California holds to a strict
liability statute when it comes to dog attacks.
Not exact matches
The
statute provides immunity from
liability for civil damages for volunteers assisting with extracurricular activities, except
when the act or omission is willfully or wantonly negligent.
«1) If
when determining the
liability of a person to taxation, duty or similar charge due under
statute in the UK it shall be established that a step or steps have been included in a transaction giving rise to that
liability or to any claim for an allowance, deduction or relief, with such steps having been included for the sole or one of the main purposes of securing a reduction in that
liability to taxation, duty or similar charge with no other material economic purpose for the inclusion of such a step being capable of demonstration by the taxpayer, then subject to the sole exception that the step or steps in question are specifically permitted under the term of any legislation promoted for the specific purpose of permitting such use, such step or steps shall be ignored
when calculating the resulting
liability to taxation, duty or similar charge.
(In fact,
when it comes to protecting student data, Connecticut actually has a
statute that provides for immunity of
liability for data breach and NO notice to parents that a breach has occurred.)
«A defendant's conduct can not be deemed «unreasonable»
when that conduct has been expressly sanctioned by
statute, for it is well established that, even where «it would be a nuisance at common law, conduct that is fully authorized by statue, ordinance or administrative regulation does not subject the actor to tort
liability.
There are also some states that have
statutes of repose that exclude
liability claims
when a product has reached a certain age.
California has what is known as a «strict
liability statute»
when it comes to dog attacks.
South Carolina has a «strict
liability statute»
when it comes to dog bite cases.
In product
liability, there also is a
statute of repose that affects
when a lawsuit must be filed.
This
statute holds true regardless of whether or not a dog owner has prior knowledge of the dog's aggressiveness, which makes Florida a strict
liability state
when it comes to dog bites.
'' [P] unitive damages are not recoverable
when liability is premised solely on the employer's violation of the Labor Code
statutes that regulate meal and rest breaks, pay stubs, and minimum wage laws.»
First, it authorizes «medium - form mergers» (allowing an entity to accept a tender offer for merger and proceed without submitting the merger vote to the owners in certain circumstances), while clarifying the path toward completing conversions (for example,
when a Minnesota corporation converts into a Minnesota limited
liability company) and domestications (when an entity formed in another state opts to be governed by Minnesota business statutes, such as the Minnesota Business Corporations Act or Minnesota Revised Limited Liability Comp
liability company) and domestications (
when an entity formed in another state opts to be governed by Minnesota business
statutes, such as the Minnesota Business Corporations Act or Minnesota Revised Limited
Liability Comp
Liability Company Act.)
In a post-trial motion, the truck's owner sought to reduce his own
liability based on a state
statute that limits a vehicle owner's
liability to $ 100,000
when the only basis of
liability is that he loaned the vehicle to another person who negligently caused an accident.