The J. Tuzo Wilson Distinguished Alumni Award recognizes outstanding alumni for their dedication to both enriching the lives of others through community service and achieving
a level of distinction in their professional field.
The award recognizes outstanding alumni for their dedication to enriching the lives of others through community service and achieving
a level of distinction in their professional field.
That they want to give their clients access to writers who have had to demonstrate their writing chops and earn a certain
level of distinction in their field.
This year marks the 13th year in a row the firm has received
this level of distinction.
Experience a new
level of distinction in the first five - star hotel to be newly built in Gstaad in 100 years.
Now you can add a whole new
level of distinction with the latest line of parts, components, and accessories from Chevrolet Performance.
This is the finishing touch that really adds
a level of distinction to your sign.
Unfortunately,
that level of distinction simply isn't enough for most businesses.
Earlier this year, Ladbrokes began taking wagers on students receiving their university degrees with certain
levels of distinction.
Just as colleges award diplomas with different
levels of distinction (summa cum laude, magna cum laude, cum laude), different types of high school diplomas could be offered depending on a student's performance on the CCSS assessment.
In recognition of outstanding work, the Smithsonian Women's Committee presents cash awards for Gold, Silver and Bronze
levels of distinction, Excellence in select categories as well as Exhibitors» Choice Awards.
The awards include Gold, Silver and Bronze
levels of distinction, Excellence within select categories (such as jewelry, glass, ceramics, etc.), as well as several Exhibitors» Choice Awards.
Not exact matches
Super Mario Run is listed as a free app in the App Store, but users who downloaded it were quick to discover that this
distinction applies to only the first three
levels of the game.
There is,
of course, a very important
distinction to be made between a permanent, but one - time, shift in the
level of prices and a persistent increase in the rate
of change
of prices, though in practice it may be very difficult to tell the difference.
According to Austin, in light
of the polices implemented by the previous Canadian government to restrict Chinese SOE investment into Canada, this SOE
distinction is worth making at the
level of government as well, if greater economic exchange with China is on the horizon for Canada.
In squeezing civil society and in effacing the
distinction between
levels of government, the President's vision would seem to leave little room for the development or maintenance
of a rightly ordered relationship between the individual and the community.
Many
of the theistic Saivites and especially the Vaishnavites realized that Shankara's
distinctions between ontological and epistemological
levels did not really alter the effect
of his monistic position.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in natur
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known
distinction between understanding and reason as two
levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in natur
of thinking, for involved in this
distinction is the view that logic, as it has been traditionally conceived, is merely a logic
of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in natur
of the understanding, and that reason, or speculative thinking, employs a higher, more inclusive logic, one that is «dialectical» in nature.
Its
distinction from Mark's theology is not its origin, but its point
of departure — perhaps from an earlier
level than Mark's — and its transcendental or metaphysical development, which in the end left that
of Mark far behind, though chronologically Mark is some years later than Paul.
According to the way
of identity, man intuits himself and the divine as one, at least on the ultimate
level; the way
of distinction insists on distinguishing the reality
of God from that
of man at every
level.
Attempts by the academic community to erase
distinctions between
levels of intensity, and the «ends»
of which Aristotle spoke, leave little room for the civility that is one
of our society's almost accidental inventions and one
of its most cherished if precarious achievements.
We must ask whether the physical and historical continuity that evolutionary theory posits, in its picture
of life and consciousness arising from a soup
of chemicals, rubs out the hierarchical
distinction of levels.7
In his main work, Difference and Repetition (1968), he has shown why the conception
of concrete immediacy in and between occasions must not be considered naive in a post-Hegelian sense, but post-Hegelian altogether.15 In order to achieve this aim, Deleuze replaces the categorization
of the world into the general and the individual in favor
of the
distinction of the universal and the singular.16 On the
level of abstraction, «mediation» describes the analysis
of that which is subjected to a «law.»
At one
level, the eighteenth century missionary interpretation drew a
distinction between «home» and «abroad» with the implication that it is those «out there» who are in real need
of the mission
of the church.
In respect to the way these potentialities or «abstract entities» are actualized, Collingwood, however, makes a
distinction between actualization on the conscious
level of thought and on the non-conscious
level of material reality.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known distinction between understanding and reason as two levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view.
Of paramount importance to the Hegelian perspective on this relation is the well - known
distinction between understanding and reason as two
levels of thinking, for involved in this distinction is the view.
of thinking, for involved in this
distinction is the view...
In regarding mental illness as symptomatic
of the diseased general condition
of humankind, faith relativizes the simplistically absolute
distinction between the sick and the well, and calls attention to a deeper, less obvious
level of selfhood.
