Misled parents and young manipulated students have no True North (to use the last post's metaphor) to be a tip off to the presence or
level of coercion.
It is assumed that PMTO reduces
the level of coercion, which sets the stage for a massive increase in positive social interaction.
Not exact matches
Hence, what Hare and Madden seem to expect from a loving God is a more direct and bold use
of coercion on his part in controlling certain low -
level aims and desires in the interest
of the higher
level.
More specifically, I want to discuss the following question: When, if ever, is it justifiable for a process theist to use, or condone the use
of,
coercion of this sort on the human
level?
I have not argued that process theists can not consistently allow for the justifiable use
of coercion at the human
level.
But if process theists really do believe that some
coercion would not only be preferable but required at the divine
level if it were possible, then it appears that they must also acknowledge that the God
of process theism would coerce if this were an option.
This is why God sometimes approves
of (lures us toward)
coercion on the human
level even though such coercive power would never be used by God even if it were available.
Moreover, it certainly does create a strong theological justification for the type
of coercion many process theists believe is necessary on the human
level.
Coercion is readily understood on the experiential
level of social or physical behavior, but its proper metaphysical definition is difficult to ascertain.
At the ontological
level, the
level of efficient causality, divine persuasion is not operative; «forbearance would mean non-existence...» But once humanity is created and God resolves to relate himself to humankind in terms
of persuasion and not
coercion, God «would have to be uncertain about a number
of details
of the future... and in some respects unable to accomplish his will at all.»
It is certainly possible that God, at the
level of creativity - characterization, may have other powers in addition to persuasion and
coercion.
To prevent the exploitation or
coercion of research participants, universities and other organizations conducting or sponsoring research require that all researchers who intend to use data collected from human subjects be familiar with national and state -
level guidelines for working with human subjects data.
On one
level a genre mash - up revelling in influences as diverse as John Carpenter, Night
of the Living Dead and The Stepford Wives, it also ambitiously holds a mirror up to the history
of modern America, confronting not overt racism (that would be too easy, not to mention predictable) but a more insidious narrative
of coercion and white supremacy whose legacy stretches back across the generations.
For one thing, what began as incentives for states to adopt common standards in English and math has risen to the
level of what may well be illegal
coercion.
Obviously, at that
level of cognition no external
coercion is required to get people to choose the best alternative.
We have sunk to Soviet
levels of professional
coercion.
But this amounts to massive
coercion for example by coercing future inhabitants
of Florida to abandon half
of their state when sea
levels rise.
A much wiser approach would be to allow the US market for electricity to determine whether more or fewer solar panels are needed without any subsidies or
coercion since the basis for fearing catastrophic effects from increasing
levels of carbon dioxide is scientifically invalid.
Also, this
level of petty
coercion is an indicator that the consensus is losing the political battles.
Immediate post-treatment factors predicting negative outcomes (delinquent acts) were maternal reports
of behavior problems and observed mother — child
coercion, indicating that in families where
levels of parent - child
coercion are still high post-treatment, further intervention may be warranted to prevent future problems.
This pathway is characterized by three elements: the onset
of conduct problems (such as developmentally excessive
levels of aggression, noncompliance, and other oppositional behaviour) in the preschool and early school - age years; a high degree
of continuity throughout childhood and into adolescence and adulthood; and a poor prognosis.1, 2 The most comprehensive family - based formulation for the early - starter pathway has been the
coercion model developed by Patterson and his colleagues.3, 4 The model describes a process
of «basic training» in conduct - problem behaviours that occurs in the context
of an escalating cycle
of coercive parent - child interactions in the home, beginning prior to school entry.