Sentences with phrase «liable as»

However, the original owner remains liable as well.

Marketplace Realty v. Robinson (277 A.D. 2d 431)- summary judgment for broker affirmed; broker establishes its entitlement to commission as lower court properly concludes that defendants were liable as agents for an undisclosed or unidentified principal

An Illinois federal court has considered whether a website which allowed users to post information about housing on the website could be liable as a publisher for postings which allegedly contained content that violated prohibitions contained in the federal Fair Housing Act («FHA»).

We indicated that while the personal assistant was under the control and supervision of the principal salesperson, all licensable activity is performed as a salesperson of the company and is liable as such.

On appeal the court found the sellers liable and the sales representative liable as well.

The law is absolutely clear that if a vendor, independent contractor, or temporary worker harms a member of the public or a co-worker, the employer can be just as liable as if the person were on the employer's full - time payroll.

Employees and investors of ICO companies could be held criminally liable as well.

Whoever, without authority, supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States a design for a product embodying a patented invention in such manner as to actively induce the making of that product outside the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if made in the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.

In the event of damages, the parent who co-signed is just as liable as the student.

The insurance covers losses to the insured's property and losses for which the insured is liable as a result of owning or operating a car.

The second is to be found liable as part of the lawsuit.

A court can find you liable as well, and in both cases the policy could pay.

The insurance covers losses to the insured's property and losses for which the insured is liable as a result of owning or operating an auto.

Liability coverage will pay up to the policy limits for medical injuries and property damage for which the policyholder is liable as a result of an accident.

When you are the owner of property you are liable as the home owner for any claim of nuisance or negligence made out against you.

If there is property damage or personal injury that exceeds your coverage, you can be held liable as well.

Liability coverage typically provides financial protection in case you are liable as a result of a covered accident.

Collaboration in Primary Health Care: «Will Physicians be Liable as Captains of the Ship?»

He ruled that Google Inc. could be held liable as a publisher because it operates an Internet search engine, an automated system, precisely as intended and has the ability to block identified web pages.

As a result, Justice McCallum concluded that it was clear that Google Inc. was not liable as a publisher, and ordered the proceedings to be permanently stayed.

Daniel Barnett, employment law barrister at 1 Temple Gardens, says: «It remains good practice for employers to carry out a full risk assessment; not doing so might not be discriminatory in its own right, but it runs the risk the employer might miss a reasonable adjustment and be liable as a result.»

She ruled that there was no human input in the application of Google's search engine apart from the creation of the algorithm, and thus that Google could not be held liable as a publisher for results hat appeared prior to notification of a complaint.

If either dies during such constraint, as a result of a failure of care by their «management» then that management should be equally liable as the owner of a factory who allows a driver of a forklift truck to plunge over a faulty railing — more so, perhaps, as the factory analogy supposes that the driver is there by choice and could, hypothetically, leave at any time.

The real issue was whether the receivers were liable as claimed in damages for the value of the company's contractual claims assessed as at the date of their invalid appointment.

Inducing breach of contract is a tort in which the defendant becomes liable as an accessory to the breach of contract of another.

VTB argued that the court should pierce RAP's corporate veil to show that the defendants were all liable as parties under the loan documents.

And the jury awarded Boucher damages of $ 250,000 against Pinnock, made up of $ 100,000 for intentional infliction of mental suffering, and $ 150,000 in punitive damages (awards for which Wal - Mart is vicariously liable as Pinnock's employer).

The person with a mental health condition is as liable as the person without all else being equal.

Personal Injury — Premises Liability — Slip & Fall Accidents In Rhode Island by A RI Lawyer - Attorney In Rhode Island, Premises liability is the area of Personal Injury law, which attempts to hold a real estate owner or the person in possession of real estate liable as a result of an accident causing injuries to a person who was using the property.

On May 31, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified the level of knowledge required to establish inducement of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (b), which provides that «[w] hoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer.»

Regardless of the seriousness of the injuries or intoxication level of a drunk driver, the individual or group hosting the party can be held liable as a co-defendant.

Many times, an injured individual will be able to bring a lawsuit against the driver of the truck, and in certain instances the truck driver's employer may be liable as well.

Furthermore, he promoted the scheme, and according to 35 U.S. Code § 271 (b), «Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer.»

Even if the general partner has done nothing wrong, he or she could also be held liable as an individual in some cases.

There is a strong argument, on established principles, that Google will be liable as a publisher of its business reviews where it has received notification of the false and defamatory reviews and has failed to remove them within a reasonable amount of time (see Pritchard v. Van Nes 2016 BCSC 686).

The Supreme Court of South Australia, in Google Inc. v. Duffy [2017] SASCFC 130, recently held that once Google received notification of false and defamatory statements, it was liable as a secondary publisher.

However, the sting in the tail was that the settlement in no way covered all of her costs, for which she was liable as she had won the case.

But if it were to be, we could end up in a nonsensical situation whereby systems integrators and outsourcers could be liable as «sellers» for software that they obtained from third party licensors, while such third party licensors would at the same time continue not to be liable as «sellers», but only as licensors in accordance with their license agreement with the service provider or the customer.

Services that link to infringing material are not liable as long as they did not know the material was infringing and they respond to a takedown notice by removing the links or blocking access to the material.

But Howard Rice points out that if it's not just individuals who face liability; companies may be liable as well if an employee circulates defamatory content on a corporate blog or Twitter account.

Google Inc's submission on this issue must be rejected for a number of reasons, the least of which is that it understates the ways in which a person may be held liable as a publisher.

The defendant can be held liable as a result of either the actions that are taken, or actions that are not taken.

It won an important decision before Justice Eady of the English High Court in which the court held that Google was not liable as a publisher of defamatory comments when comments made in an internet forum about Metropolitan International Schools, a British company that operates Internet - based training courses, surfaced in the top rankings of a Google search for the company.

One is liable as an accomplice to the crime of another if he or she gave assistance or encouragement or failed to perform a legal duty to prevent it with the intent thereby to promote or facilitate commission of the crime.

Mr. Baig argued that the motions judge had erred in finding him personally liable as he was protected by the corporate veil.14

In most cases, injuries suffered from another animal are handled the same way when it comes to holding a party liable as dog bites.

On appeal, we argued, and the Superior Court agreed, that the alleged evidence of the utility company's control by contract and conduct (e.g., the presence of a contract field representative on site, internal safety guidelines, controlling access to the pole when lines were energized, the provision of certain ladders for access to the pole) was insufficient as a matter of law to constitute control over the means and methods of the subcontractor's work, and thus, the utility was not liable as a landowner out of possession.

For instance, if the driver who caused a car crash that led to your injuries was working at the time of the crash, his or her employer may be financially liable as well.

The defendant can be held liable as a result of either the actions that are taken, or the actions that are not taken.

Each party is still as equally liable as when the account was opened, even if the divorce court mandated that Spouse A pay the bill.