Sentences with phrase «liability companies as»

The proposed solution to these issues is the utilization of limited liability companies as a holding vehicles.

Alliant Advisors, Inc., Hoffman Estates • IL 2003 — 2010 Accounting Manager Accountable for all aspects of client engagements for small to medium sized business enterprises, including preparation of financial statements, financial statement analysis, operational analysis, preparation of business income tax returns for corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies as well as sole proprietorships.

Squadron, a Brooklyn Democrat, pushed this week have a vote in the Senate Corporations Committee to consider his bill, which would reclassify limited liability companies as corporations under the campaign finance law in order to close what many campaign finance advocates see as a major loophole in the current law.

Cuomo has previously called for an end to the so - called loophole in election law that allows unlimited donations through limited liability companies as well as limits to the amount of money state lawmakers can earn outside of public service.

In the case of billionaire real estate developer Leonard Litwin, described as «Developer - 1» in the complaint against Silver, the firm represented at least five different limited liability companies as five different clients, according to data maintained by the New York City Tax Commission.

He wants to create a public financing system, limit donations to housekeeping committees to $ 25,000, require bimonthly instead of semiannual disclosure, and close the «LLC loophole» that treats limited liability companies as individuals for the purpose of determining contribution limits.

In June 2013, he proposed lowering that limit to $ 1,000 and applying it to limited - liability companies as well.

These developers frequently gave through use of the «L.L.C. loophole,» which treats limited liability companies as individuals for the purpose of calculating contribution limits.

Dig Deeper: Choosing the Limited Liability Company as Your Corporate Form Case Study: Why an S Corp Might Be the Better Choice While Turner's story is a compelling one for a smaller, lifestyle business, the truth is that fast - growing businesses that plan to bring on investors or share the ownership of the company with employees may need to consider making the switch to an S corp sooner rather than later.

The funds were funneled through a Howe - controlled limited liability company as checks made out to Percoco's wife.

Economically, this would be equivalent to transferring her 5 % interest to a limited liability company with no assets other than the 5 % interest in the house, and then having you and the limited liability company as co-signers on the new mortgage, rather than having her sign in her individual capacity.

This is true whether you own the property outright, or indirectly own it through a limited partnership or limited liability company as is common in some crowdfunding investments.

Not exact matches

Non-public pass - through businesses, such as sole proprietorships, limited liability companies and partnerships, pay no income tax themselves.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

Working 60 hours straight without sleep isn't a badge of honor, it's a mark of stupidity, and a sign to me as an investor that you might be a potential liability to your company.

Statutory capital and surplus represents the excess of an insurance company's admitted assets over its liabilities, including loss reserves, as determined in accordance with statutory accounting practices.

There are some restrictions on the types of business that you can set up as a limited - liability company.

Small businesses — namely, pass - through entities such as S corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs)-- get a break, too.

Every Friday afternoon, Phunware's controller emails an overview of the company's financials to the management team, including data on key metrics such as cash on hand, obligations, and the quick ratio, which the company derives from dividing cash plus receivables by current liabilities.

Over seventy percent of U.S. companies are structured as pass - through entities, such as S - corporations and limited liability corporations (LLCs).

But as the company grew from 30 to 150 people, Kagan couldn't adapt, his issues got the better of him, and he was deemed more of a liability than an asset.

In the United States, more than 2.4 million small businesses are set up as a limited liability company (LLC) for the purpose of limiting personal liability and protecting the owner's personal assets in the event of business failure.

As a result of the final ruling, during the first quarter of 2017, the company recorded a pre-tax impact of $ 58 million due to the non-cash reversal of Cadbury - related accrued liabilities related to this matter.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

«We see weak core free cash flow as too structurally challenged to de-lever the balance sheet, leaving the company prone to risks around further contingent liabilities, and / or capital markets volatility.»

People, person, or persons as used in this Constitution does not include corporations, limited liability companies or other corporate entities established by the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state, and such corporate entities are subject to such regulation as the people, through their elected state and federal representatives, deem reasonable and are otherwise consistent with the powers of Congress and the States under this Constitution.

For example, if the firm has $ 500,000 in current assets and $ 350,000 in current liabilities, then $ 150,000 is free and clear as working capital, available for spending on new things as needed by the company.

Here's the best part, at least for owners: As long as the $ 4 million is reinvested in what's called «qualified replacement property» — stock in U.S. companies or bonds, but not passive investments like mutual funds — an owner can defer paying what might otherwise be a hefty capital gains tax liabilitAs long as the $ 4 million is reinvested in what's called «qualified replacement property» — stock in U.S. companies or bonds, but not passive investments like mutual funds — an owner can defer paying what might otherwise be a hefty capital gains tax liabilitas the $ 4 million is reinvested in what's called «qualified replacement property» — stock in U.S. companies or bonds, but not passive investments like mutual funds — an owner can defer paying what might otherwise be a hefty capital gains tax liability.

The UK firms Reuters identified were either UK - registered companies or Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) whose directors were foreign - based individuals representing many companies or whose members were companies registered at legal offices in low tax jurisdictions such as Vanuatu or the Seychelles.

As Businessweek writes, «Tech giants and other corporations that have grown by serial acquisition fear the Actelion precedent could expose them — at least in California — to open - ended liability over licensing disputes involving the smaller new - technology companies they are wont to gobble up like so many cocktail nuts.»

