Sentences with phrase «liberal and conservative approaches»

Consider the analogy, for example, between liberal and conservative approaches to crime and to education.

Not exact matches

The Liberal leader will contrast his «feminism» and the CCB with the retro family values approach of the Conservatives.

GHG policies will induce significant expenditures, whether they follow the regulatory approach proposed by the Conservatives, the cap - and - trade approaches proposed by the Liberals and the NDP, or the broad carbon pricing approach -LSB-...]

Yet I suspect that more than a few churchpeople, conservative and liberal, continue to scorn those who relish the earnest, homespun approach of Charlie Shedd, Neva Coyle and Gwen Shamblin — those who pray feelingly about issues that may not seem to the rest of us to be on God's top list of concerns.

But Morrison believed that despite the Republican incumbent's adherence to «rugged individualism» and his overly cautious approach to the depression, he would be more liberal — or at least more responsibly conservative — than Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt.

This paper presents an approach to social and legal policy that would combine many concerns of both liberals and conservatives, that would work patiently toward long - range goals, that would embrace a dialogical notion of the common good, and that would seek to promote the general welfare by attending to the conditions under which individuals, families, and communities prosper.

But it is also possible that it may presage the development of an American third way between the harsh and unrealistic hands - off approach to social problems espoused by many conservatives, and the rigorously secular governmental programs favored by many liberals.

According to popular assumptions, liberal approaches to the Bible emphasize messages of social action and downplay supernatural intervention, while conservative or traditionalist views accept the miraculous and advocate quietist or reactionary politics.

: Here is a theology that aims to be neither conservative nor liberal, and offers fresh approaches to scripture and Christian life.

Though both conservative and liberal approaches have failed, we are not necessarily at an impasse.

Neither the traditional liberal approach that relies on the federal government's initiative nor the conservative approach, that looks to the marketplace, can adequately create and preserve housing for low - income people.

But the radicality with which the criticism of Scripture has been carried out in terms of modern historiographical methods, the intense concern to find within the Scripture that meaning and message which is of vital relevance in our situation, should warn us that the distinction of conservative and liberal is not relevant to the distinction between this approach to theology and others.

This approach, which one finds both in liberal mainline churches and in conservative evangelical ones, owes a great deal to the liberal Protestant theology of Friedrich Schleiermacher.

The government is charged vociferously with paying too much attention to faith groups (accused by left - liberal secularists of an unprincipled timidity on faith schools, being too open to faith engagement in third sector; and of being generally rather socially conservative; and, alternatively, by the right having a cynical multiculturalist approach to minority faiths as electoral blocs) and also of too little attention to faith (with some «competitive grievance» claims that Muslims are getting too much attention, by some claiming to speak for some other minority faiths and by some Christian voices; and traditionalists who think there is a secret project to do in every institution).

I think that with Obama there has been obviously a shift away from the kind of aggressive philosophically based approach of the Bush years to a liberal pragmatic one; and of course that is also opposed to what would be called conservative pragmatic approach, what Trevor might label «back to basics».

As the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term approaches, rumors of retirement have ramped up around Justice Anthony Kennedy, a pivotal judge who often bridges a gap on the bench between conservatives and liberals.

Two introductory chapters for Conservative and Labour leaders — there is a slightly different approach by the editors of Liberal leaders — consider what constitutes «Statecraft» — a framework for assessing Party Leaders.

This «progractionary» approach — fiscally conservative but socially liberal — left Cuomo vulnerable to a left - flank challenge, and his re-election campaign did little to tout the SAFE Act, which would have done more to whip up the GOP base than motivate progressive Democrats who simply stayed home.

The Wall Street Journal obtained an advance copy and reports that Cuomo uses the book to tout his accomplishments as a «progressive reformer» who accomplished liberal goals like same - sex marriage and gun control while taking a more conservative approach to economic issues.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have criticised the government's approach to the targets.

They approach the coalition practically, arguing that Liberal Democrat policies will be implemented and the worst excesses of a Conservative majority prevented.

In a year when incumbency does not provide its usual benefit, Mrs. Goodhue and her supporters did not want the Pataki forces to define the race as a simple choice between conservative and liberal approaches.

Liberals such as former secretary of labor Robert Reich and conservatives such as Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee support the approach, as do a growing number of climate scientists and economists.

Instead of viewing the left and the right as either inherently correct or wrong, a more scientific approach is to recognize that liberals and conservatives emphasize different moral values.

A few years ago, standards were being attacked by Christian conservatives fearful of the outcomes - based - education movement, which appeared to be succeeding in making a particular set of liberal expectations about attitudes and values the official approach.

Brokered by liberal stalwart Ted Kennedy and then - House Education Committee Chairman John Boehner in 2001, the law combined a tough - minded approach to accountability that appealed to conservatives with new funding for poor children supported by progressives.

«When the Conservatives published their invitation to join the Government of Britain, the Liberal Democrats said the Conservatives» approach to school reform «is completely muddled» and branded plans to reform the curriculum as «confused, ill thought out and naive».

As usual it is the liberal idea of subsidizing AGW and then proposing a carbon tax to shuffle the money around in a pointless tax and spend that can't possibly work, compared to an actual conservative approach of paying a fair price for a needed service in the open market that contrasts the two options available.

Of course, liberals and conservatives generally differ in respects other than the approach to risk.

To the extent that all of the major parties in the 2006 federal election acknowledged the problem of global warming and were taking steps to address it, though in different ways, (the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois with the Kyoto accord, and the Conservatives with a Made in Canada approach) it would be difficult to conclude that the audio statements by taking a position on global warming, were targeting one particular party or candidate or a particular party's policy.»

The Liberal government ignored the earlier letter and ratified Kyoto, while Prime Minister Harper's Conservative government in May 2006 announced that Canada would develop a «made in Canada» approach to tackling greenhouse gas emissions, saying that the emission levels of Kyoto were not realistic.

It was the conservatives fault and not the approach the liberals chose nor their administration of their approach.

In recent years a marked division has arisen in the court between liberals and conservatives, usually with a few judges having a more flexible approach which may place them in one camp or the other depending on the particular issue at stake.