Not exact matches
If
so, did you know that
in many
cases, leaving tax - deferred assets, such as IRA funds or annuities, to charity will relieve non-charitable beneficiaries of tax
liability?
Besides, the Founder incorporated specifically to avoid personal
liability in case something goes wrong,
so he has no grounds to then try to re-inject personal, non-business desires back into the company
so as to force those onto his employees.
Edie Greene, a psychologist at the University of Colorado
in Colorado Springs, instead suggests that the
case should be split into separate
liability and damages trials,
so that the jury only receives the relevant facts — a process known as bifurcation.
Limitation of
liability of the European CanCer Organisation:
in the event of it being impossible for ECCO - the European CanCer Organisation to carry out the meeting for force majeure
cases (strikes, fires, damages, or other fatal occurences),
so long as this arises from a cause not attributable to ECCO - the European CanCer Organisation, then the Organisation shall only be obliged to reimburse the payments received subject to deduction of any costs it has incurred
in preparing the event.
An additional million dollars of
liability coverage might cost you just $ 150 a year
in many
cases,
so it's well worth having.
There are comparatively few
liability scenarios that arise out of an earthquake,
so most people are worried about their personal property
in this
case.
And Florida marinas often have boat insurance requirements,
so you'll need to provide proof of
liability coverage
in case of injury or damages to others.
Liability protection doesn't work
in that direction because you're the owner of the LLC, and
so the assets of the LLC are still considered yours and their value of the LLC as a whole would be considered by creditors
in cases of bankruptcy.
In any
case, it is a good idea to estimate your tax refund or
liability using both Married filing statuses
so you know which one would be most beneficial to you.
But
in your
case, the tax
liability now might be
so large that it seriously reduces your retirement savings.
The main concern with insurance re: loans is not
liability; it's coverage of the car itself
in case it is damaged (
so the bank still has some value securing the loan).
In the
case of community cats, there are no owners,
so there is nowhere for
liability to be placed.
One of the reasons they put down
so much salt is to prevent
liability in a slip - and - fall
case,» says Ted Diers, administrator
in the Department of Environmental Services» water division.
Sutliff & Stout works
in several product
liability areas — this is a broad category,
so if you have questions about whether your
case is a product
liability case, please contact us.
Some of the factors we examine
in evaluating the merits of a defective stair
case or premises
liability are: Inadequate Stair Surfaces Stair surfaces should provide firm footing and adequate slip resistance
so as not to contribute to slipping or tripping.
The State's courts have shown no reluctance to strike punitive damage awards
in cases where punitive
liability is not established,
so that defendant qualifies for judgment on that issue as a matter of law.
In slip and fall incidents and other premises
liability cases, the evidence is often very time - sensitive,
so you should contact us today to learn what you can do to protect your right to pursue a premises
liability claim.
In deciding whether or not to bring a
case for premises
liability make sure that the defective condition of the property was known by the landowner or was
so obvious that it should have been known by him.
In the Sturmer case, a case challenging a local option by - law, the court upheld Chancellor Boyd's order for costs against non-parties who were found to have put up «a man of straw» in whose name the litigation would be carried on so as to avoid anticipated liability for costs upon dismissal of the actio
In the Sturmer
case, a
case challenging a local option by - law, the court upheld Chancellor Boyd's order for costs against non-parties who were found to have put up «a man of straw»
in whose name the litigation would be carried on so as to avoid anticipated liability for costs upon dismissal of the actio
in whose name the litigation would be carried on
so as to avoid anticipated
liability for costs upon dismissal of the action.
As an example of the former, one of the subject areas I have used for a writing assignment is landowner
liability to trespassing children.40 Even though these
cases are not within our first - semester coverage, I assign several
cases from a later part of the casebook
so the students can see how this area of law has evolved and how it works
in different jurisdictions.41 An example of reordering covered material occurs around the final writing assignment, which involves a landlord's
liability for the criminal act of a third party.
In some cases, a vehicle defect may be determined to have been a cause of a vehicle accident and / or resulting injuries, so that liability may be attached to the vehicle's manufacturer and anyone in the chain of the vehicle's distributio
In some
cases, a vehicle defect may be determined to have been a cause of a vehicle accident and / or resulting injuries,
so that
liability may be attached to the vehicle's manufacturer and anyone
in the chain of the vehicle's distributio
in the chain of the vehicle's distribution.
In every
case, we take all necessary steps to investigate and preserve evidence
so as to be armed to prove
liability if it becomes necessary to do
so, regardless of what
liability position ICBC takes initially.
The EAT asked itself two questions: firstly, does CLIA 1978 confer a right of contribution
in the
case of
liability for discrimination
in the employment field; and, if
so, did the employment tribunal have jurisdiction to determine such claims?
So if
in fact the police are investigating this
case, he wonders, what is the theory of legal
liability?
Contact an experienced premises
liability lawyer
in Los Angeles to schedule a consultation
so that you can learn more about your potential
case.
