Sentences with phrase «liability limits required»

By law, the minimum coverage and liability limits required in Maryland are bodily injury, personal injury, and uninsured motorist liability.

As stated above, there are certain liability limits required on each Missoula automobile insurance policy.

Many people carry only the minimum liability limits required by law on their auto insurance.

You will also have to pay the liability limits required of that state.

(You should still maintain at least the minimum liability limits required by your state).

The limits of such underinsured motorist bodily injury coverage shall be equal to the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy; provided, however, that (i) the limits shall not exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident regardless of whether the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy exceed those limits, (ii) a named insured may purchase greater or lesser limits, except that the limits shall exceed the bodily injury liability limits required pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, and in no event shall an insurer be required by this subdivision to sell underinsured motorist bodily injury coverage at limits that exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident, and (iii) the limits shall be equal to the limits of uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage purchased pursuant to subdivision (3) of this subsection.

Suppose you are driving the vehicle of a friend who carries only the minimum liability limits required by the state.

The limits of such uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage shall be equal to the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy; provided, however, that (i) the limits shall not exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident regardless of whether the highest limits of bodily injury liability coverage for any one vehicle insured under the policy exceed those limits and (ii) a named insured may purchase greater or lesser limits, except that the limits shall not be less than the bodily injury liability limits required pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, and in no event shall an insurer be required by this subdivision to sell uninsured motorist bodily injury coverage at limits that exceed one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per person and one million dollars ($ 1,000,000) per accident.

Many drivers choose to operate their vehicles with the minimum liability limits required by law.

By law, the minimum coverage and liability limits required in Maryland are bodily injury, personal injury, and uninsured motorist liability.

Make sure that the liability limits held by the contractor meet the liability limits you require of your workers.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

The very act of incorporation, after all, requires a framework of public laws to enable it, as do key aspects of modern incorporation such as limited liability.

In the former case, a personal guarantee by the corporation's principals is usually required, which makes an exception to the limited liability rule.

You state that the Investment Vehicle will likely be structured as a limited liability company or limited partnership, and will be responsible for all organizational costs and expenses associated with its formation and the investment in the Portfolio Company.4 You also state that AngelList Advisors will provide the initial capital required to pay such organizational costs and expenses.

As a historical matter, the original purpose of the corporation — reflected in debates about limited liability and general incorporation statutes — was to facilitate economic growth by enabling projects that required large - scale, long - term investment.

Trusts enjoy, effectively, indefinite longevity (they have a finite existence, but it can be a good long time) and can have limited liability for benficiaries (but not for trustees) and have legal personality (in the form of the trustee) and yet we permit them to pass income through to their benefiaries to avoid tax at the trust level (so that, for example, most mutual fund trusts in Canada pay no income tax - in fact, if you look at their trust indentures, most of them are required to arrange their affairs so as not to pay tax).

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

As Chief Underwriting Counsel, Gary reviews and evaluates transaction structure and provides feedback on the insurability and necessary due diligence required to underwrite major - market commercial finance, mezzanine loan transactions and purchases of equity interests in limited liability companies and limited partnerships.

The AMT essentially places a ceiling on those benefits — if your tax benefits reduce your total tax liability below the AMT limit, you are required to pay the higher Alternative Minimum Tax amount.

All Exhibitors participating in the North Coast Wine Industry Expo Trade Show & Conference are required to carry general liability coverage from an insurance company in good standing with minimum policy limits of $ 1,000,000 per occurrence and $ 2,000,000 in all.

The state's influential Conservative Party this morning, meanwhile, released a legislative memo opposing the proposal to require up to $ 1 million in limited liability insurance for gun owners.

The Assembly voted to close the LLC loophole in campaign finance laws, cap contributions by limited liability corporations at $ 5,000 and require them to identify the individuals who make the donations in the LLC's name, and limit lawmakers» outside income to 40 percent of the annual salary of state Supreme Court justices.

He wants to create a public financing system, limit donations to housekeeping committees to $ 25,000, require bimonthly instead of semiannual disclosure, and close the «LLC loophole» that treats limited liability companies as individuals for the purpose of determining contribution limits.

Cuomo's prescriptions in his 2016 State of the State speech included closing a legal loophole that lets campaign donors funnel unlimited sums to candidates through limited - liability companies; requiring office holders to report campaign contributions every 60 days instead of twice a year; allowing lawmakers to earn no more than 15 percent of their legislative salaries in private - sector work; and adopting a system of voluntary public campaign financing similar to what New York City has.

