The high
levels of aerosol pollution to be found in many regions of Asia up to and including the present day are well documented: see https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2018/01/economist-explains-19 and also https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/11/22/16666808/india-air-pollution-new-delhi
Indeed, conventional wisdom held that higher
levels of aerosol pollution in the atmosphere should cool the earth's climate because aerosols can increase cloudiness; they not only reduce precipitation, which raises the water content in clouds, but they also increase the size of the individual water droplets, which in turn causes more warming sunlight to be reflected back into space.
Not exact matches
The scientists expect further warming in the Arctic as
levels of greenhouse gases will continue to increase and
aerosol particle emissions will likely decrease to combat air
pollution in different parts
of the world.
India, another huge source
of atmospheric
pollution, recently allowed European scientists to measure its high -
level aerosols, an experiment that also includes flights into Nepal and Bangladesh.
During this event, the
aerosols stayed close to the surface due to the presence
of a anticyclone hovering over the study region at sea -
level, «reducing the amount
of shortwave irradiance reaching the surface and causing greater radiative cooling,» states Obregón, who likens the effects
of desert dust with those resulting from certain forest fires or episodes
of high
pollution.
By measuring the amount
of red and green in paintings, researchers have estimated past
aerosol pollution levels.
A study in mid-2012 found that the sky would look no different post-geoengineering than it currently does in urban areas, which have higher
levels of aerosols due to
pollution.
Tall smokestacks effectively reduce ground -
level air
pollution, but they do not reduce the cooling effect
of aerosol / particulate
pollution.
In the late 1970s the twin threats
of global cooling and acid rain were the impetuous for creating regulations to curb above - ground -
level aerosol / particulate
pollution.
That seems the clearest statement yet
of the real problem == is there anything that can replace current
levels of air
pollution, if high sulfur coal and oil are phased out for respiratory health reasons, that would make up for the loss
of the
aerosols» negative forcing on global temperature?
This is true, and has been attributed to higher
levels of pollution aerosol particles, which commonly cause 20 % decreases in UV - B radiation in the summer (Wenny et.