In the first place, there is a wide zone
of obscurity at the
level of the zoological surface
of hominization, seemingly impenetrable to our most searching methods
of investigating the past, in which we can discern almost no outward evidence
of the
distinction between Irreflection and Reflection, although this had already been born.
What Niebuhr has done is to take the useful, practical
distinction between intending my own good and intending the good
of another without regard for self, and then to raise this
distinction to the
level of a metaphysical dualism between sacrificial and mutual love.
The
distinction Hartshorne insists on making here as applied to our present question can be expressed by saying that, whereas mere experience or feeling
of God can be not only direct but immediate, high -
level thought or cognition
of God, being mediated, as it is, by the conscious judgment or interpretation
of such feeling, is
of necessity mediate.
In the latter, a higher -
level of actuality has emerged, thereby giving the society as a whole a unity
of experience and activity Kim's position, however, does not allow for such a
distinction: «Atoms and their mereological aggregates exhaust all
of concrete existence....
That this is indeed to be expected follows from two other features
of this metaphysical position: the
distinction between lower and higher
levels of individual actualities, and the
distinction between genuine individuals and aggregational societies
of such.
The former
distinction mentioned above — that between lower and higher
levels of individuals — suggests that the habits
of the higher -
level ones will be less binding, so that as scientists move to increasingly higher
levels, the laws will become increasingly imprecise, gradually becoming what some would prefer to call mere «generalizations.»
The process
of draining logic and meaning from everything came to full fruition in the 1960s and 1970s, when it began to be felt profoundly in the daily lives
of many Americans, with such things as the proliferation
of «alternative lifestyles,» the diluting or jettisoning
of academic standards at every
level, the increasing inability
of the legal system to make in practice sufficient or consistent
distinctions between victim and victimizer — among many others too familiar to all
of us to need spelling out.
So what is first required is a
distinction, right on the
level of the «life world,» between genuine entities and «things,» rather than a reversion to microcosmic event - units.
It is also on the basis
of this
distinction, along with the notion that there are various
levels of actualities, that Whitehead explains our common belief not only that some macroscopic beings have freedom, but also that some have more freedom than others.
This leads to a modification
of Whitehead's notion
of eternal objects, one in which the subject / object
distinction is overcome even at the initial
level of formation.
But perhaps he would think that the problem
of the consciousness
of the appraisals arises only because I am drawing too sharp a
distinction between the primordial and consequent natures, a charge he
levels at some
of Whitehead's formulations (CNT 178).
From my point
of view, at the
level of creativity - esse, if God transcends the
distinction between actuality and potentiality, then God must also transcend the
distinction between finitude and infinitude.
That's a good
distinction for advising day - care workers on how to treat a two - year - old who is throwing food, but many forms
of discipline carry some
level of force, especially when someone won't willingly cooperate with the «teaching moment.»
By rendering feeling as the interactive function
of dative and concrescent actual entities, he can maintain that the subject - object
distinction does not merely supervene at any special cognitive
level and hence need not be identified either with the difference or the identity
of knower and known.
And even evolutionary theory continues to rely upon the hierarchical
distinctions of levels, though it envisages them as stages in a horizontally linear movement with the lines
of demarcation somewhat blurred.
First, George mentions that Catholics do realize that Mary isn't the object
of the sort
of worship given to God but that «this
distinction often seems to get lost at the local
level.»
Now
of course for Bradley the subject - object
distinction can not be basic because it supervenes only at the cognitive or ideal
level, i.e., only in the form
of the knower - known relation.
To be sure, Whitehead's substratum does not involve any Bradleian ontological
distinction between «
levels»
of Reality.
Hence, what for Bradley is a
distinction between thought and sensation, which as such can only be established as a
distinction between
levels of reality, is for Whitehead a
distinction between past and present, dative and con - crescent actual entities.
These helped conquer «the tyranny
of distance,» as John C. Calhoun called it, and played a role in stimulating the great social changes
of the time, including the advances in America's wealth and living standards, the spread
of opportunity, the
leveling of class
distinctions, and the increase in popular suffrage.
Positing an ontological
distinction at the foundational
level of the physical individual always risks such a metaphysics -
of - the - gaps which tends towards its more famous cousin, the god -
of - the - gaps.
The chefs are now among only 68 culinary professionals to hold the
distinction, the highest
level of certification a U.S. chef -LSB-...]
I mean, hell man, the surprising
level of athleticism we have seen just from his countless posters as a rookie, as well as setting 3 pt shooting records, while being a 7 footer, are qualifiers enough to call him a «unicorn», unless you want to argue about that opinionated
distinction and what it actually means.