When it comes to starting a business you intend to grow, it can make sense to launch as a limited liability company, or LLC.

Limited - liability companies, a new corporate option in many states, have been gaining popularity, but there are still tax benefits and other financial advantages to S and C corporate structures as well.

In 2013, for example, the companies petitioned the IRS to restructure as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), switching from their previous designations as class C corporations and effectively reducing their corporate tax liabilities to zero.

We can interpret a debt - equity ratio of 0.5 as saying that the company is using $ 0.50 of liabilities in addition to each $ 1 of shareholders» equity in the business.

However, these tax savings apply only to C corporations, and the majority of small business is conducted as one form or another of pass - through entities — partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs) taxed as partnerships or S corporations.

Known as the limited - liability company (LLC), this structure offers the best of all corporate worlds for many new businesses: personal - asset protection (normally available only to shareholders of C corporations), elimination of corporate - level taxes (a benefit normally reserved for partners or S - corporation owners), and flexible ownership rules (which S corporations in particular lack).

Set higher safety standards for companies operating offshore as well as those operating pipelines, and increase the required liability insurance;

The net value of his cash investments is included as a liability and includes more than 250 million yuan ($ 40 million) in dividends collected through December 2017, based on company filings and an analysis of Bloomberg data.

TriLinc Global Impact Fund, LLC (the «Company») was organized as a Delaware limited liability company on April 30, 2012 and formally commenced operations on June 11Company») was organized as a Delaware limited liability company on April 30, 2012 and formally commenced operations on June 11company on April 30, 2012 and formally commenced operations on June 11, 2013.

(a) Schedule 2.7 (a) of the Disclosure Schedule contains a list setting forth each employee benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement (including any «employee benefit plan» as defined in Section 3 (3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended («ERISA»)(«ERISA Plan»)-RRB-, including, without limitation, employee pension benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (2) of ERISA, multi-employer plans, as defined in Section 3 (37) of ERISA, employee welfare benefit plans, as defined in Section 3 (1) of ERISA, deferred compensation plans, stock option plans, bonus plans, stock purchase plans, fringe benefit plans, life, hospitalization, disability and other insurance plans, severance or termination pay plans and policies, sick pay plans and vacation plans or arrangements, whether or not an ERISA Plan (including any funding mechanism therefore now in effect or required in the future as a result of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise), whether formal or informal, oral or written, under which (i) any current or former employee, director or individual consultant of the Company (collectively, the «Company Employees») has any present or future right to benefits and which are contributed to, sponsored by or maintained by the Company or (ii) the Company or any ERISA Affiliate (as hereinafter defined) has had, has or may have any actual or contingent present or future liability or obligation.

«Total CEO realized compensation» for a given year is defined as (i) Mr. Musk's salary, cash bonuses, non-equity incentive plan compensation and all other compensation as reported in «Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table» below, plus (ii) with respect to any stock option exercised by Mr. Musk in such year in connection with which shares of stock were also sold other than to satisfy the resulting tax liability, if any, the difference between the market price of Tesla common stock at the time of exercise on the exercise date and the exercise price of the option, plus (iii) with respect to any restricted stock unit vested by Mr. Musk in such year in connection with which shares of stock were also sold other than automatic sales to satisfy the Company's withholding obligations related to the vesting of such restricted stock unit, if any, the market price of Tesla common stock at the time of vesting, plus (iv) any cash actually received by Mr. Musk in respect of any shares sold to cover tax liabilities as described in (ii) and (iii) above, following the payment of such amounts.

As a result of the acquisition of ChoiceVendor, the Company recorded intangible assets of $ 5,153,000, which was comprised of $ 3,259,000 related to workforce in place, $ 1,470,000 related to developed technology, and $ 424,000 related to non-compete agreements, and net liabilities of $ 164,000.

A view that U.S. insurance companies may find it easier to manage their long - dated liabilities as interest rates adjust towards a more «normal» regime.

The quotes are based on a basic liability protection policy for the 2011 Toyota Camry across 12 insurers, including both national (such as GEICO and State Farm) and regional (such as Western National Insurance and Farmers Mutual of Nebraska) companies.

The net debt to earnings before interest, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) ratio is a measurement of leverage, calculated as a company's interest - bearing liabilities minus cash or cash equivalents, divided by its EBITDA.

A company with negative working capital (more liabilities than assets) is generally seen as being in financial risk for increased debt (which may lead to bankruptcy).

It is defined as the difference between a company's current assets and current liabilities.

As mentioned above, working capital deals with a company's current assets and current liabilities only.

You state that the Investment Vehicle will likely be structured as a limited liability company or limited partnership, and will be responsible for all organizational costs and expenses associated with its formation and the investment in the Portfolio Company.4 You also state that AngelList Advisors will provide the initial capital required to pay such organizational costs and excompany or limited partnership, and will be responsible for all organizational costs and expenses associated with its formation and the investment in the Portfolio Company.4 You also state that AngelList Advisors will provide the initial capital required to pay such organizational costs and exCompany.4 You also state that AngelList Advisors will provide the initial capital required to pay such organizational costs and expenses.

A company with positive working capital (more assets than liabilities) is seen as being in good short - term financial health.