Sentences with phrase «level valuation ranges»

The platform uses regression - based adjustments for location, time, and property characteristics, all while leveraging accurate automated valuation models (AVMs) and block - level valuation ranges to conduct automated checks of the final value.

Not exact matches

«Attaining a unicorn valuation appears to be a goal of promising companies raising money, as 35 percent of the companies we analyzed had valuations in the $ 1 billion to 1.1 billion dollar range, indicating that the companies may have negotiated specifically to attain the unicorn level.»

Moderate interest rates were associated with a whole range of subsequent returns over the following decade, and we know that those outcomes were 90 % correlated with the level of valuations at the beginning of those periods (on reliable measures such as market cap / GDP, price / revenue, Tobin's Q, the margin - adjusted Shiller P / E, and others we've presented over time - see Ockham's Razor and the Market Cycle).

In other words, if a very long - term investor is willing to rely on the notion that valuations when they sell will match or exceed the unusually high valuations of the present, that investor can reasonably expect stocks purchased at current levels to deliver long - term returns somewhere the range of 8 - 10 %.

A wide variety of investment processes can be employed to arrive at an investment decision, including both quantitative and fundamental techniques; strategies can be broadly diversified or narrowly focused on specific sectors and can range broadly in terms of levels of net exposure, leverage employed, holding period, concentrations of market capitalizations, and valuation ranges of typical portfolios.

On a wide range of historically reliable measures (having a nearly 90 % correlation with actual subsequent S&P 500 total returns), we estimate current valuations to be fully 118 % above levels associated with historically normal subsequent returns in stocks.

For some time we have believed that businesses with a narrower range of outcomes, or stable businesses, have been bid - up as bond substitutes, while businesses with a more cyclical profile have fallen to more attractive valuation levels.

«In our opinion, these valuation levels are attractive relative to historical trading ranges and the overall market.»

The historical evidence is clear that both the future return on stocks and their probable riskiness depends on the level of market valuation and the «uniformity» of market action (favorable trends across a wide range of indices).

Almost all of the factors and smart beta strategies exhibit a negative relationship between starting valuation and subsequent performance whether we use the aggregate measure or P / B to define relative valuation.9 Out of 192 tests shown here, not a single test has the «wrong» sign: in every case, the cheaper the factor or strategy gets, relative to its historical average, the more likely it is to deliver positive performance.10 For most factors and strategies (two - thirds of the 192 tests) the relationship holds with statistical significance for horizons ranging from one month to five years and using both valuation measures (44 % of these results are significant at the 1 % level).

It's called The Effect that Valuations Have on Long - Term Returns Is Consistent Across the Range of Valuation Levels.

At these valuation levels, it appears that a range of disruptive changes in the industry fundamentals are not being priced in, and that investors who simply buy these securities seeking income during the current long yield crisis, expecting dividend increases and generally a «safe» investment, could be vulnerable to a severe valuation contraction.

A wide variety of investment processes can be employed to arrive at an investment decision, including both quantitative and fundamental techniques; strategies can be broadly diversified or narrowly focused on specific sectors and can range broadly in terms of levels of net exposure, leverage employed, holding period, concentrations of market capitalizations and valuation ranges of typical portfolios.

The New School studies say that the SWR ranges from 2 percent to 9 percent; the long - term value proposition of stocks depends heavily on the valuation level that applies at the day of a stock purchase, according to an analytically valid examination of the historical data.

[The historical range does not include bubble level valuations.

Was on a team of 4 valuation analysts that evaluated companies from a private level that ranged from $ 50k - $ 100m in annual revenues