Work highlights Appeared in the Supreme Court for Life Technologies to reverse a Federal Circuit decision in a patent infringement case, successfully arguing that the supply of a single component of a multicomponent patented invention for manufacture abroad does not give rise to
liability under the Patent Act.
Not exact matches
Incentives should include exemption of microbusinesses (
under 20 employees, and
under $ 2 million annual revenue) from the more onerous reporting, environmental
liability, minority quotas, employee
liabilities, OSHA hassles, and taxation (including
patent «maintenance fees»), imposed by the federal government.
The amicus brief argues that the notion that an infringer's entire profit (on an infringing article) should be recoverable goes back to the 19th century, when only knowing infringement resulted in
liability, while «even independent designers are [
under today's strict
liability regime] on the hook for
patent infringement in modern design
patent law».
Since joining JAMS, Judge Roberts has been appointed as a discovery master by federal and state courts to supervise discovery and review privileged documents in complex commercial,
patent, and product
liability cases, as an election monitor for unions
under court supervision, as a consultant to monitor a four - year consent decree in an EEOC pattern and practice case against a major restaurant chain, and as a trustee for a 36 - story commercial retail and office building on Fifth Avenue