On the contrary, as the Oxburgh panel's final report (pdf) put it, the attacks
leveled against the scientists «showed a rather selective and uncharitable approach to information made available by the CRU.»
Not exact matches
AAAS President Susan Hockfield and APS President Laura H. Greene, whose scientific societies represent more than 170,000
scientists and engineers, called on Rouhani to step in and examine «irregularities» in the handling of charges
leveled against the a 45 - year - old Djalali.
New research conducted by
scientists at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health, found that higher
levels of antibody
against a different flu surface protein — neuraminidase (NA)-- were the better predictor of protection
against flu infection and its unpleasant side effects.
A VACCINE
against the Mexican swine flu sweeping the world is likely to arrive too late for most people, vaccine officials told New
Scientist between a flurry of high -
level industry meetings this week.
Six months later, the subjects returned and the
scientists drew blood and measured the
levels of antibodies
against the flu virus.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA —
Scientists from the Gladstone Institutes and the University of California, San Francisco report in the Journal of Neuroscience that raising
levels of the life - extending protein klotho can protect
against learning and memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.
Scientists first
leveled accusations
against the newly retracted paper in Scientific Reports, along with two others by the same researchers, earlier this month on Twitter.
Niedra broke with many other
scientists in a letter following an interview, writing that while Mills's theory butts up
against popular interpretations of quantum mechanics, «in fact, however, quantum mechanics may permit such [hydrino electron]
levels.»
A few years back,
scientists found that high - fiber foods «bang up
against the cells lining the gastrointestinal tract, rupturing their outer covering» which «increases the
level of lubricating mucus.»
In this study
scientists tested a placebo
against a combination of tribulus terrestris and other herbs (saw palmetto, indole -3-carbinol, chrysin); they detected no change in
levels of the «big T».
I am amazed that the same people who would not let me post my opinion about certain Dr. S., allow such a low
level personal attacks
against a fellow
scientist who contributed so extensively to our understanding of the atmosphere.
And at a more basic
level, what's wrong with
scientists «conspiring»
against «dissenting views» such as Soon's paper?
Really nothing to answer there, they were looking at a very specific set of charges
against Dr. Mann, which did not include the broader array of baseless charges
leveled against climate
scientists by the likes of McI.
Despite the recent accusations of fraud levied
against climate
scientists, respondents continue to place a high
level of trust in
scientists as sources of climate change information.
While actual
scientists are trying to piece together every little part of an otherwise almost un-piecable long term chaotic and variable system in response now to a massive increase in net lower atmospheric energy absorption and re radiation, Curry is busy — much like most of the comments on this site most of the time — trying to come up with or re-post every possible argument under the sun to all but argue
against the basic concept that radically altering the atmosphere on a multi million year basis is going to affect the net energy balance of earth, which over time is going to translate into a very different climate (and ocean
level) than the one we've comfortably come to rely on.
I know this goes
against the grain of many people in the blogosphere who want to think they are on the
level with
scientists on this issue, but I think they are massively deceived, if well - intentioned.
Reacting in outrage and disgust
against the personal attacks
leveled against them, and contriving to present their results in ways that could not be misread, the
scientists had used phrases that their attackers twisted to support the claim that climate science was nothing but a politicized sham.