Our State Landscape page ranks school districts by
their levels of adequate funding.
Why not strongly advocate for a base
level of adequate funding for all schools, and the taxes necessary to support this?
Not exact matches
Examples
of these risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to the impact
of: adverse general economic and related factors, such as fluctuating or increasing
levels of unemployment, underemployment and the volatility
of fuel prices, declines in the securities and real estate markets, and perceptions
of these conditions that decrease the
level of disposable income
of consumers or consumer confidence; adverse events impacting the security
of travel, such as terrorist acts, armed conflict and threats thereof, acts
of piracy, and other international events; the risks and increased costs associated with operating internationally; our expansion into and investments in new markets; breaches in data security or other disturbances to our information technology and other networks; the spread
of epidemics and viral outbreaks; adverse incidents involving cruise ships; changes in fuel prices and / or other cruise operating costs; any impairment
of our tradenames or goodwill; our hedging strategies; our inability to obtain
adequate insurance coverage; our substantial indebtedness, including the ability to raise additional capital to
fund our operations, and to generate the necessary amount
of cash to service our existing debt; restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness that limit our flexibility in operating our business; the significant portion
of our assets pledged as collateral under our existing debt agreements and the ability
of our creditors to accelerate the repayment
of our indebtedness; volatility and disruptions in the global credit and financial markets, which may adversely affect our ability to borrow and could increase our counterparty credit risks, including those under our credit facilities, derivatives, contingent obligations, insurance contracts and new ship progress payment guarantees; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; overcapacity in key markets or globally; our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel or the loss
of key personnel; future changes relating to how external distribution channels sell and market our cruises; our reliance on third parties to provide hotel management services to certain ships and certain other services; delays in our shipbuilding program and ship repairs, maintenance and refurbishments; future increases in the price
of, or major changes or reduction in, commercial airline services; seasonal variations in passenger fare rates and occupancy
levels at different times
of the year; our ability to keep pace with developments in technology; amendments to our collective bargaining agreements for crew members and other employee relation issues; the continued availability
of attractive port destinations; pending or threatened litigation, investigations and enforcement actions; changes involving the tax and environmental regulatory regimes in which we operate; and other factors set forth under «Risk Factors» in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and subsequent filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
So before we ever see federal
funding levels adequate to finance «real food,» «clean label» meals like those in this Minnesota district, it's going to take a truly seismic shift in how our nation thinks generally about food and the feeding
of its school children.
«I would imagine that many schools would simply not operate the program without a guaranteed,
adequate level of funding.»
b. Have an
adequate understanding
of what it takes (in terms
of skill types,
funding, tools, processes, materials, scheduled work plan, inter-business contractual agreements, top -
level commitment etc.) to advance the selected starting - point for the technical solution from its existing condition, to a point where it satisfies the requirement within a real engineering environment.
Money alone may not lift educational outcomes to desired
levels, but our findings confirm that the provision
of adequate funding may be critical.
It brings us back to Brown v. Board
of Education and forward to Abbott v. Burke, the New Jersey Supreme Court decision holding that an «
adequate» education, as required by the state constitution, requires a certain
level of per - pupil
funding.
The Minnesota Supreme Court has upheld the state's school - finance system, declaring that while
funding levels vary between districts, all
of the state's schoolchildren receive an
adequate education.
It is promoting «Teaching as a Profession» courses and, pending
adequate levels of funding, investing $ 100,000 in innovation grants for targeted districts to develop plans to recruit diversity in the teaching force.
The reality is that the continued pressure
of the budget caps exacerbates the pressure on Congress to cut, cut, cut and completely bypasses any realistic conversation about what the appropriate and
adequate funding levels are and should be.
The five school cases are part
of the firm's analysis
of the adequacy
of Vermont's school
funding system Using the Evidence - Based Method to Identify
Adequate Spending
Levels for Vermont Schools, which will be posted soon.
Designed to identify the
level of funding needed to deliver an
adequate education to every student in a state and sensitive to each child's needs, the Evidenced Based Model ensures that the distribution
of education
funding is equitable, and accounts for the cost
of overcoming «at risk» factors.
In ruling that the current
levels of funding are
adequate, the court has disregarded Texas children.
While public education spending is at historic
levels and is already the largest portion
of our state budget — about 55 percent overall (K - 12, community colleges, and IHL) and around 40 percent for K - 12 alone — legislative leaders have begun preparing to «fully
fund» the Mississippi
Adequate Education Program formula should Initiative 42 pass.
