In «Two Concepts of Liberty,» Berlin mounted an extended defense of what he understood to be
the liberal idea of freedom against its principal modern political competitors, fascism and communism.
Not exact matches
This «eye
of the heart» sees
freedom in a quite different way from the typical
liberal idea of unfettered choice.
Such economics had no place for
freedom either in the formulation
of economic
ideas — the
liberal faith was a dogma as absolute as that
of the most orthodox religion — or in the control
of economic affairs.
Here we can not go into the analyses
of each
of these trends or the adequacy
of Ferré's interpretation
of the recent trends in American theology, except to say that theologians
of different persuasions, with the possible exception
of the so - called
liberals, while recognizing the usefulness
of the history
of religions, nevertheless agree with Professor Hendrik Kraemer in stating that only theology «is able to produce that attitude
of freedom of the spirit and
of impartial understanding, combined with a criticism and evaluation transcending all imprisonment in preconceived
ideas and principles as ultimate standards
of reference.»
QS: The
idea that there is no problem with surveillance as long as you have nothing to hide simply points to the complacency
of the
liberal view
of freedom by contrast with the republican one.
I particularly think the
idea that it «would strike a fatal blow to one
of the basic
freedoms of a
liberal society:
freedom of association» is overstated.
A crisis that is bringing into question not only the principles
of asylum and
of free movement within the European Union but Europe's very
idea of itself as a space
of liberal values,
freedom, moral equality and human rights.