provide every student a «sound basic education.»
The responsibility of each citizen and community to ensure meaningful decision - making that is based on the twin
principles of ecological integrity and socio - economic
equity, conditioned in the interim by a «common but differentiated responsibility» in which those currently rich within the country take on a greater role and / or are incentivised or forced to to give up their excessively consumptive lifestyles in order for the poor to have adequate
levels of human security.
Creating classrooms that support
equity of access to excellence requires that educators at all
levels focus on seven interrelated
principles.
(James J. Barta and Michael G. Allen); «Ideas and Programs To Assist in the Untracking of American Schools» (Howard D. Hill); «Providing
Equity for All: Meeting the Needs of High - Ability Students» (Sally M. Reis); «Promoting Gifted Behavior in an Untracked Middle School Setting» (Thomas O. Erb et al.); «Untracking Your Middle School: Nine Tentative Steps toward Long - Term Success» (Paul S. George); «In the Meantime: Using a Dialectical Approach To Raise
Levels of Intellectual Stimulation and Inquiry in Low - Track Classes» (Barbara G. Blackwell); «Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning» (Robert E. Slavin); «Incorporating Cooperation: Its Effects on Instruction» (Harbison Pool et al.); «Improving All Students» Achievement: Teaching Cognitive and Metacognitive Thinking Strategies» (Robert W. Warkentin and Dorothy A. Battle); «Integrating Diverse Learning Styles» (Dan W. Rea); «Reintegrating Schools for Success: Untracking across the United States» (Anne Wheelock); «Creatinga Nontraditional School in a Traditional Community» (Nancy B. Norton and Charlotte A. Jones); «Ungrouping Our Way: A Teacher's Story» (Daphrene Kathryn Sheppard); «Educating All Our Students: Success in Serving At - Risk Youth» (Edward B. Strauser and John J. Hobe); «Technology Education: A New Application of the
Principles of Untracking at the Secondary
Level» (N. Creighton Alexander); «Tracking and Research - Based Decisions: A Georgia School System's Dilemma» (Jane A. Page and Fred M. Page, Jr.); and «A Call to Action: The Time Has Come To Move beyond Tracking» (Harbison Pool and Jane A. Page).
In
principle, the higher surplus
levels and the longer liabilities should allow for investment in longer - duration assets like
equities, but the regulations make that difficult.
Any national ghg emissions reduction commitment is implicitly a position on two ethical questions, namely, first, what safe atmospheric ghg concentration
level the commitment aims to achieve and, second, what
equity framework or
principles of distributive justice the percent reduction is based on.
The long term mitigation goal of the UNFCCC process, a zero emissions paradigm needed to stabilize the climate at any temperature
level, will not be successful without differentiation,
equity, implementation of fair shares, and clear
principles of a just transition.
Any national ghg emissions reduction commitment is implicitly a position on two ethical questions, namely, first, what safe atmospheric ghg concentration
level the commitment is designed to achieve and, second, what
equity framework or
principles of distributive justice the INDC is based on.
As identified by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), Governments must work together at all
levels with the full participation of Indigenous people on a «holistic» response to climate change that takes account of not only the ecological dimensions of climate change, but also the social impacts and
principles of human rights,
equity and environmental justice.
To achieve these goals at the national, state, and local
levels, policies and decisions must be guided of
principles of Excellence, Access,
Equity, Diversity, and Accountability.