Sentences with phrase «liable for actions»

In that group, two main concerns were identified: that real estate professionals and others not be held liable for actions if they had no reasonable way of knowing that a disparate impact would be the outcome, and that real estate professionals not be expected to do extensive research into the possible disparate impact of their actions.
Thus, the court ruled that individual corporate officers like the Broker could be personally liable for the actions of the corporation's employees.
Since the Broker had the responsibility to supervise the Brokerage's salespeople in his role as designated officer / broker, the court ruled that he could be personally liable for the actions of Crank.
A Seattle judge is weighing whether Zillow should be held liable for the actions of two executives accused of destroying evidence in an alleged plot to steal trade secrets from Move, Inc..
The court also considered whether the Broker was individually liable for the actions of Crank because the parties were in an agency relationship.
A California appellate court has considered whether a corporation's designated broker could be personally liable for the actions taken by one of the corporation's salespeople, absent a showing of special circumstances.
Since Brusha acted with New West's apparent authority, and could be considered its agent, New West can be vicariously liable for his actions.
The court also considered whether an individual owner could be personally liable for the actions of the leasing agent.
On remand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the Broker could be personally liable for the actions of Crank and sent the case back to the trial court for further proceedings.
Under the general principles of corporate law, a corporation is liable for the actions of its employees.
The Court determined that the Act did not vary the traditional rules of vicarious liability (or, when an owner can be liable for the actions of its employees) and so directed the appellate court to consider the allegations against the Broker under the traditional principles of vicarious liability.
Due to the agency relationship between the parties, the Broker could be individually liable for the actions of Crank.
The Supreme Court of Ohio has considered whether a broker could be liable for the actions of a salesperson simply because the broker received a commission from a transaction involving the salesperson.
The trial court had instructed the jury that if the Salesperson had committed fraud, then the Brokerage was vicariously liable for the actions of the Salesperson.
Finally the court considered the argument made by Wilf that he could not be liable for the actions of the Leasing Agent, arguing that he had nothing to do with the day - to - day activities of the Leasing Agent.
Wilf also moved for judgment, arguing that he could not be personally liable for the actions of the Leasing Agent.
The attorney told them that because Frank was their agent, they might be liable for his actions.
Florida appellate court finds that fact issues remained as to whether the broker ratified the salesperson's conduct and made the brokerage vicariously liable for his actions.
As long as a service makes a good - faith effort to take down infringing content when they're informed of it, they're not liable for the actions of their users and everyone involved can skip a long, expensive court process.
Their CEO, Carl Ferrer, was arrested in late 2016 and charged with pimping a minor, but the case was dropped by a judge who ruled that he couldn't be held liable for the actions of a third party.
In the LLP structure, there must be a managing partner that is liable for the actions of the partnership.
We do not control and are not liable for the actions of any third parties who we may promote.
Your business may be held liable for the actions of intoxicated customers.
If you have any problems with a third party service or company you found on this site please let us know and we can address it with them but we are not in any way responsible nor to be held liable for their actions.
Most insurance companies will not accept liability for deliberate actions on the part of the policy holder that increase the level of risk of them being held liable for their actions.
These individuals, whether paid or working as a volunteer, are held liable for actions of a fiduciary nature.
The wrongdoers can be held both civilly and criminally liable for their actions.
It could be anything from a commercial dispute over contracts or disputes between owners, or perhaps a business could find itself sued and be liable for actions that are said to cause harm to others.
The insurer is vicariously liable for the actions of its employee.
The girl won her claim on the basis that her local authority was vicariously liable for the actions of the playground supervisor who had noted some jostling on the slide and told the children to use it one at a time.
The owner is not vicariously liable for the actions of any third party to whom that person might then give the vehicle.
However, bullying at work can occur at any time and from any person, making the business potentially liable for the actions of its employees even if the employer is innocent of any wrongdoing.
The court considered and ruled on: whether aggravated damages, which are purely compensatory, are appropriate where there has already been an award for psychological damage; whether exemplary damages should be awarded; and whether chief constables are vicariously liable for the actions of their officers.
This means that if a dog attacks another person, the dog owner will be strictly liable for the actions of their dog.
In other cases, plaintiffs have successfully argued that HMOs and other institutional defendants are vicariously liable for the actions of physicians under theories of respondeat superior and apparent authority.
In other instances, physicians who prescribe drugs with severe interactions or in wrong dosages may be held liable for their actions.
(a) Is the Defendant vicariously liable for the actions of those persons who perpetrated the abuse?
Would the parents still be liable if their child was over 21 or when are parents no longer liable for the actions of their children?
With an experienced, tenacious lawyer from this firm putting pressure on the insurer and building a strong case on your behalf, the attorney can effectively assist you in recovering financial compensation that will help you reach toward a brighter, more secure future while holding the responsible party liable for their actions.
Even if a hotel employee injures a guest, the hotel can still be held liable for the actions of its employee.
Finally, the Doe family alleged that the hospital was vicariously liable for the actions of the nurse and the doctor.
The attorneys at Altman & Altman will find out how your accident happened, see who is responsible, sometimes more than one party is responsible for truck accident claims, and make sure that the negligent party or parties are held liable for their actions.
The City of Chicago has stated publicly that red light cameras are designed to hold negligent drivers liable for their actions while decreasing the number of collisions that happen elsewhere when motorists choose to ignore red lights.
California employers are deemed to be liable for the actions of their employees when the employees negligently cause injuries to others while they are working.
In addition, Bluewaters claims damages against BLB on the basis that they are liable for the actions of Dr Gribkowsky.
In short, the business is vicariously liable for the actions of these individuals, though perhaps arguable as far as the actions of a rogue employee / director / partner acting upon their own criminal accord are concerned.
The plaintiff also alleged that the law firm with which the lawyer shared work space was vicariously liable for her actions.
The case involves the issue of whether or not an employer may be liable for the actions of its employees when the employees are following set store policies.
Racist Facebook comment about co-worker: Employees can be liable for actions outside the office
(2) Public institutions, such as state - owned hospitals, will not be held criminally liable for actions taken in the exercise of their public domain role / function, but can be criminally liable for offences committed while acting outside such public functions.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z