As Adam Cohen describes in this New York Times story, because the Internet disseminates material published in the United States worldwide, authors and journalists otherwise protected by the First Amendment are finding themselves dragged within the purview of the more restrictive
libel laws on the books in other countries.
Not exact matches
The story of philo «Semitism is not presented as an alternative way of considering the modern Jewish experience: indeed, as the Rubinsteins show, it arose in large part in response to worldwide persecution and violence against Jews» from the infamous Damascus «blood
libel,» to the institution of anti «Jewish
laws in Italy, to pogroms in Russia, to the Dreyfus case, and
on into the Nazi era.
A statement issued by Nana Ato Dadzie and George Loh, lawyers for the three, said the sentence was «harsh and excessive», adding: «We also do not believe that citizens of Ghana ought to be committed to prison for infractions
on free expression especially in light of the repeal of the criminal
libel law.
Under current
law, a
libel can be issued in Britain if someone viewed an article
on a website from the UK, regardless of where the website is based.
The amendment to the civil liberties policy motion read: «The protection of freedom of expression, by reforming the
libel laws in England and Wales to ensure a better balance is provided between free speech, responsible journalism, scientific discourse and the public interest
on one hand and powerful corporations, wealthy individuals and vested interests
on the other.»
To commit citizens of Ghana to jail
on account of what they have said at a time when democratic societies are moving away from such a practice would appear to roll back all the gains made since the repeal of the criminal
libel law.
Sunder -
on your final point, PEN and Index
on Censorship are about to publish the report in our inquiry into
libel laws.
It would be great if we could develop a cross-party consensus
on libel law reform.
A state
law co-authored by state Assemblyman Rory Lancman (D - Fresh Meadows) protecting journalists who report
on terrorism from
libel lawsuits in other countries that has since become federal
law is now gaining traction across the pond.
I know there are some who take issue with the media
on several fronts, and even go so far as to criticise me for my part in the repeal of the Criminal
Libel Law, for it made the media «too free».
No fewer than five police vans, scores of armed policemen and operatives of the Department of State Services were deplored in the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin
on Thursday to forestall the breakdown of
law and order as the
libel suit filed by the Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, against an online medium, SaharaReporters, and its publisher, Omoyele Sowore, came up for hearing.
This was the sort of case which showed up exactly how inadequate our
libel laws are when confronted with rumour - mongering of this scale
on social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter.
The long - overdue reform of English
libel law and its chilling effect
on free speech has begun, but the battle isn't won yet, warns Simon Singh
Last month, however, after two years of campaigning by scientists and free speech activists, the UK government published a draft defamation bill, the first step
on the road to reforming English
libel law.
The long - overdue reform of English
libel law and its chilling effect
on free speech has begun, but the battle isn't won yet
Several high - profile lawsuits have prompted prominent researchers and U.K. groups such as Index
on Censorship and Sense about Science to complain that U.K.
libel laws — and the high costs of defending a
libel action — are forcing researchers and scientific journals to censor or edit academic material.
In an earlier report
on 10 December, the The Times noted how Britain's
libel laws were also influencing the decisions of scientific journals, quoting British Medical Journal Editor Fiona Godlee:
As bloggers have noted, this case will be one of the first tests of a new Texas
law designed to discourage capricious
libel suits by putting the burden
on the plaintiff (Wakefield in this case) to prove that the defendants» speech has caused damage before the suit can go forward.
He brought the suit [in Britain] because British
libel law puts the burden
on the defendants — in this case, Ms. Lipstadt and Penguin — to prove the truth of their assertions.
«English
libel law is so intimidating, so expensive, so hostile to serious journalists that it has a chilling effect
on all areas of debate, silencing scientists, journalists, bloggers, human rights activists and everyone else who dares to tackle serious matters of public interest.»
When one steps outside the bounds of civility and collegiality, descending into hyperbolic rant, name - calling and unsupportable accusations, one opens themselves to receiving the same back again, and to the force of
laws on libel and slander.
He was in the news again this week for being named the defendant in a
libel suit by Joanne St. Lewis, a
law professor at UofO, over a blog post
on Rancourt's site, UofO Watch.
On the flip side, suppose I report «Mr. Caswell is the Creeper and Bank Robber», prior to Caswell receiving a guilty verdict in a court of
law, I am committing
libel.
Interestingly, we also have specific protection against foreign
libel judgments, so I'll just be focusing
on American
law.
Isabel Hudson, associate and specialist in
libel and privacy
law at Carter - Ruck, says: «The case serves as a reminder that it's not just the press who can find themselves
on the receiving end of a
libel or privacy claim.
In addition to his court appearances, John has written extensively
on public
law for the UK and South African jurisdictions, and published a number of journal articles
on libel.
