Sentences with phrase «liability litigation involving»

Our team of over 50 lawyers has been involved in some of the most significant complex tort litigations of the last 30 years, including product liability litigation involving Zoloft ® and Lipitor ®, and we are at the forefront of the opioid litigations.

The Bryan Cave Product Liability team has substantial experience representing companies from a wide array of industries in product liability litigation involving wrongful death, personal injury and commercial disputes.

Brody, Hardoon, Perkins & Kesten, LLP has been defending product manufacturers, Distributors, and direct sellers in complex product liability litigation involving loss of life and property, serious personal injury and loss of business.

Won dismissal for American Regent / Luitpold Pharmaceuticals in product liability litigation involving allegedly defective pharmaceutical products.

Jonathan's practice is focused on mass tort product liability litigation involving defective medical devices and pharmaceutical drugs.

Expert development and MDL coordinating counsel for global pharmaceutical company in product liability litigation involving medication to treat gastrointestinal conditions

Serving as a member of a trial team that obtained a defense verdict in class action products liability litigation involving home heating oil.

Not exact matches

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections cases and appeals; representing media groups in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing parties in multi-national litigation.

Her entire career has been focused on these particular areas of law, having handled countless high - end cases involving nursing home litigation, medical malpractice, wrongful death, motor vehicle accidents, traumatic brain injuries, slip / trip & falls, premises liability, sexual assault, and other types of personal injury.

He has frequently presented and coordinated programs in the field of trial advocacy for his peers, comprised of courses involving premises liability, breast cancer litigation, trial strategy, deposition strategy and the MCARE Act.

Mr. Boyajian helps clients involved in all manner of business disputes, including litigation of professional liability matters, business torts, breach of contract claims, and shareholder disputes.

He has also defended clients in complex civil litigation involving premises liability, employment disputes, habitability, and intellectual property claims.

Prior to joining the firm, Cari represented national companies in litigation for claims involving healthcare, personal injury, contract disputes, and product liability matters.

Bob is a tireless and zealous advocate for each of his clients, whether the matter is bet - the - company litigation or a lawsuit involving more moderate liability exposure.

Jodi Mullis is a partner in WSHB's Phoenix office, handling complex litigation involving medical malpractice, elder care, product liability, professional malpractice, wrongful death and construction defect matters.

Mr. Kohler's legal experience is comprised of both transactional and litigation services, and includes cases involving trademark prosecution and infringement, software licensing agreements, contract drafting and enforcement, copyright infringement and fair use, website liability, business entity formation, private securities offerings, partnership disputes and more.

Prior to joining Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, Ms. Molloy has handled a broad range of complex business and commercial litigation involving contract disputes, bankruptcy matters, as well as products liability.

He has litigated, arbitrated and mediated cases involving banking (workouts, foreclosures, «lender liability,» and other aspects of loan enforcement and collection), real estate (developer disputes, landlord / tenant litigation, broker commission disputes, boundary disputes and adverse possession), partnerships and family - owned businesses (issues involving company control, buyouts and valuation), real estate finance (default resolution, servicing and lien priority, trust disputes and guardianships), intellectual property (prosecution and defense of cases involving trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and patents) and other matters involving various contract and business tort claims.

Our litigation and trial lawyers are experienced with the common and statutory laws involving the prospective liability of manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of products to purchasers, users, and bystanders for personal injury and property damage caused by alleged defects in those products.

Kevin has enjoyed a diverse practice in all areas of personal injury litigation including legal malpractice, accounting malpractice, products liability, motor vehicle accidents involving both commercial and private passenger vehicles, wrongful death, unfair trade practice matters, and premises liability.

Eric C. McNamar is an attorney in Lewis Wagner's Litigation Group where he spends the majority of his time handling catastrophic and complex litigation, insurance coverage disputes and general litigation matters involving transportation, construction and premise Litigation Group where he spends the majority of his time handling catastrophic and complex litigation, insurance coverage disputes and general litigation matters involving transportation, construction and premise litigation, insurance coverage disputes and general litigation matters involving transportation, construction and premise litigation matters involving transportation, construction and premise liability.

Neal's business litigation experience has included the successful trial and arbitration of cases involving a broad spectrum of issues, including but not limited to the Uniform Commercial Code, «lender liability» law, fraudulent conveyance avoidance, preference avoidance, partnership disputes, state and federal securities law issues, business torts, and contract law.

In a complex products liability action involving alleged PCB contamination of a state office building, the Appellate Practice Group joined forces with litigation counsel to convert a $ 60 million judgment to a defense verdict for a large, multinational company.

In Ontario, the courts look to the common law for direction in determining liability in litigation involving motor vehicle accidents.

During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.

Prior to joining Conroy Simberg, Melissa represented plaintiffs in personal injury claims managing litigation involving premises liability, medical malpractice, nursing home negligence, and wrongful death actions from inception through trial.

