Sentences with phrase «level of amplification»

Lee recommends co-creating content to have a base level of amplification built in.

There are seven levels of amplification for the Driver Easy Speak feature, which can be selected via the touchscreen.

Not exact matches

The kit also preserves the single - nucleotide variants (SNVs) and SNV frequencies across different sequencing technologies and allows the amplification of cell - free DNA to levels that permit sequencing.

[Response: Well, something like a circulation changed forced by the NAO pattern (which may in turn be affected by greenhouse gases) might cause an increase in European air temperatures, which in turn would allow low level moisture to increase if there is enough moisture supply, which would then constitute an amplification of a signal driven remotely.

My report identified that the IPCC report was greatly underestimating the rates of change of sea level rise, Greenland and Antarctic Ice melt rates, Arctic temperature amplification levels and completely ignored increased levels of Arctic methane emissions.

Amplification of flood frequencies with local sea level rise and emerging flood regimes.

The amplification of flood frequencies by sea level rise (SLR) is expected to become one of the most economically damaging impacts of climate change for many coastal locations.

Based on three sophisticated stages of semantic calculation (True Reach, Amplification Probability, Network Value) Klout can determine not only the level of influence of any user on Twitter but also the most influential voices tied to topics or keywords.

What we * do * suggest is that the weakened poleward temperature gradient owing to the rapidly warming Arctic relative to mid-latitudes (Arctic amplification) should increase the north - south component of the upper - level flow, making highly wavy jet - stream patterns (like the one this winter) more likely.

Polar amplication is of global concern due to the potential effects of future warming on ice sheet stability and, therefore, global sea level (see Sections 5.6.1, 5.8.1 and Chapter 13) and carbon cycle feedbacks such as those linked with permafrost melting (see Chapter 6)... The magnitude of polar amplification depends on the relative strength and duration of different climate feedbacks, which determine the transient and equilibrium response to external forcings.

So the current level of CO2 is natural but with anthroponenic amplification.

But what if you drag some the CAGW stuff into this - or you get more amplification in the start of increasing levels of CO2.

Finds that in the Northern Hemisphere there is no reduction in the sensible heat transport despite the reduction in the zonal - mean temperature gradient at low levels associated with polar amplification of the warming

The decrease in albedo that accompanies the loss of sea ice is the phenom that underlies «arctic amplification» (as you point out, it has nothing directly to do with sea level rise).

This amplification may include the optimization of agricultural processes to take advantage of increasing levels of CO2.

However, this characterization neither rigorously considered uncertainty in SLR nor distinguished between the amplification of different flooding levels (such as the 10 % versus 0.2 % annual chance floods); therefore, it may be seriously misleading.

Finally, while economics may be critical to your definition of «catastrophic» anthropogenic global warming, economics says nothing about the science underlying the projections of sea level rise, the physics of Arctic amplification, changes to albedo that lead to greater warming that may lead to significant releases of methane clathrate deposits, regional projections of reduce (or enhanced) precipitation, and so on.

Venus has the inverse of Polar Amplification, high levels of climate forcing create strong polar vortices that keep the polar regions massively colder than the rest of the planet.

Please read this Shaviv paper, not from its main angle of proposed amplification of small changes in TSI, but for the data relating to sea level change, SST and OHC.

In the longer term sea level rise is correlated with solar activity — and calorimetric considerations suggest a terrestrial amplification of solar forcing by an order of magnitude.

But a weakening of the NAO and amplification of the AMO could mean droughts for Southwest Europe, but above level precip for North Africa.

Amplification of flood frequencies with local sea level rise and emerging flood regimes.

This is achieved through the study of three independent records, the net heat flux into the oceans over 5 decades, the sea - level change rate based on tide gauge records over the 20th century, and the sea - surface temperature variations... We find that the total radiative forcing associated with solar cycles variations is about 5 to 7 times larger than just those associated with the TSI variations, thus implying the necessary existence of an amplification mechanism, although without pointing to which one.

yet 13 years of ice return and static levels in the arctic would cause little cold build up yet we have amplification?

And if there is a lack of correlation between CO2 amplification and sea level rise acceleration, then it can not be said that CO2 absolutely causes sea level rise acceleration.

Climate hard - liners in developing countries have long argued that keeping global temperatures to a 2 degree C rise over pre-industrial levels was simply too hot, and would risk unleashing many of the worst destabilizing impacts of global warming — including perhaps the triggering of cascading effects and warming amplifications within nature, such as the melting of Arctic permafrost, that could release more greenhouse gases and push temperatures even higher.

They calculated the «amplification factor» of hazard as the high tide mark: they assumed that the frequency of storms would remain unchanged and then they factored in projections of sea level rise.

Without the means to seek that level of Arctic temperature increase within CMIP5 models, a simplistic alternative would be to take Arctic Amplification from IPCC AR5draft as x2.7.

But one modeling study put the threshold level for the eventual near - complete loss of Greenland's ice sheet at a local warming of just 2.7 C — which, due to Arctic amplification, means a global warming of only 1.2 C. Total melting of Greenland — luckily, something that would likely take centuries — would raise sea levels by 7 meters, submerging Miami and most of Manhattan, as well as large chunks of London, Shanghai, Bangkok and Mumbai.

The assumption that the rate of change of sea level rise from those components that were small during the 20th century and which have been attributed to ice sheets would scale with global temperature change leads to a strong and unlimited amplification of future sea level rise when global temperatures continue to increase.

In the almost sure knowledge that the earth never experienced a runaway greenhouse even with ancient CO2 levels 10 to 20 times greater than today, these anti-science scoundrels insist with a «high level of confidence» that this amplification is real and it's based on nothing more than faster than expected surface temperature rise in the past few decades which can be TOTALLY explained by multi-decadal cyclic behavior in ocean currents, trade winds, and / or solar magnetic activity causing small global average albedo changes.

Though polar amplification — which is another term for how global warming spurs the poles to heat up faster than the rest of the world — helped to generate the upper level features in the atmosphere that would consistently generate storms running across the U.S. East Coast, widespread warmer than normal ocean waters helped to give these storms more fuel.

For example, in circumstances where an attachment figure is inconsistently available, physically or emotionally, a person may implicitly adopt hyperactivating attachment strategies involving amplification of attachment needs, high levels of negative emotion, persistent attempts to maintain connection, and intense fear of abandonment (Cassidy & Kobak, 1988).