Sentences with phrase «level of distinction»

The J. Tuzo Wilson Distinguished Alumni Award recognizes outstanding alumni for their dedication to both enriching the lives of others through community service and achieving a level of distinction in their professional field.
The award recognizes outstanding alumni for their dedication to enriching the lives of others through community service and achieving a level of distinction in their professional field.
That they want to give their clients access to writers who have had to demonstrate their writing chops and earn a certain level of distinction in their field.
This year marks the 13th year in a row the firm has received this level of distinction.
Experience a new level of distinction in the first five - star hotel to be newly built in Gstaad in 100 years.
Now you can add a whole new level of distinction with the latest line of parts, components, and accessories from Chevrolet Performance.
This is the finishing touch that really adds a level of distinction to your sign.
Unfortunately, that level of distinction simply isn't enough for most businesses.
Earlier this year, Ladbrokes began taking wagers on students receiving their university degrees with certain levels of distinction.
Just as colleges award diplomas with different levels of distinction (summa cum laude, magna cum laude, cum laude), different types of high school diplomas could be offered depending on a student's performance on the CCSS assessment.
In recognition of outstanding work, the Smithsonian Women's Committee presents cash awards for Gold, Silver and Bronze levels of distinction, Excellence in select categories as well as Exhibitors» Choice Awards.
The awards include Gold, Silver and Bronze levels of distinction, Excellence within select categories (such as jewelry, glass, ceramics, etc.), as well as several Exhibitors» Choice Awards.

