Democratic email fundraising may not quite have reached
the level of a Global Catastrophe yesterday, but it sure as hell got talked about: I heard an earful at a NARAL fundraiser last night, and various back - channel email lists and Facebook groups buzzed with people sick and tired of repetitive fundraising messages sent by campaigns, PACs and the party committees.
Democratic email fundraising may not quite have reached
the level of a Global Catastrophe yesterday, but it sure as hell got talked about: I heard an earful at a NARAL fundraiser last night, and various back - channel email...
Not exact matches
Quantitatively, Vasskog et al. estimate that during this time (the prior interglacial) the GrIS was «probably between ~ 7 and 60 % smaller than at present,» and that that melting contributed to a rise in
global sea
level of «between 0.5 and 4.2 m.» Thus, in comparing the present interglacial to the past interglacial, atmospheric CO2 concentrations are currently 30 % higher,
global temperatures are 1.5 - 2 °C cooler, GrIS volume is from 7 - 67 % larger, and
global sea
level is at least 0.5 - 4.2 m lower, none
of which observations signal
catastrophe for the present.
The latest in the series puts the gap between emissions trends and what is actually required to keep the rise in
global temperature at a
level which does not spell
catastrophe for the planet at between 8 - 12 billion tons
of carbon dioxide - equivalent (CO2e) by 2020 — less a gap than a gaping chasm!
According to the report's preface, signed by Fred Palmer, «the evidence does not show that the increase in CO2
levels attributed to human activity is responsible for a measured rise in
global temperature, or, for that matter, that a warmer climate, if it did occur, poses the threat
of an environmental
catastrophe.»
«[T'he evidence does not show that the increase in CO2
levels attributed to human activity is responsible for a measured rise in
global temperature, or, for that matter, that a warmer climate, if it did occur, poses the threat
of an environmental
catastrophe.»
According to a recent study by the full range
of actions under the bill would lead to emissions reductions
of 77 percent below 1990
levels by 2050, a result consistent with what is needed by the international community as a whole to contain the increase
of average
global temperatures to the
catastrophe - averting limit
of 2 °C.
The current
level of LT temperatures are not likely in the least to produce an imminent
global warming
catastrophe, nor a feared «tipping point.»
Climate researchers warn we must reduce the
level of atmospheric CO2 to 350 ppm in order to avoid
global catastrophe.