Sentences with phrase «levels of efficiency because»

Solar cells based on cadmium and tellurium could move closer to theoretical levels of efficiency because of some sleuthing by researchers at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Most people would not agree with this level of efficiency because finance researchers have shown evidence of insider trading where insiders can earn a return without taking any risk because they knew something the public did not.

Not exact matches

American manufacturing output is at the highest level in history and employment has fallen because of large gains in efficiency, a trend that is unlikely to reverse.

Credit is growing more slowly than it has in the past but not because the financial system has become more efficient but simply because debt levels have become too high, causing regulators to force down the growth in credit without seriously improving the efficiency of the financial sector.

We keep Jack because he is all Arsenal and he's British, but in terms of efficiency, his level is not of the standard required.

Zinc is vital in healing because it lowers chronic levels of inflammation and increases the efficiency of the immune system — preventing bacteria on the skin from becoming inflamed.

This alkaline level promotes health because enzymes perform at optimum efficiency in the cells at this pH. Water washes out the acidity of the cell and makes the cell interior alkaline.

Because modern foods do not provide the levels of vitamins and minerals we need for maximum metabolic efficiency, the world's most prestigious medical publication recommends that all Americans use a multiple vitamin and mineral supplement every day.

Unlike the Toyota Prius, a runaway hit because it strikes the right balance between practicality, adequate performance and superior fuel efficiency, Honda erred with the Accord Hybrid by falling below hybrid - level fuel economy levels and with the Insight because of impracticality.

The same can be applied to finance, where the is a level of efficiency below which we should not go, because of ordinary volatility.

This behavior could be related to market efficiency because higher information levels characteristic of large - cap stocks could drive less differentiation between active funds» performance; i.e., they inherently may have less active risk.

Because technical analysis uses price and volume information, all three levels of efficiency state that an investor would be unable to earn an abnormal return with this information.

But if we can continue to reduce NOx — by targeting industrial emissions and improving agricultural efficiencies — then at some point the effect of temperature won't matter, because high O3 levels can not occur in the absence of substantial NOx concentrations.

In passenger cars at low partial loads, a higher swirl level (partial closing of the filling port in a four - valve cylinder head) can lead to a better particle / NOx trade - off, whereby consumption as well as CO emissions increase because of the deterioration in volumetric efficiency [1].

The renewable energy findings from the ISO's analysis should be front and center, particularly because higher renewable energy levels are more consistent with New England states» policies, which call for increasing levels of renewable energy as well as energy efficiency.

Here's where this «loophole of uncertainty» comes into play - because China has implemented actions that address climate change through its Eleventh Five - Year Plan since 2005 and has internally funding all of its energy efficiency measures and mitigation actions (and furthermore hasn't asked for any funding with regards to their 40 - 45 % reduction in carbon intensity by 2020 from 2005 levels), China would therefore be exempt from international MRV if this text is eventually agreed upon.

This is a little more complicated than it looks, because there are many technologies, and many levels of efficiency.

Indirect rebound refers to cases where the savings from efficiency gains are used to purchase other energy - intensive goods and services, either at the individual level or because of increased economic activity across society.

Thirdly, I would dispute the interpretation that standardisation is «co-regulation», because the EU legislator has not entrusted European Standards Organisations (ESOs) with the use of their privilege to set an acceptable level of risks for all stakeholders in the society, whatever the EU regulatory purpose (health and safety, environment protection, energy efficiency, etc...).

What will not work, and can not work, is trying to accomplish the same goal of efficiency by quintupling the number of lawyers per capita because then there is not enough work to go around and the bar can not sustain itself at fair levels of income without being extremely inefficient.