Constrain contributions — Put the same $ 5,000 limit on contributions from limited liability corporations that exists for regular corporations, require LLCs to identify owners, and cap donations to housekeeping and party accounts.

The Assembly voted to close the LLC loophole, allowing limited liability corporations to make donations totaling $ 5,000 and requiring them to identify the individuals who make the donations in the LLC's name.

Details about the governor's proposal, due to be unveiled in next week's State of the State address, are not known, but are likely to include requiring more disclosure and regulations regarding outside income, and another promise to push to seal the so - called L.L.C. loophole, which allows limited liability companies almost unchecked ability to donate money to candidates.

Each of Cuomo's proposals requires limited liability companies be treated as traditional corporations, which would cap contributions at $ 5,000, according to the administration's release.

Both Cuomo's executive budget proposal and the Assembly's one - house resolution recommend that LLCs be subject to the same campaign contribution limitations as other corporations and require that the owners of each limited liability company be disclosed, but the Senate GOP's resolution makes no mention of the legislation.

PLEASE READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS SERVICE, AS THEY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WAIVERS OF RIGHTS, LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, AND YOUR INDEMNITY TO US, AND THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRES THE USE OF ARBITRATION ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN COURTS OR JURY TRIALS, AND LIMITS THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.

The procedure for employment must include, but is not limited to, the filing of a complete set of fingerprints as required in s. 1012.32; documentation of a minimum education level of a high school diploma or equivalent; and completion of an initial orientation and training program in district policies and procedures addressing school safety and security procedures, educational liability laws, professional responsibilities, and ethics.

No, as an employer, you must not require an employee to sign a consent, release, waiver of liability, or indemnification agreement with respect to any part of the drug or alcohol testing process covered by this part (including, but not limited to, collections, laboratory testing, MRO and SAP services).

If it requires significant treatment, exceed the limits of medical payments to others coverage, or may not have been your fault or responsibility, then the liability portion of your Columbus renters insurance can kick in to

You can reduce your liability limits to whatever minimum your auto and / or home insurer requires.

With rising health care costs and the extensive technology used in motor vehicles today, state - required liability limits may not be sufficient.

North Carolina requires minimum limits of $ 30,000 per person and up to $ 60,000 per accident for Bodily Injury Liability, and Uninsured Motorist Coverage.

Connecticut requires that every driver carry minimum liability limits of $ 20,000 per person and $ 40,000 per accident in bodily injury coverage and $ 10,000 property damage coverage.

At the least, you're required by law to buy a 20/40/10 policy: minimum bodily injury liability limits of $ 20,000 per injured person, up to a total of $ 40,000 per accident, and property damage liability coverage of $ 10,000.

California requires that car insurance policies have at least bodily injury liability and property damage liability coverages of the limits below:

In order to win, the selected Customer must first correctly answer, unaided, a time - limited, mathematical, skill - testing question to be administered by letter via email, and he or she will be required to sign a standard Declaration and Release Form confirming compliance with the Raffle Rules, acceptance of the Prize as awarded and releasing BBS Securities Inc. / Virtual Brokers from all liability relating to the Raffle.

As an example, the state of Colorado requires drivers to carry liability limits of 25/50/15, which translates into $ 25,000 per person, $ 50,000 for the entire accident, and $ 15,000 for property damage.

Nevada requires that all drivers maintain liability limits of at least $ 15,000 per person, $ 30,000 per accident for bodily injury and $ 10,000 property damage.

Nevada state law requires vehicle owners to purchase policies with these minimum liability limits.

Wyoming's automobile financial responsibility law requires minimum liability limits of $ 25,000 per person, $ 50,000 per accident bodily injury and $ 20,000 property damage.

When you're comparing Citrus Heights insurance quotes for your vehicle, check to see if the policies the companies are offering provide the basic liability coverage required by California law or standard coverage, which includes higher liability limits plus comprehensive, collision, insured and uninsured motorist coverages.

Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we are not responsible and will not incur liability to you for any failure, error, malfunction or any delay in carrying out obligations under this Collateral Account Agreement if such failure, error or delay results from causes that are beyond our reasonable control (including, but not limited to inclement weather, fire, flood, acts of war or terrorism, and earthquakes).

Two Senate committees separately approved bills that would strengthen the government's regulation of offshore drilling, require oil companies to be better prepared to cope with a spill, and lift federal spill - related economic liability limits.

«Current legislation and practice in France does not require the owner or op - erators of nuclear power plants to cover the entire risk of severe accident, but limits their liability.

Limited liability companies in Georgia are required to keep the following records in their principal office: