They are fed secular,
liberal ideas as if they are facts.
Not exact matches
Speaking with The Cincinnati Enquirer in February, Springer, who painted himself
as a «populist,
liberal progressive,» said the
idea of his candidacy gained steam because of Trump's victory.
This is an
idea - allowing private delivery within the publicly funded health care system - that the
Liberals have tolerated, and the Conservatives have a long list of quotations on their Web site designed to show that Harper's stance is the same
as the
Liberals».
Back in 2014, it was a good
idea for Trudeau and the
Liberals to start thinking of Conservatives
as neighbours —
as people with whom they would have to find common ground.
If a merger with the NDP, Alberta Party, and Greens,
as has been suggested by Calgary - Buffalo
Liberal MLA Kent Hehr, is unpalatable to Dr. Sherman, perhaps he could be convinced a merger with his party's federal namesake would not be a bad
idea.
One stops to think of actual countries of sand, which include more than a few particularly violent locales, places where people are not
as willing
as Mary Oliver to concede the comfy and common received
idea of
liberal Christianity that we all worship the same deity by «whatever name.»
This is called «prophetic Judaism,» an
idea that,
as Sherwin and others note, mimics Enlightenment - driven reconstructions of
liberal Protestantism.
But, if I am understanding Wright correctly, this
idea has consequences for both uber - conservative Christians (who may tend to see God's presence and revelatory activity
as limited the words printed in the Bible) and more
liberal Christians (who may prefer to think of the words of Joshua and Jeremiah
as entirely their own, and not the words of God).
If the
idea of prison abolition at first seems a bit impractical even to
liberals, it becomes somewhat more plausible
as the ideology is examined in juxtaposition with strategy and tactics.
Though it is not quite true that Gustafson and other
liberals «never enter into argument against Barth,» there is a pronounced tendency in
liberal theology to dismiss Barth's
idea of truth
as the self - authenticating word of God.
The
idea of neoconservatism
as a
liberal plot to highjack conservatism for the left might seem hopelessly dated» the social democratic wing of neoconservatism disappeared long ago» but it remains vibrantly alive in the pages of journals like Chronicles and in the imaginations of ideologues attracted to the candidacy of Pat Buchanan.
Such economics had no place for freedom either in the formulation of economic
ideas — the
liberal faith was a dogma
as absolute
as that of the most orthodox religion — or in the control of economic affairs.
But the
liberal hope of a reconciliation between the present age and Christian faith remains a powerful
idea,
as does the (entirely laudable) impulse to free Christian faith from the snarls of a partisan political conservatism.
The Promise of Christian Humanism: Thomas Aquinas on Hope by Dominic F. Doyle Crossroad, 248 pages, $ 34.95 Dominic F. Doyle offers a creative defense of the Christian humanism of Gaudium et Spes, which seeks to blend two
ideas that critics such
as the
liberal theologian Gordon Kaufman have not....
Here, it would have helped for Miller to articulate in greater depth,
as he does for Rawls's
liberal ideas, the positive principles behind the Republicans» voluntaristic, market - centered approach.
Similarly, Obama wasn't cast
as a social - fiscal
liberal with another set of
ideas for creating prosperity.
Yet Lindbeck's approach posed great challenges to
liberal ideas of religion
as some «universal feeling about the ultimate.»
As a young evangelical, I was looking for theologians who could help me break the stranglehold of liberal Protestantism and its faithless idea of religion as purely personal «sentiment.&raqu
As a young evangelical, I was looking for theologians who could help me break the stranglehold of
liberal Protestantism and its faithless
idea of religion
as purely personal «sentiment.&raqu
as purely personal «sentiment.»
Here we can not go into the analyses of each of these trends or the adequacy of Ferré's interpretation of the recent trends in American theology, except to say that theologians of different persuasions, with the possible exception of the so - called
liberals, while recognizing the usefulness of the history of religions, nevertheless agree with Professor Hendrik Kraemer in stating that only theology «is able to produce that attitude of freedom of the spirit and of impartial understanding, combined with a criticism and evaluation transcending all imprisonment in preconceived
ideas and principles
as ultimate standards of reference.»
The form of argument in this presentation has emphasized several specific points: first, that the Asian values argument,
as a challenge to the implementation of constitutional democracy, is exaggerated and fails to account for the richness of values discourse in the East Asian region - local values do not provide a justification for harsh authoritarian practices; second, that the cultural prerequisites arguments fail because they ignore the discursive processes for value development and they are tautological, excessively deterministic and ignore the importance of human agency it, therefore, makes little sense to take an entry test for constitutional democracy; third, the difficulties of importing Western communitarian
ideas into an East Asian authoritarian environment without adequate
liberal constitutional safeguards; fourth, the positive role of constitutionalism in constructing empowering conversations in modern democratic development and
as a venue for values discourse; fifth, the importance, especially in a cross-cultural context, of indigenization of constitutionalism through local institutional embodiment; and sixth, the value of extending research focused on the positive engendering or enabling function of constitutionalism to the developmental context in general and East Asia in particular.
I applaud people who have chosen that path and stick to it, and I must say I find it intensely tedious to listen to those cynical «vegan - bashers» who think they are amusing
as they snark away at vegans without having any
idea why they are even doing so, other than being threatened by something they don't understand, or by some vague aversion they have to any spiritual - sounding practice or «
liberal - hippie - sounding» philosophy.
QS: The
idea that there is no problem with surveillance
as long
as you have nothing to hide simply points to the complacency of the
liberal view of freedom by contrast with the republican one.