Representation of national construction equipment company in a multi-million dollar asbestos litigation involving successor liability and product identification issues.

Michael Muse - Fisher represents public and private companies in a variety of state, federal and administrative cases involving contract disputes, commercial litigation, licensing and intellectual property matters, eminent domain / inverse condemnation, government tort liability, breach of fiduciary duty, as well as land - related torts.

It catalogs decisions ruling on issues of corporate, limited liability company and partnership law, as well as transactions and litigation issues involving those entities, their governance and investments in them.

Retail law involves a complex intersection of many areas of law, including employment law, real estate law, ADA & EEOC practices, retail practice, premises liability litigation and commercial litigation.

The Charleston product liability attorneys serve the needs of individuals and businesses in litigation involving personal injury and property damage claims resulting from many different types of product liability.

Our attorneys assist our clients in all phases of public and private construction contracting and dispute resolution, including: licensing; compliance; bid protests; contract drafting, negotiation and enforcement; claims notice and preservation; and litigation and arbitration claims involving defective design and construction, delay and interference, lien and bond claims, insurance coverage disputes and product liability claims.

As an experienced trial lawyer, Susie has successfully defended employers, management and corporations involving commercial disputes, general civil litigation, premises liability, personal injury law and class and derivative actions.

Jack has over twenty years of experience in numerous types of commercial litigation matters, with substantial representations of clients in many matters involving environmental litigation, including five trials pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, significant architectural, engineering and construction disputes, business acquisition and transactional disputes, including takeover / merger and acquisition litigation, claims under purchase and sales and indemnity contracts, securities law litigation, insurance coverage on behalf of the insured, and legal issues relating to medical records release and copying.

Brian Brown manages, supervises and handles the defense litigation cases involving automobile negligence, products liability, premises liability including lead - based paint poisoning, civil assaults, construction accidents, insurance coverage, insurance fraud and claims of negligent security, including ATMs.

His practice focuses on complex personal injury and product liability claims involving defective auto and consumer products as well as nursing home abuse litigation.

Construction disputes are among the most complex, high - stakes commercial litigation matters, potentially involving millions of dollars in liability as well as damage to valued reputations and relationships.

A Fellow in the International Academy of Trial Lawyers and a frequent lecturer to bar associations and trial lawyer groups nationwide, Kent devotes 100 percent of his practice to litigation in product liability, motor vehicle accidents, and other cases involving personal injury and wrongful death.

Our product liability attorneys are actively involved in litigation involving the design and manufacturing of motor vehicles, airplanes, trains, glass bottles, tires, all terrain vehicles, motorcycles, pharmaceutical products, medical devices, machinery, construction equipment, boats, scuba diving equipment, farm equipment, electrical components, toys and various other consumer products.

We focus on building key relationships with law firms and managing legal affairs as best we can and the type of legal work that Navistar Canada is involved in doesn't really warrant a large department because it's defendant - side litigation on the product liability side and some corporate - driven transactions, be it tax or finance, that are not routine.

Defense of leading U.S. pharmaceutical and biologic manufacturers in national and international product liability and commercial litigation involving prescription biologics, nonsteroidal pain medications, diet drugs, statins and other medications, including class actions, multi-district litigations, Congressional investigations, criminal proceedings, and shareholder derivative litigation

His practice focuses largely on the litigation of complex disputes involving common law, statutory law, contract law, physician and hospital liability law, products liability law, commercial, corporate and business issues, catastrophic personal injury cases and class action / mass torts / pharmaceutical litigation.

Recourse to a civil lawyer occurs in all sorts of situations of civil litigation: this litigation may concern failure to respect a contract, damages involving third party liability, neighbourhood trouble, damages caused by actions performed in bad faith or the incompetence of a person, personal injury, etc..

Kate's practice focuses on insurance defence litigation involving various types of matters including personal injury and insurance claims, as well as municipal, motor vehicle, occupier's and hospital liability claims.

Luzarraga is also a first chair trial lawyer in product liability and personal injury cases involving automotive companies, consumer product manufacturers, trace benzene and asbestos litigation as well as commercial litigation involving contract disputes, consumer claims, and professional liability.

This panel will explore the evolving practices of the plaintiff's bar and emerging litigation trends, including wage and hour suits, patent trolls, theories of liability involving no real injury; and government enforcement of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act.

He defends numerous corporate and commercial clients in state and federal courts involving commercial litigation and casualty defense litigation, including catastrophic trucking accidents, construction accidents, products liability, environmental matters and premises liability.

Mr. Sistrunk's practice focuses largely on the litigation of complex disputes involving common law, statutory law, contract law, physician and hospital liability law, product liability law, commercial, corporate and business issues, catastrophic personal injury cases and class action / mass torts / pharmaceutical litigation.

The Worcester law firm of Peter Ventura concentrates exclusively on personal injury and wrongful death claims and litigation, with a special emphasis on cases that present complex issues regarding proof of liability or the severity of the injuries involved.