Anyone interested in reading further about Canada's blasphemy
law should definitely check out Jeremy Patrick's excellent paper Not Dead, Just Sleeping: Canada's Prohibition
on Blasphemous
Libel as a Case Study in Obsolete Legislation, which is available here.
A
libel case, like all lawsuits, involves the government's judicial branch using its coercive power to make you pay money as a result of your speech, based
on a
law requiring you to pay money for certain kinds of speech.
Through a series of meetings and presentations, we will share perspectives
on libel and defamation
law, media access to judges and court proceedings, media coverage of court proceedings and other issues of common interest.
The case gives rise to a number of interesting
libel law questions and casts doubt
on the appropriateness of a proposed new «public interest defence».
President Trump has been vocal about his disdain for the press, vowing to toughen
libel laws and crack down
on so - called fake news.
How would I feel about a client seeing me breaking bread with the same prosecutor or cop who is trying to get my client locked up, particularly in instances where I feel the prosecution is based
on false evidence, an effort to obtain a disproportionately severe sentence, or a
law that I feel should be stricken or heavily decriminalized in the first place (e.g., I want the legalization of marijuana, prostitution, gambling, criminal
libel and obscenity and the heavy decriminalization of all other drugs)?
Officials in the Centennial State quickly erased the
law after the District Attorney's office was forced to shell out about $ 425,000
on account of a criminal
libel warrant gone terribly wrong.
Though the Supreme Court of the United States has not banned criminal defamation statutes
on a federal level, in Garrison v. Louisiana, the court strongly suggested that those types of slander and
libel laws had no place in modern society.
... I am unable to accept that under English
law, a claimant in a
libel action
on an internet publication is entitled to rely upon a presumption of
law that there has been substantial publication.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Legislation to Repeal Canada's Blasphemy
Law Applauded by National Secularist Organization TORONTO,
ON --(Marketwired — June 08, 2017)-- The Canadian Secular Alliance (CSA) applauds the government's legislation to repeal Section 296 (blasphemous
libel) from the Canadian Criminal -LSB-...]
As one of the first
law firms to concentrate
on Internet defamation
law and online trade
libel, Kelly / Warner lawyers have successfully handled hundreds of online
libel matters — both domestic and international.
We reported last year
on how the sheriff of Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, relying
on the state's old and constitutionally infirm criminal -
libel law, had raided the house and seized the computers of a local man suspected of being responsible for a gadfly blog that had criticized the sheriff and other community figures.
«I think that the sealing order is incorrect under Washington
law and under the First Amendment,» said Volokh, who's known as an authority
on free speech issues and recently intervened to unseal a
libel case in Nevada.
The employers» organizations began to act
on this and from the 1830s the state entered into protracted negotiations with the industry of the
laws of
libel.
It is also concerning to think that it might join that long list of situations where lawyers have been used in a way that has retarded debate
on important health issues (such as, in extremis, this memorable episode when a High Court judge criticised Andrew Wakefield for trying to use
libel law to silence his critics).
Does the Act «reverse the chilling effect
on freedom of expression of current
libel law» or is it damp squib which will make defamation cases more complex?
That's an important step
on the path to bring British
libel law in line with basic principles of free speech and common sense that all blawgers should be happy to see.
Romanova v Sloutsker: for the appellant Russian journalist
on behalf of Media
Law Defence Initiative in her challenge to Court of Appeal against jurisdiction judgment -LRB-[2015] EWHC 545 (QB)-RRB- permitting the
libel claim of a Russian oligarch to be brought in the English courts.
Julian Porter QC acted for Toronto Life: a
libel law legend, author of the wonderfully lucid «Libel: a Handbook for Canadian Publishers, Editors, and Writers» and occasional commentator on Libel and Social M
libel law legend, author of the wonderfully lucid «
Libel: a Handbook for Canadian Publishers, Editors, and Writers» and occasional commentator on Libel and Social M
Libel: a Handbook for Canadian Publishers, Editors, and Writers» and occasional commentator
on Libel and Social M
Libel and Social Media.
University of Ottawa
law professor Joanne St. Lewis sued former Ottawa physics professor Denis Rancourt for $ 1 million for
libel after he called her a «house negro»
on his U of O Watch blog.
The Bill, which had its first reading last week, seeks to answer concerns that the current
law on libel is costly, vague and uncertain, and is stifling debate by encouraging self - censorship.
University of Ottawa
law professor Michael Geist says Canadian bloggers need to be aware that by effectively becoming publishers, they are subject to the
laws on defamation and
libel.
The
law penalizes falsely soiling a person's reputation, but it is (rarely and slimly) possible that a person's reputation is already so soiled that no further damage can be done, see for instance Jackson v. Longcope, 394 Mass. 577 and references therein
on libel - proof plaintiffs.
Mr Justice Eady, the most senior
libel judge in England and Wales, sat
on the Calcutt committee in 1990 which considered the introduction of a privacy
law.