Not exact matches

Super Mario Run is listed as a free app in the App Store, but users who downloaded it were quick to discover that this distinction applies to only the first three levels of the game.
There is, of course, a very important distinction to be made between a permanent, but one - time, shift in the level of prices and a persistent increase in the rate of change of prices, though in practice it may be very difficult to tell the difference.
According to Austin, in light of the polices implemented by the previous Canadian government to restrict Chinese SOE investment into Canada, this SOE distinction is worth making at the level of government as well, if greater economic exchange with China is on the horizon for Canada.
In squeezing civil society and in effacing the distinction between levels of government, the President's vision would seem to leave little room for the development or maintenance of a rightly ordered relationship between the individual and the community.
Many of the theistic Saivites and especially the Vaishnavites realized that Shankara's distinctions between ontological and epistemological levels did not really alter the effect of his monistic position.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in naturOf paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in naturof thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in naturof the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in nature.
Its distinction from Mark's theology is not its origin, but its point of departure — perhaps from an earlier level than Mark's — and its transcendental or metaphysical development, which in the end left that of Mark far behind, though chronologically Mark is some years later than Paul.
According to the way of identity, man intuits himself and the divine as one, at least on the ultimate level; the way of distinction insists on distinguishing the reality of God from that of man at every level.
Attempts by the academic community to erase distinctions between levels of intensity, and the «ends» of which Aristotle spoke, leave little room for the civility that is one of our society's almost accidental inventions and one of its most cherished if precarious achievements.
We must ask whether the physical and historical continuity that evolutionary theory posits, in its picture of life and consciousness arising from a soup of chemicals, rubs out the hierarchical distinction of levels.7
In his main work, Difference and Repetition (1968), he has shown why the conception of concrete immediacy in and between occasions must not be considered naive in a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization of the world into the general and the individual in favor of the distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis of that which is subjected to a «law.»
At one level, the eighteenth century missionary interpretation drew a distinction between «home» and «abroad» with the implication that it is those «out there» who are in real need of the mission of the church.
In respect to the way these potentialities or «abstract entities» are actualized, Collingwood, however, makes a distinction between actualization on the conscious level of thought and on the non-conscious level of material reality.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view.Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view.of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view...
In regarding mental illness as symptomatic of the diseased general condition of humankind, faith relativizes the simplistically absolute distinction between the sick and the well, and calls attention to a deeper, less obvious level of selfhood.
In the first place, there is a wide zone of obscurity at the level of the zoological surface of hominization, seemingly impenetrable to our most searching methods of investigating the past, in which we can discern almost no outward evidence of the distinction between Irreflection and Reflection, although this had already been born.
What Niebuhr has done is to take the useful, practical distinction between intending my own good and intending the good of another without regard for self, and then to raise this distinction to the level of a metaphysical dualism between sacrificial and mutual love.
The distinction Hartshorne insists on making here as applied to our present question can be expressed by saying that, whereas mere experience or feeling of God can be not only direct but immediate, high - level thought or cognition of God, being mediated, as it is, by the conscious judgment or interpretation of such feeling, is of necessity mediate.
In the latter, a higher - level of actuality has emerged, thereby giving the society as a whole a unity of experience and activity Kim's position, however, does not allow for such a distinction: «Atoms and their mereological aggregates exhaust all of concrete existence....
That this is indeed to be expected follows from two other features of this metaphysical position: the distinction between lower and higher levels of individual actualities, and the distinction between genuine individuals and aggregational societies of such.
The former distinction mentioned above — that between lower and higher levels of individuals — suggests that the habits of the higher - level ones will be less binding, so that as scientists move to increasingly higher levels, the laws will become increasingly imprecise, gradually becoming what some would prefer to call mere «generalizations.»
The process of draining logic and meaning from everything came to full fruition in the 1960s and 1970s, when it began to be felt profoundly in the daily lives of many Americans, with such things as the proliferation of «alternative lifestyles,» the diluting or jettisoning of academic standards at every level, the increasing inability of the legal system to make in practice sufficient or consistent distinctions between victim and victimizer — among many others too familiar to all of us to need spelling out.
So what is first required is a distinction, right on the level of the «life world,» between genuine entities and «things,» rather than a reversion to microcosmic event - units.
It is also on the basis of this distinction, along with the notion that there are various levels of actualities, that Whitehead explains our common belief not only that some macroscopic beings have freedom, but also that some have more freedom than others.
This leads to a modification of Whitehead's notion of eternal objects, one in which the subject / object distinction is overcome even at the initial level of formation.
But perhaps he would think that the problem of the consciousness of the appraisals arises only because I am drawing too sharp a distinction between the primordial and consequent natures, a charge he levels at some of Whitehead's formulations (CNT 178).
From my point of view, at the level of creativity - esse, if God transcends the distinction between actuality and potentiality, then God must also transcend the distinction between finitude and infinitude.
That's a good distinction for advising day - care workers on how to treat a two - year - old who is throwing food, but many forms of discipline carry some level of force, especially when someone won't willingly cooperate with the «teaching moment.»
By rendering feeling as the interactive function of dative and concrescent actual entities, he can maintain that the subject - object distinction does not merely supervene at any special cognitive level and hence need not be identified either with the difference or the identity of knower and known.
And even evolutionary theory continues to rely upon the hierarchical distinctions of levels, though it envisages them as stages in a horizontally linear movement with the lines of demarcation somewhat blurred.
First, George mentions that Catholics do realize that Mary isn't the object of the sort of worship given to God but that «this distinction often seems to get lost at the local level
Now of course for Bradley the subject - object distinction can not be basic because it supervenes only at the cognitive or ideal level, i.e., only in the form of the knower - known relation.
To be sure, Whitehead's substratum does not involve any Bradleian ontological distinction between «levels» of Reality.
Hence, what for Bradley is a distinction between thought and sensation, which as such can only be established as a distinction between levels of reality, is for Whitehead a distinction between past and present, dative and con - crescent actual entities.
These helped conquer «the tyranny of distance,» as John C. Calhoun called it, and played a role in stimulating the great social changes of the time, including the advances in America's wealth and living standards, the spread of opportunity, the leveling of class distinctions, and the increase in popular suffrage.
Positing an ontological distinction at the foundational level of the physical individual always risks such a metaphysics - of - the - gaps which tends towards its more famous cousin, the god - of - the - gaps.
The chefs are now among only 68 culinary professionals to hold the distinction, the highest level of certification a U.S. chef -LSB-...]
I mean, hell man, the surprising level of athleticism we have seen just from his countless posters as a rookie, as well as setting 3 pt shooting records, while being a 7 footer, are qualifiers enough to call him a «unicorn», unless you want to argue about that opinionated distinction and what it actually means.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z