Sentences with phrase «liability case arising»

Go Motorboards v. EnerSys: He was lead trial counsel for EnerSys in a product liability case arising out of the sale of batteries to an electric scooter manufacturer.

We obtained a defense verdict in a product strict liability case arising from an LP gas explosion and fire that occurred in Hardeeville, South Carolina.

Lightfoot attorneys Adam Peck and JT Thompson obtained a defense verdict for Leroy - Somer in a premises liability case arising out of an accident that had occurred at its facility in Lexington, Tennessee on September 8, 2008.

-- Confidential settlement of a products liability case arising out of contaminated food.

Lightfoot attorneys defended an aircraft manufacturer in a product liability case arising from an allegedly defectively designed aircraft.

Lightfoot attorneys defended a valve manufacturer in a South Carolina product liability case arising from an LP gas explosion.

$ 3,100,000 SETTLEMENT — Product Liability This case arose after a tricycle malfunction caused serious injury to a child.

Premises liability cases arise in situations where an occupier or owner of land owes a duty to a person.

Premises liability cases arise from accidents on private, public, and commercial property caused by negligence on behalf of the property owner.

Not exact matches

In some cases these research opportunities arose from a joint venture between BPRU and a pharmaceutical company in the interest of furthering research, such as testing the abuse liability of a novel compound.

Limitation of liability of the European CanCer Organisation: in the event of it being impossible for ECCO - the European CanCer Organisation to carry out the meeting for force majeure cases (strikes, fires, damages, or other fatal occurences), so long as this arises from a cause not attributable to ECCO - the European CanCer Organisation, then the Organisation shall only be obliged to reimburse the payments received subject to deduction of any costs it has incurred in preparing the event.

In no case shall Slickster Magazine, our directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, interns, suppliers, service providers or licensors be liable for any injury, loss, claim, or any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special, or consequential damages of any kind, including, without limitation lost profits, lost revenue, lost savings, loss of data, replacement costs, or any similar damages, whether based in contract, tort (including negligence), strict liability or otherwise, arising from your use of any of the service or any products procured using the service, or for any other claim related in any way to your use of the service or any product, including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in any content, or any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of the service or any content (or product) posted, transmitted, or otherwise made available via the service, even if advised of their possibility.

There are comparatively few liability scenarios that arise out of an earthquake, so most people are worried about their personal property in this case.

We will only accept liability for incidents that arise as a direct result of our proven negligence, or that of our suppliers, in respect of arrangements forming part of your holiday itinerary, in cases where all your holiday accommodation and transfers are arranged by us for the entire extent of your stay.

The only difference is that a «No Contest» plea can not be used as evidence of civil liability in a civil case arising from the same incident.

In light of those remarks, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers should consider the issue of tort liability arising from cases of school bullying.

While much of his practice has focused on the litigation of mass / toxic tort matters, product liability and premises liability, Tim has also handled cases arising out of maritime and port operations.

Injury Trial Lawyers, APC has the expertise and resources to handle every kind of premise liability case, even those that arise when you are injured at a zoo due to hazards involving wild animal enclosures.

d. Of the overlapping technical issues arising in product liability cases relating to the specific types of technologically advanced products that we defend, which overlapping of issues facilitates our development and maintenance of our extreme knowledge.

Our commitment to gaining & maintaining extreme knowledge: a. Of Texas substantive product liability law; b. Of Texas & federal expert exclusionary law; c. Of how to destroy adverse experts during deposition & trial cross examination, and through the use of testing, demonstrations, statistical, and other technical evidence presented by a team of highest quality experts; d. Of the overlapping technical issues arising in product liability cases relating to the specific types of technologically advanced products that we defend, which overlapping of issues facilitates our development and maintenance of our extreme knowledge.

Common Duluth personal injury cases arise primarily because of auto - collisions, trucking accidents, premise liability, and wrongful death.

While privacy issues most often arise in an employment context, we are also called upon to advise in a wide range of matters, including commercial transactions, medical liability cases, matters involving new technologies, and class actions.

Our premises liability lawyers handle all types of cases arising from accidents on personal, commercial, or public property.

Therefore, if your truck accident arose because of products liability issues, then you must understand and follow these rules when you attempt to bring your case.

Wallace v. Case Western Reserve University et al., Cuyahoga C.P. No. 06 CV 591169: Represented CWRU in premises liability, survivorship, and wrongful death actions arising from a college campus shooting and hostage situation.

One issue that can arise in a product liability case is the notion of «legacy equipment» liability.

