In these cases, there might be more than one
liable party because there are so many places where the part or service could have gone wrong.
Not exact matches
The letter keeps open the possibility of holding senior
party figures personally
liable,
because the Liberal Democrat
party is an unincorporated association, which means it does not possess «legal personality».
We have been with you through the thick and thin.We brought the criminal
liable law
because we love you, what happened is not the character of our
party, we say we are sorry,» he added.
Because each
party is still held
liable in the eyes of the bank, it's also highly likely that the account is being reported to each person's credit.
We will not be
liable for instance: (1) if the Transfer is not complete, or is reversed,
because a third
party does not permit the Transfer; (2) if circumstances beyond our control (such as fire or flood) prevent the Transfer, despite reasonable precautions we have taken; or (3) if there are other exceptions stated in our agreement with you.
In fact, applying for joint credit is typically a bad idea,
because it locks two people in as
liable parties rather than just one.
The purpose of the statute of frauds is to protect people from being held
liable on informal communications
because they may be made without sufficient consideration or expressed ambiguously or
because such a communication might be fraudulently alleged against the
party to be charged.
Because there are multiple
parties that may be
liable in a truck accident case, such as the truck driver and the trucking company, there may be multiple insurance companies with which you may make a claim.
If the Commission (and the Court) followed this path, it would have concluded first that AC - Treuhand was a
party at the (cartel) agreement and thus violated 101, and then it had to provide an argument (this is not that difficult, a simple reference to the facilitating role of AC - T would do) that it should be excluded / not responsible / not
liable to a certain extent,
because it had a (mere) facilitating role.
For a strict liability claim, you are asserting that the other
party is
liable for your injuries
because they are responsible for the defect.
One of the reasons truck accident litigation is so complicated is
because of the number of
parties who can be held
liable for the accident.
If you have been hurt, or if a loved one has been killed
because of someone else's negligence or reckless disregard on a construction site, the negligent
party (or
parties) may be
liable for your injuries.
It is sometimes difficult to find
parties liable because evidence disappears.
He argues, first, that lawyers can not be held
liable for endorsements posted by third
parties,
because any ethics restrictions would be preempted by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Or, if the accident occurred
because of a third -
party's actions, such as a brake defect that caused the crash, this third
party (in this case, the brake manufacturer) may be
liable.
These damages are often substantial
because they're meant to teach the
liable party a lesson and protect others from experiencing the same trauma you've endured.
This fee award was affirmed
because plaintiff alleged a signatory defendant was the alter ego of the nonsignatory
party and, had plaintiff prevailed on this theory, the nonsignatory would have been
liable for fees under Reynolds Metals (one of our Leading Cases).
Court reversed trial court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, holding that defendants could not be held
liable for conspiring to interfere with contractual relations
because they were a
party to the contract.
Basically, in your negligence case, you must prove that the other
party is
liable or responsible for any harm caused to you
because of the accident.
They held the carry - over of the effect of a governing collective agreement is restricted to that current agreement and does not survive any variation or renegotiation (partly
because it is improper to hold the transferee
liable under a fresh or varied agreement to which he was not a
party).
If you put your bike in the hands of a transport company, then you will want to check with your insurance company about how it is covered during that time,
because it may be the third
party who would be held
liable for damage when the bike is in their care.
In recent years, third
party only insurance has become much more expensive, especially for younger drivers,
because they are more
liable to have an accident and need to pay out from their policy.
For example, if your tenant or a guest is injured
because of a repair issue you should have known about and fixed, the injured
party might name you as
liable.
The court also considered whether the Broker was individually
liable for the actions of Crank
because the
parties were in an agency relationship.
It's a mistake and even if it was an innocent mistake; if the real estate agent or broker knew or should have known the information was incorrect they will be held
liable to the injured
party if they have been damaged
because of the mistake or omission.