Sentences with phrase «liability for fraudulent charges»

Your credit cards generally leave you with zero liability for fraudulent charges as long as you report the fraud.

This stems in large part from new credit card rules that went into effect in October 2015, requiring merchants to upgrade their equipment to accept EMV chip cards or face liability for fraudulent charges made with EMV cards.

If your card is lost or stolen, or your account is compromised, you are fully protected from liability for any fraudulent charges, thanks to Amex's zero fraud liability policy.

The Target REDcard credit card issued by TD Bank does have online account access, chip and pin technology and no liability for fraudulent charges.

If you lose your credit card, your personal liability for fraudulent charges on the credit card won't exceed $ 50, if you report it lost or stolen within 2 business days.

Your credit cards generally leave you with zero liability for fraudulent charges as long as you report the fraud.

Fraud Protection: receive notifications of unusual activity, plus zero fraud liability for fraudulent charges

Have an added layer of safety knowing that if you lose your purse or wallet you have zero liability for fraudulent charges

Not exact matches

The company said that is clients would have «zero liability» for costs incurred by fraudulent charges.

Our $ 0 Liability Guarantee, so you're not responsible for any fraudulent charges made on your account

Your liability is capped at $ 50 if you lose your credit card or it's stolen — and if you report the theft to your credit card company before any transactions occur, you won't be liable for any fraudulent charges.

Plus, you will enjoy all the security and protections you expect from a Visa card — including disputed charge resolution, zero liability for fraudulent transactions, and replacement of a lost or stolen card.

There's a $ 0 liability guarantee where you are not responsible for any fraudulent charges.

The federal Fair Credit Billing Act limits your liability for unauthorized charges to $ 50, and you're not responsible for any fraudulent purchases if you report suspected theft of your information before the card is actually used.

The good news is that Citi offers a $ 0 fraud liability to ensure that you aren't responsible for fraudulent charges on your account.

You'll get zero liability for unauthorized charges, Chip + Signature technology and mobile banking — all of which help protect you against fraudulent charges and identity theft.

2) You are protected with Zero Liability protection, which means you are not liable for fraudulent charges provided you have taken reasonable precautions to protect your PIN and your card, as set out in your RBC Royal Bank Credit Card Agreement.

Zero - Liability Protection — You won't be held responsible for fraudulent charges made with your card or account information.

Zero liability, charge disputes, and fraud alerts — You won't be liable for any fraudulent charges, any disputed charges will be frozen, and any suspected fraud will be notified to you in a manner of your choice.

Zero liability, charge disputes, and fraud alerts — You won't be liable for any fraudulent charges, any disputed charges will be frozen, and any suspected fraud will be notified to you in a manner of your choice.

287 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Uqdah Realty & Management Corp. — deposits; jurisdiction; fraudulent practices; failure to pay judgment; vicarious liability; notary public; disclosure of agency relationship; broker violated 19 NYCRR 175.1 when he deposited escrow funds into his operating account; broker committed conversion when his operating account fell below deposit amount; broker engaged in fraudulent practices when he illegally retained buyer's trust funds and attempted to qualify prospective buyer for mortgage by falsely stating their employment; broker failed to disclose his agency relationship to his client; failure to pay judgment; corporate real estate broker vicariously liable and charged with actual knowledge of violation of law because of representative broker's cognizant misconduct as corporate officer; broker is not required to deposit a refundable commission in an escrow account unless contractually demanded; corporate broker and representative broker's license revoked; restitution of deposit of $ 12,000 plus interest; notary public commission revoked based on misconduct as a real estate licensee

189 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; amendment of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit of escrow funds into operating account; preparation of lease constitutes the unauthorized practice of law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not stated in the complaint where the issue has been fully litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation of forged listing extensions violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to establish violation of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution in the amounts of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is made