Sentences with phrase «liable for malpractice»

This allows the other partners to avoid being held liable for malpractice of another partner.

Doctors and other medical professionals can be held liable for a malpractice claim for multiple instances of deviating from the accepted standard of care during pregnancy or birth.

For example, lawyers will be held liable for malpractice due to non - or mis - use of available technologies such as computer - aided legal research.

The Plaintiffs should all be ashamed and it is the Vandals opinion that they are liable for malpractice damages by ruining their client's reputation in a frivolous attempt to act like Godzilla when it comes to hoarding their precious font and inhibiting protected free speech.

If a firm achieves a poor result due to competing shareholders» interests, will it be liable for malpractice?

In another case, the court suggested that counsel should be liable for malpractice for a brief that was egregiously noncompliant with court rules.

While chiropractors are not doctors, they are medical professionals that could be liable for malpractice.

In a medical malpractice case, this may mean that an individual healthcare practitioner is not liable for the malpractice; instead, their employer, such as a hospital, may be held liable instead.

As a result, a hospital that caused a patient harm by failing to do this would likely be liable for malpractice.

For example, if a doctor administers a drug to a patient, to which the patient is known to be allergic (i.e., it is listed in the patient's chart), the doctor will likely be liable for malpractice if the drug ends up causing injuries to the patient.

In such a case, the podiatrist would likely be liable for malpractice because a reasonably prudent podiatrist would have diagnosed the foot wound or ulcer, properly understanding the potentially dire consequences associated with such a condition.

When a medical professional causes injuries or death by failing to adhere to the standard of care, that medical professional will likely be liable for malpractice.

The entire ADA could easily be held liable for malpractice.

Not exact matches

Torts — Negligence — Medical malpractice — Causation — Trial judge finding respondent obstetrician liable for applicant infant's injuries — Whether, under principles described in Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, it is open for a trier of fact to find causation by drawing an inference based on all the evidence led at trial, notwithstanding the fact that the defence has led some evidence to the contrary — Whether, in an informed consent case, the causation issue is decided in accordance with the majority or the minority opinions of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar, [2005] 1 A.C. 134.

Sometimes a health care provider also may be liable for medical malpractice for failing to adequately investigate potential side effects and discuss them with a patient before prescribing a medication.

When podiatrists fail to follow professional standards of care, they may be liable for medical malpractice.

When doctors and healthcare providers fail to do this, and injury or wrongful death occurs, they may be held liable for damages under Connecticut medical malpractice laws.

If the limited liability partner (s) committed wrongful or tortious acts, they may be held liable with the result of them being sued for malpractice.

If a physician, nurse, therapist or other medical provider deviates from the expected, recognized standard of care and injures someone as a result, they could be held liable for medical malpractice.

In the case of medical malpractice suits, hospitals may be held liable for negligence or for the negligence of their employees.

Main N.J. Lawyers Still Liable for Medical Malpractice Premiums»

The responsible doctor, nurse or other healthcare provider can be held liable through a medical malpractice claim for such medication errors.

New Mexico Again Ranks Number One in Per Capita Accidental Deaths, New Mexico Personal Injury Lawyer Blog, December 23, 2012 Study Finds State of New Mexico May be Liable for $ 120 Million in Albuquerque Medical Malpractice Case, New Mexico Personal Injury Lawyer Blog, December 16, 2012 Additional Resources:

Additionally, a hospital may be liable for medical malpractice damages if the hospital's policies resulted in the medical malpractice injury.

It is easier for medical mistakes to happen in this type of environment than in other medical settings; however, emergency room doctors and nurses may still be liable for medical malpractice if they fail to provide the same standard of care that a reasonable doctor or nurse would've provided under similar circumstances.

Medical malpractice law holds dentists and other health care providers liable for any harm caused by their negligence.

This could lead to your doctor being found liable for medical malpractice.

Both insurance agents and insurance brokers can be held liable under tort and contract theories for their malpractice.

We then bring medical malpractice suits that hold every liable party — including the device manufacturer, the hospital and the physicians who operated on you — responsible for your injuries.

At the law offices of Cohen, Placitella & Roth, P.C., our experienced medical malpractice and drug liability attorneys are here to help you understand your options, and how to hold a drug company liable for harm.

NJ Hospitals Liable for Docs» Lack of Insurance Early this fall, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that, when doctors do not carry proper medical malpractice insurance, patients who suffer personal injury at their hands are entitled to sue the hospitals that employ them.

The person held liable for the medical malpractice could be the physician, the health care provider, the hospital, or federal agencies that run hospital facilities.

When those defects or injuries are the result of poor medical care, the attending physician may be held liable for medical malpractice.

The first theory is direct negligence, namely that the HMO is liable for negligent hiring, supervision or retention of a doctor accused of malpractice.

In order to hold your physician liable for medical malpractice, you must prove that a doctor / patient relationship existed, that a duty to you existed, that a deviation from medical protocol occurred and that your injury was caused by the physician.

«N.J. Lawyers Still Liable for Medical Malpractice Premiums Main Good Old - Fashioned Columns Can Generate Clients Also»

LLPs provide personal liability protection to the general partners, but the partners are still liable for their own malpractice.

The physician may, thus, be found liable in a medical malpractice action for a brachial plexus palsy injury sustained by the child during the child's vaginal delivery.

When the professional specialty standard of care is not met, medical malpractice law provides recourse for victims by enabling them to hold negligent parties liable for their injuries.

If an obstetrician or other medical personnel who are assisting in the birth of a child negligently fail to recognize and adequately manage these and other complications, the obstetrician and assisting medical professionals may be found liable in a medical malpractice action for a child's CP that is determined to have been caused by the negligence of such medical personnel.

When physicians fail to meet the appropriate standard of care, causing injury to his or her patient, the physician may be held liable for committing medical malpractice.

Government medical agencies can be held liable for medical malpractice under certain conditions.

Nurses, lab technicians, and other medical professionals who are responsible for your wellbeing might also be held liable in a medical malpractice case.

Plaintiff alleged that the client and the co-defendant were liable for false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, assumption of duty, civil conspiracy under 42 USC § 1983, medical malpractice, and negligence per se as the result of the plaintiff's arrest for prescription fraud.

If, for instance, a baby exhibits signs of breathing difficulties, pale skin, or loss of consciousness immediately following birth and the failure of medical personnel to timely and appropriately respond to the baby's condition is found to have resulted in an asphyxia injury to the baby, such medical personnel may be found liable for the baby's injury in a medical malpractice action.

When this happens, if the pain management doctor, pain management clinic, or pharmacy was not properly managing and controlling the use of the narcotic, they may be liable for the death and a lawsuit may be pursued under Utah law for medical malpractice or negligence.

If, for example, an obstetrician fails to timely order or perform a C - section when nuchal cord is detected and this failure is found to have been a cause of the baby's HIE childbirth injury, the obstetrician may be found liable for the damages suffered by the child as a result of the injury in an action for medical malpractice.

When this occurs, the obstetrician or medical professional responsible may be found liable for the damages suffered by a child as a result of the HIE injury in an action for medical malpractice.

If an obstetrician or other medical professional assisting or involved in a pregnant woman's care negligently fails to detect such signs of fetal asphyxia during the mother's pregnancy or the labor and delivery stages of childbirth, or to appropriately and timely respond to such signs, the obstetrician or other medical personnel may be found liable for the child's resulting HIE injuries in a medical malpractice action.

If a doctor fails to diagnose or properly manage preeclampsia, and injury results, he or she may be liable for medical malpractice.