A crisis that is bringing into question not only the principles of asylum and of free movement within the European Union but Europe's very
idea of itself
as a space of
liberal values, freedom, moral equality and human rights.
We have a duty to scrutinize our modern day advantages, he avers,
as the
liberal idea of «social mobility» does not do enough to right past wrongs.
The
idea of plurinationalism implies an ethno - cultural conception of nation (s) that prevails over the
idea of the nation
as a political community founded on the principle of
liberal citizenship.
It is going to take a month or two to ensure the entire party is happy with the
ideas; and Politics.co.uk understands the senior Tories debating their options are still unclear about whether they might choose to incorporate some elements of Ken Clarke's
ideas involving a «grand committee»,
as favoured by the
Liberal Democrats.
After the attacks on the twin towers,
liberals dusted off his
ideas on a measured foreign policy
as an antidote to the Bush administration's use of «preventative war».
Inspired by the Khatami experiment and the AKP model, the
idea of an Islamist - led democratic order became attractive not only to the Islamists, but to many
liberals as well.
But the
idea that the way to revive the Labour Party or social democracy is by attacking a «metropolitan secular
liberal elite»,
as he does in several places in his speech, is utterly daft.
And influential think - tanks such
as the Resolution Foundation and the Social Market Foundation are now giving credence to the
idea that the
Liberal Democrats and the Labour Party may have more credible post-2015 deficit reduction strategies than a majority Conservative government.
Mike, perhaps rather than reading a couple of fringe blogs by right - libertarians (and even those don't hold the opinions you're attributing to them, but often talk about alternative economic
ideas like a citizens» income) who are about
as representative of mainstream
Liberal Democrat thought
as Tony Benn is of Labour, you should look at sites like http://socialliberal.net/, which more or less represents the mainstream of the party.
These
ideas contrast with those social
liberal principles held by Lord Oakeshott, the Lib Dem president, Tim Farron, many party members and previous leaders such
as Charles Kennedy.
Bluntly, your hope is that an issue that matters to you and to many educated middle - class people (but not to most Labour voters, who may well regard the
idea in the same way
as many Conservatives,
as a way to give unfair influence to
Liberal Democrats), electoral reform, is important enough to form an electoral alliance over, despite the fact this would leave many party members unable to vote (and who would get to stand in say Durham or Redcar anyway?).
So I tend to discount the
idea of the «Lib - Lab» pact so fondly fantasised about around here,
as it would be politically suicidal for the
Liberal Democrats («we're a new direction... oh hang on, we're supporting the very unpopular previous government»)
As a result he has put Labour and the
Liberal Democrats on the spot - they now will have to say whether they do support the
idea of a referendum on the European Union and Britain's membership of it when a bill comes back to Parliament.
One
idea that played a part in
Liberal debates in the 1960s — though it was never formally adopted
as party policy — was to use labour's profit share to invest in firms» assets so that, over time, workers would build up their own share in firms» wealth.
The
Liberal Democrats are said to oppose the «Boris Island»
idea and environmental groups have warned it would be «a disaster for the climate, and,
as a result, for people and wildlife in this country and globally.»
I read somewhere that the word «
liberal» became associated with communism, which is extremely hated in the US (I have no
idea if this is really why it changed, but it's
as good a reason
as any).
Donald Trump Jr. fired back at
liberal filmmaker Michael Moore, who questioned whether Mar - a-Lago had opened
as a shelter when Hurricane Irma hit the state, noting it's located on an island and in a mandatory evacuation zone, «probably not the best
idea, but you know, narrative!»
Rather, we would like to see Conservatives and
Liberal Democrats proposing their own
ideas separately —
as Nick Clegg did last week, with his welcome call for a further and faster rise in the income tax threshold.
The proposal has attracted criticism
as elitist: Staten Island State Senator Diane Savino derided the
idea on her Facebook page
as a «half - assed, feel - good limousine
liberal approach.»
Fifty - six percent of voters who identify
as liberals and 60 percent of New Yorkers who say they are conservative are against the
idea.
As I wrote in my article Beating the Welfare Bigots published on
Liberal Left, the whole
idea of «unemployed» people «working for their benefits» is dangerous double - think, creating a sub-category of community servants that are excluded from the minimum wage.
Tony Blair is really a closet
liberal, but has «an infuriatingly imperfect, even muddled idea of what it means», Paddy Ashdown today warns the seven Liberal Democrat MPs who want to succeed him as party
liberal, but has «an infuriatingly imperfect, even muddled
idea of what it means», Paddy Ashdown today warns the seven
Liberal Democrat MPs who want to succeed him as party
Liberal Democrat MPs who want to succeed him
as party leader.
Hague and Miller spoke out after Gerald Howarth, the defence minister, called on the government to abandon
liberal ideas such
as legalising gay marriage and reform of the House of Lords.
Its
ideas seemed
as liberal as the offerings of prawn - slathered canapés and hearty glasses of red wine available on every surface alongside copies of the glossy new booklet by the 2020 Group — led by Barker, Nadhim Zawahi MP and George Freeman MP, with at least 24 authoring and supporting Tory MPs.
The
idea that
liberals in government could sit by and watch
as the state took over regulation of a device meant to scrutinise it is appalling to me.
Ideas which are hostile to basic
liberal values such
as democracy, freedom and sexual equality.
The
Liberal Democrats would be likely to oppose it and even some Tory MPs, such
as Matt Hancock, would be likely to resist the
idea.
As the polls continue to point to an electoral deadlock, are Labour types warming towards the
idea of a deal with the
Liberal Democrats?