And the real estate tycoon's recent announcement about how he planned to «open up» U.S.
libel laws if elected arguably also falls into this category.
Not exact matches
Trump has made it clear that he is not a fan of the media, and has said that
if he becomes president he intends to «open up»
libel laws to make it easier to sue the press for reporting certain things.
«So when Trump says he wants to «open up»
libel law, he really means (
if he has the slightest knowledge of the
law) that he wants to open up — to change — the First Amendment, which, beginning in 1964, has been held to require in cases brought by public figures, proof that what was said was false, and that the newspaper knew or suspected that it was false.
«
If passed, it could provide a model in
libel law for countries across the world, and secure the biggest shake up of English
libel law for a generation.»
Under current
law, a
libel can be issued in Britain
if someone viewed an article on a website from the UK, regardless of where the website is based.
It would be great
if we could develop a cross-party consensus on
libel law reform.
Perhaps,
if and when Lord Lester's
Libel Bill gets passed into
law some people will follow Corporal Jones» advice «Don't panic!».
Do you know the difference between
libel and slander
laws in the US vs. varied European countries, and are you sure you're in the clear
if you're published there?
«
If libel laws were that tight, the denialosphere would be non-existent.»
My thoughts are that
if they are declared not guilty, then the accusations against them are not true, and thus easily fall foul of
Libel laws in the UK, at the very least.
It is usually too broad a question
if not specified to one country as most legal questions have different answers under the
laws of different countries and this would absolutely apply in the case of
libel law.
Basically, the author is saying that
if the First Amendment were interpreted in the way described, as an all - purpose shield — and therefore, journalists were not subject to
libel laws, and could not be searched or deposed — then journalists, being all but above the
law at that point, would have a tremendous amount of power.
Under D.C.
law, government officials have absolute immunity in actions for
libel and slander - even
if their statements are false and defamatory - provided that two conditions apply.
The Conservatives say they would hold a «fundamental review» of
libel law,
if elected.