An outgrowth
of decades - long debates on equitable
funding of public schools is an effort to ensure that schools provide «
adequate levels of funding» for all students in a state (Augenblick, et al., 1997).
The 1988
funding levels were not based upon a valid analysis
of the actual costs
of providing a constitutionally
adequate, quality education; and there is no basis to conclude that merely restoring the 1988
funding level will provide
funding sufficient to meet the mandates
of the Education Clause, state education reform legislation, or the Consolidated State Plan.
An interesting observation in Texas is that some
of the state's wealthy districts had originally proposed that money did not make much difference but later complained that limited
funding did not enable them to provide an
adequate level of education for their students, especially their special needs students.
But the evidence convinces us that, while moving a school from intensive care to recovery is difficult, best practices married to district and community -
level commitment — supported by
adequate funding — can put the rescue
of many more troubled schools well within reach.
Achieving this LCFF
funding goal was never intended to mean that an
adequate level of financial support needed to deliver a quality education for California's K - 12 students had been provided.
Reporting in 2010 on the lack
of charter - school oversight in states throughout the country, the Office
of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department
of Education raised concerns that state -
level education departments were failing «to provide
adequate oversight needed to ensure that Federal
funds [were] properly used and accounted for.»
The letter calls on MPs to vote to ensure that all schools have an
adequate level of funding and that spending plans are «credible».
In our poorest districts, a child not yet in kindergarten would be out
of college before her school district reached an
adequate funding level.
It is our goal to provide financial leadership to the Chicago Board
of Education according to government regulations, Board policies and sound financial practices; to maintain the fiscal integrity
of the organization; to develop internal and external partnerships; to educate students in a safe and well - rounded environment; and to work with leaders at the federal, state, and local
levels to ensure
adequate funding and support for educational initiatives.
Unfortunately, many
of the most important features
of the plan, such as extended learning time in core subjects and a longer school day to include enrichment in art, music, and academic tutoring, were never
funded at
adequate levels by the state.
He also pointed to «a decade
of disinvestment» in California's schools, and said that the school finance plan still falls short
of what many regard as an «
adequate»
level of funding to ensure that children succeed at their optimal
levels.
Malloy is a founding member
of CCJEF coalition, which commissioned a June 2005 cost study demonstrating that 92
of Connecticut's 166 school districts fell short
of funding levels deemed to be necessary for providing children with an
adequate education, as demanded under Federal and State law.»
While these types
of formula structures can create a more uniform
level of funding among school districts across a state, they do not explicitly address the question
of whether the overall
funding level is
adequate to achieve desired educational outcomes.
School -
level factors include the strength
of school leadership and teaching, organizational management, access to
adequate facilities, and appropriate
funding and budgeting.
The goal was to ensure an
adequate level of funding in low - income school districts, regardless
of whether that was more than, the same as, or less than
funding levels in high - income districts.
According to JPS spokesman Sherwin Johnson, «the current [Mississippi
Adequate Education Program] formula uses a base student cost
of $ 5,381.52; at the current
funding level... our actual
funding is at $ 4,882.77 base student cost» — a difference that puts the district $ 498.75 in the hole for every student enrolled, a deficit that runs into the millions.
Funding the ABS to repeat the 1994 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Survey on a regular ongoing basis, to provide an
adequate measure
of changes in the
level of Indigenous disadvantage over time (Recommendation 34).
For instance, the attention to the
funding of NTRBs is a matter which does need urgent attention and the Commissioner supports the SLG's comments that «the
level of funding by the Commonwealth
of NTRBs needs to be reviewed to ensure that
adequate representation for native title parties is possible».
The Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation proposes, in the national strategy to overcome Indigenous disadvantage, that Commonwealth / State fiscal relations with Indigenous people could be improved by governments employing mechanisms to ensure
adequate funding; offering supplementary
funding incentives for meeting benchmarks agreed with Indigenous organizations (such as through federal Special Purpose Payments grants); pooling
funds across agencies and
levels of government; developing a joint agency approach to coordination
of services and programs; creating flexible
funding arrangements; ensuring geographic distribution
of funds; and through prioritising the allocation
of funds to community controlled services.
While currently
funded, the long - term sustainability
of these programs depends on
adequate levels of funding.
Strategies: Negotiate with government agencies to secure royalties from natural resources and facilitate sharing / promotion
of states resources; advocate on behalf
of Aboriginal people regarding expansion
of rights to access flora / fauna via Aboriginal Lands Act etc; increase employment
of Aborigines in all government
levels; ensure
adequate funding to provide legal services; establish mentoring programs / pro-active alternatives with communities / families.