Our accomplished Atlanta drunk driving injury lawyers have the ability to prove dram shop
liability in these
cases,
so that all responsible parties are held accountable for their actions.
So in a pure uninsured motorist
case where the other driver either can not be identified (hit - and - run or phantom vehicle are the most prominent examples) or has no insurance, your own insurance company essentially steps
in the shoes of the defendant, assuming the at - fault driver's
liability for the accident but also his damages.
Cases such as this also fall under product
liability law,
so you'll want an attorney who specializes
in that practice area as well.
Establishing fault and
liability is a major factor
in the amount of compensation you can receive,
so it is a good idea to have a lawyer help you with these aspects of your
case.
While it may seem obvious to you that another party caused your injuries,
in these types of
cases it's essential to understand how
liability works
so you can prove that you are owed compensation.
In this
case the EAT held that an employee who raised compliance issues purely out of concern for her own
liability did not make a qualifying disclosure,
so was not protected as a whistleblower.
It can be difficult proving
liability in Texas
in dog bite
cases because of state dog bite legislation,
so it would be hard, if not impossible, to get a satisfactory outcome if you did not have effective legal assistance.
Section 17 (4) provided: «(4) Where the landlord has duly served a notice under subsection (2)..., the amount (exclusive of interest) which the former tenant or (as the
case may be) the guarantor is liable to pay
in respect of the fixed charge
in question shall not exceed the amount specified
in the notice unless --(a) his
liability in respect of the charge is subsequently determined to be for a greater amount, (b) the notice informed him of the possibility that that
liability would be
so determined, and (c) within the period of three months beginning with the date of the determination, the landlord serves on him a further notice informing him that the landlord intends to recover that greater amount from him (plus interest, where payable)».
provisions which immunize decision makers from
liability «are not
so uncommon or unusual
in free and democratic societies as to render them constitutionally unreasonable» (citing a number of
cases immunizing administrative tribunal members from personal
liability for their decisions);
There are
cases, however,
in which
liability is not
so clear.
We prepare a strong
case on your behalf but do our best to settle out of court
so that you won't be involved
in a long, drawn - out legal battle.Our law firm is dedicated to giving each client exceptional legal representation, and our clients truly benefit from our comprehensive knowledge of Fort Worth premises
liability law.
Even
in cases where
liability appears established and the damages are extensive, it is helpful to have witnesses who are unbiased or neutral and whose opinions and observations will be accepted by a claims adjuster or jury as reliable and credible
so that your settlement or jury award for damages is maximized.
In so - called «premises
liability»
cases involving slip and falls, the «fault» is much less obvious.
An injury attorney from our firm can help establish
liability in your
case,
so contact us today.
An experienced bicycle accident lawyer
in Los Angeles may build a strong
case that proves the
liability of the motorist
so that you may be likelier to be fairly compensated for your losses.
If you have been injured
in a wet floor accident, please fill out our online form
so one of our premises
liability attorneys can personally review your
case, free of charge.
But unfortunately the evidence is rarely
so clear cut and because of the amount of money at stake
in many fatal accident
cases the insurers are likely to fight the claim if they believe there is a chance of avoiding
liability or achieving an apportionment of
liability.
«These
cases are
so challenging to win on
liability and proving the medical part of it that sometimes we lose track of the damages, and I think the way to fix it is to get a consistent application of the principles from the trilogy
in all
cases across the country.
Another useful tool
in civil
cases is that the 5th Amendment privilege against self - incrimination does not apply,
so if the defendant refused to testify (perhaps claiming the 5th Amendment for fear of criminal consequences of truthful testimony) that refusal to testify can be used to infer that his testimony would have hurt him and to find civil
liability.
Here is a link to a useful decision from the BC Courts yesterday which confirms what we always thought was the
case: that linking to allegedly defamatory material does not constitute republication
so as to expose the linking site to
liability in defamation.
This was to be distinguished from medical negligence
cases, where it was sufficient to establish
liability either to show that the relevant person (
in most
cases, the doctor) would have taken the requisite action, or that the proper discharge of their duty would require them to do
so: see Bolitho v Hackney and City Health Authority [1998] AC 232.
Our firm believes
in providing an early and careful analysis of a professional
liability case so that we can be
in a position at the outset to give a client a fair understanding of what lies ahead.
Jurisdictional issues aside, Wright suggests the defendants» real strategy — one that has proven successful
so far — is to drag the
case on and make it more difficult for class members to participate,
in the hopes of reducing
liability for their clients.
In so holding he distinguished Perry as a case where the knowledge of the damage ie liability to pay income tax, was not obtained until later, but in reality the two cases were in unhappy conflic
In so holding he distinguished Perry as a
case where the knowledge of the damage ie
liability to pay income tax, was not obtained until later, but
in reality the two cases were in unhappy conflic
in reality the two
cases were
in unhappy conflic
in unhappy conflict.
When balanced against the prejudicial effect of allowing evidence of professional
liability insurance, the potential for bias
in this
case is
so remote as to warrant exclusion.