The high court is also unimpressed with the fact that the drug giving rise to the product liability was distributed by a California company, presumably because the cause of action in question in the case was brought against the manufacturer as a strict liability defective product claim, rather than as a claim against a seller of the product arising from a warranty that the product was free of defects arising under the Uniform Commercial Code or an express warranty.

In this particular case, which concerns liability for damages arising from the provision of a medical product, two important applicable principles come into conflict and have to be reconciled.

2008)-- Denial of manufacturer defendant's motion for summary judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut on grounds that there existed genuine issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts of case against manufacturer based on its claimed failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information of risks involved in the transport and storage of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.

TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software AND / OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software WEB SITE, WITH THE DELAY OR INABILITY TO USE THE SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software WEB SITE OR RELATED SERVICES, THE PROVISION OF OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SERVICES, OR FOR ANY INFORMATION, SOFTWARE, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND RELATED GRAPHICS OBTAINED THROUGH THE SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software WEB SITE, OR OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THE SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software WEB SITE, WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF SmartAdvocate ® - The best plaintiff personal injury case management software OR ANY OF ITS SUPPLIERS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF DAMAGES.

In addition, he has litigated substantial cases arising under liability, marine, boiler and machinery, and builders» risk policies.

Issues often arise in pursuing a personal injury claim in these types of cases because liability can often be difficult to assess given the number of parties involved.

Examples of his recent case - load are: led by Ed Pepperall QC in a large - scale action arising from a defective share sale; defended solicitors from allegations arising from property transactions, including alleged breaches of the Etridge guidance; acting for a claimant against solicitors who negligently handled his litigation; defending an IFA from allegations of inappropriately risky investment advice; acting for solicitors claiming contributions from another firm in respect of their own liability for breach of trust; advising clients on a claim against surveyors for losses arising from negligent property valuations.

Below is an overview of several examples of defendants in an auto accident case and liability issues that could arise for each of them.

This representation includes litigating the full range of issues that arise in the health care setting, including professional liability, commercial, employment and reimbursement cases.

In addition, the firm is representing some 15 European investors whose claims total more than $ 300 million in a massive case arising from the professional liability of auditors in the Castor Holdings case.

Many of his cases arise from breach of contract, copyright and trademark infringement, right of publicity, false advertising, intermediary liability (DMCA and CDA § 230), privacy, defamation, IP licensing and chain of title matters.

The Killino Firm's auto accident and defective - products lawyer has extensive experience with cases arising out of injuries and deaths caused by motor - vehicle defects, including a product - liability action that led to the recall of 450,000 defective Chinese - manufactured tires.

Damian also undertakes other liability work for major insurers, under public liability policies, including product liability cases and claims arising out of property damage.He has considerable experience of acting in claims against Independent Financial Advisers, investment managers, accountants, actuaries and other professionals associated with the financial services sector, as well as solicitors and insurance brokers.

Indiana has a similar proof burden requirement in these premises liability cases, and this issue arose in a recent case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

This article highlights leading or significant cases that LAWPRO litigated over the past 20 years, some of which dealt with legal issues and principles that are relevant far beyond the professional liability issues that arose in the individual claim.

The Citrus County Brain Injury Attorneys at Whittel & Melton handle all types of brain injury cases including those that arise from car accidents, motorcycle accidents, medical malpractice and premises liability.

Issues related to premise liability cases, slip - and - fall accidents, and other issues that may arise at the home of another person are complex and confusing.

The Killino Firm's car - accident and defective - products lawyers have extensive experience with cases arising out of injuries and deaths caused by motor - vehicle defects, including a product - liability action that led to the recall of 450,000 defective Chinese - manufactured tires.

This background, combined with my construction law and litigation and real estate knowledge, provides me with a unique skill set to handle a variety of issues that arise in premises liability actions and with a unique ability to handle your case.

Recent cases handled include a multimillion - dollar recovery arising from construction and design claims, a multimillion - dollar recovery relating to professional malpractice, successful defense of a financial institution from multimillion - dollar lender liability claims, successful defense of independent directors from claims of breach of fiduciary duty and related claims, and a multimillion - dollar recovery in the telecommunications industry arising from claims of breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and fraud.

Although the employers in both cases were cleared of defamation charges, the Court did confirm that in other circumstances liability could have arisen.

Cases include in particular disputes arising out of pharmaceutical products liability.

She has also been involved in litigating small business break - ups, construction litigation, insurance coverage disputes, product liability cases, personal injury matters and disputes arising from trusts and estates.

The court explained that the state where the accident arose does not use a strict liability theory for product liability cases, so a plaintiff must proceed under an implied warranty or negligence theory.