Sentences with phrase «liability attorneys take»

At the Doane Law Office, LLC, our Jeffersonville product liability attorney takes product liability cases seriously.

Not exact matches

However, county Democratic party leaders said Tuesday that the seriousness of the state attorney general's allegations demands swift action be taken to protect the county against further liability.

The county executive's office shared a letter from the county attorney, advising the comptroller that, if he took this action, he «overstepped his charter defined duties» and may carry risk of personal liability.

Topics to be discussed include: Court Procedure: An understanding of the civil litigation process in New Jersey as it pertains to negligence claims; Damages: Understanding the standards for, and the differences between Compensatory and Punitive Damages; Facility Maintenance: Identifying potential safety hazards related to facilities and grounds, and taking reasonable steps to address common problems; Indemnification: Identifying when the school district is responsible for the actions of its employees, and when it may disclaim coverage; Insurance Coverage Issues: Understanding what is, and is not covered under a school district's insurance policy, and understanding whether your district will be allowed to choose its attorney or be required to utilize the attorney assigned by the Insurance Company; Negligent Supervision: Examples of school district negligence liability lie within the school, on the athletic field, in the locker room, and on school trips; Sovereign Immunity: Understanding the effect of the New Jersey Torts Claims Act on negligence claims against school districts.

A Louisville premises liability attorney can help a person suffering from a premises liability case is to act quickly, to encourage the client to take photos, to take photos of any improvements that are made after the fact by the person that is at fault, to take photos of his or her injury, and to keep a journal of his or her suffering.

The product liability attorneys at The Cochran Firm are here to take your case and help you secure the total compensation you are due.

The knowledgeable Indiana personal injury attorneys at the law firm of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse have extensive experience representing clients in a wide range of Indiana premises liability and other personal injury cases, and they know what it takes to be successful on their clients» behalf.

Connecticut products liability laws are very favorable to consumers, and an experienced New Canaan personal injury attorney can help injured people take advantage of these rights.

The attorneys with The Cochran Firm — Dothan have experience taking on big business in a wide range of complicated products liability cases.

Thoroughly experienced in product liability law, Brouse attorneys who practice in this area also advise clients of the steps they can take in advance to protect themselves and reduce the risk or extent of potential liability.

The Fontana personal injury attorney from the firm also takes on premises liability claims, and many others.

The Cochran Firm, D.C. expressly disclaims all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based upon any information or other contents of this website and any website or Internet property operated by The Cochran Firm, D.C. Viewing cochranfirmdc.com or any other Internet property operated by The Cochran Firm, D.C., or communicating with The Cochran Firm, D.C. by Internet e-mail or through this site, does not constitute or create an attorney - client relationship with anyone.

Because of this, and the fact that gathering adequate evidence to prove pharmaceutical liability can take time, it's highly recommended that you contact an experienced personal injury attorney as soon as possible when you become the victim of a defective pharmaceutical.

While liability will take years to sort out, attorneys are wasting no time jockeying for a place in the courtroom.

Our San Diego attorneys take all product liability cases on a contingency basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case.

We have a full understanding of what it takes to secure results as plaintiffs» and as defense attorneys in a variety of product liability cases.

Many personal injury lawsuits involve defendants failing to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable injuries and our dedicated attorneys have the legal training and access to resources necessary to prove liability.

This length of time may vary depending on the complexity of the issues involved, and our Croal Gables premises liability attorney can give you a better idea of how long it will take when you call for a free consultation.

If there is a question as to how the incident occurred, the attorney will take the necessary steps to investigate the liability portion of the claim.

Determining the property owner's liability takes an attorney experienced with premises liability cases.

Your attorney will take a close look at the driver when investigating the accident to determine liability.

The skilled personal injury and wrongful death attorneys at the Indiana law firm of Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse have decades of experience handling product liability cases and know what it takes to be successful in Indiana courts.

The attorney's self - interest is better served by refusing to take on any more liability than absolutely necessary.

This problem is particularly compounded by the fact that most attorneys will not consider or take any issue regarding total loss, coverage, property damage, and liability if there is not an actual injury involved.

Liability coverage takes care of those fees, and your Holland renters insurance provider will appoint an attorney to handle all negotiations and court proceedings.

This can be a win - win for all parties involved since the client will be adequately represented and the attorneys» participation will take pressure and liability off of the sales associate.

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained