«What California's resolve shows is that even if progress on climate change and clean energy is stymied at
the level of global governance or the nation - state, the subnationals can still move ahead to build a critical mass from below,» he wrote.
Not exact matches
The internet revolution
of the mid-1990s, the mushrooming
of partnerships and
of informal transnational
governance networks (grouping multibillion dollar foundations, like - minded politicians, NGOs, representatives
of the world
of finance, enterprises, academics...), globalisation under all its forms and the decentralisation and regionalisation strategy
of the UN effectively brought the
global agenda to the regional, national and local
levels.
Therefore,
global security and the security
of any state or culture need to be achieved through good
governance at all
levels that guarantees justice for all individuals, states, and cultures».
Global security, instead, has five dimensions that include human, environmental, national, transnational, and transcultural security, and, therefore, global security and the security of any state or culture can not be achieved without good governance at all levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.&
Global security, instead, has five dimensions that include human, environmental, national, transnational, and transcultural security, and, therefore,
global security and the security of any state or culture can not be achieved without good governance at all levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.&
global security and the security
of any state or culture can not be achieved without good
governance at all
levels that guarantees security through justice for all individuals, states, and cultures.»
5) A new high
level dialogue to discuss a joint vision for the
global governance in the area
of energy and climate change could be established within the «EU - China Strategic Partnership on Climate Change» in order to improve the EU's ability to conceive institutional frameworks that are likely to gather the necessary support.
The GOA - ON Requirements and
Governance Plan provides both broad concepts and key critical details on how to meet our high
level goals
of: 1) to improve our understanding
of global ocean acidification conditions; 2) to improve our understanding
of ecosystem response to ocean acidification; 3) and to acquire and exchange the data and knowledge necessary to optimize the modeling
of ocean acidification and its impacts.
I got the opportunity to talk to Dr. Georgios Kostakos: Executive Director
of the Foundation for
Global Governance and Sustainability (FOGGS); formerly Acting Deputy Executive Secretary
of the UN Secretary - General's High -
level Panel on
Global Sustainability (GSP); UN Secretariat staff at headquarters and in the field; Associate
of the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) and the University
of Athens.
It concludes that, while there are
governance constraints at the
global level, African countries need to work, with the support
of developed countries, towards stimulating effective domestic demand for climate adaptation and mitigation funds and improving the absorptive capacity
of African countries to effectively deploy climate funds.
Bringezu, S., Potočnik, J., Schandl, H., Lu, Y., Ramaswami, A., Swilling, M. and Suh, S., 2016: Multi-Scale
Governance of Sustainable Natural Resource Use — Challenges and Opportunities for Monitoring and Institutional Development at the National and
Global Level.
Many
of the world's leading
governance data producers are also included on the site, including top -
level indicators from Transparency International, World Bank Group, Freedom House,
Global Integrity, World Resources Institute, and others.
We see commitment to a number
of concepts: rule
of law at the national and international
levels, accountable and transparent institutions, responsive and participatory decision making at all
levels (it does not say
of what), participation in
global governance, access to information, fundamental freedoms, non-discrimination, and sustainable development.
Forward - looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results,
level of activity, performance or achievements
of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward - looking information, including but not limited to: risks related to changes in cryptocurrency prices; the estimation
of personnel and operating costs; general
global markets and economic conditions; risks associated with uninsurable risks; risks associated with currency fluctuations; competition faced in securing experienced personnel with appropriate industry experience and expertise; risks associated with changes in the financial auditing and corporate
governance standards applicable to cryptocurrencies and ICO's; risks related to potential conflicts
of interest; the reliance on key personnel; financing, capitalization and liquidity risks including the risk that the financing necessary to fund continued development
of the Company's business plan may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at all; the risk
of potential dilution through the issuance
of additional common shares
of the Company; the risk
of litigation.