Judges Judith Rogers and Harry Edwards, two of the more
liberal judges on the D.C. Circuit, said no.
In a post where he appears to reveal more than his opinion of the numbers, Volokh writes, «This isn't
some liberal judge on the Ninth Circuit slamming the immigration bureaucracy — it's a moderate conservative, citing many opinions from the Seventh Circuit (which has a reputation as being pretty sane).
Not exact matches
When President Bush nominated
Judge Clarence Thomas to a vacancy
on the United States Supreme Court,
liberals opposed to confirming the nomination at first directed critical scrutiny to statements the nominee had made in favor of employing «natural law» in constitutional interpretation.
With the assistance of a massive lobbying effort
on the part of
liberal interest groups, Bork's detractors prevailed and
Judge Bork did not obtain the position for which he was so eminently qualified.
Liberal judges will be «activist» or «restrained» depending on what, in a given case, best serves whatever liberal cause is at
Liberal judges will be «activist» or «restrained» depending
on what, in a given case, best serves whatever
liberal cause is at
liberal cause is at issue.
Overall,
judging by the rapturous applause he received, Miliband was in sublime form: dynamic, incisive, intelligent (a man who can quote the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia and apply it to the current foreign policy debate between those who oppose
liberal interventionism based
on the principle of nation state sovereignty and those who support it based
on the natural rights of individuals superseding that sovereignty certainly deserves this accolade) and even at times funny.
Chief
Judge Roberts decision to side with the four
liberals on the court was blasted by conservative blogs.
As the end of the U.S. Supreme Court term approaches, rumors of retirement have ramped up around Justice Anthony Kennedy, a pivotal
judge who often bridges a gap
on the bench between conservatives and
liberals.
On our
liberal - conservative spectrum, the Republicans» payoff for approving a nominee will be 100 minus the Justice's liberalness score score, so a super conservative
judge (0) gives them a payoff of 100 (i.e. 100 — 0).
He said: «There is a view now in many parts of the world that the only way to ensure prosperity and stability is to suppress freedom to crack down
on pesky NGOs and irritating journalists and independent
judges and generally to deprecate the western
liberal consensus about how a society should be ordered.
And the
liberal - leaning
judge Rebecca Dallet won a spot
on the state Supreme Court.
«We're not talking about Ruth Bader Ginsberg, we're not talking about Elena Kagan,» said Bonventre, who says based
on previous opinions, he'd characterize the new
judges as «moderately
liberal.»
MPs agreed
on the 28 - day limit as a compromise, with a
judge reviewing the case every week, although the
Liberal Democrats still insisted it was draconian.
Now, two Democrats running for Ohio's open U.S. Senate seat in 2010 are seizing
on the chance to score points with
liberals and party activists - the kind of people who vote in Democratic primaries - by pledging to «to help lead the fight for the nomination of
Judge Sonia Sotomayor.»
The
Liberal Democrat negotiators also claimed that the Labour team, including Ed Balls, showed little interest in a deal,
judging by their body language and a refusal to shift
on fundamental issues.
For now, the effect of Trump's appointments
on environmental policy is limited because his appointments have not tipped the balance of
liberal and conservative
judges in any of the key appeals courts, including the 9th Circuit in California that encompasses Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
This set him apart from his more -
liberal colleagues, who viewed Brown v. Board of Education (1954) not as a prohibition
on the use of racial classifications in education, but rather as a mandate for
judges to do whatever they could to promote «equal educational opportunity.»
Judge Wood ruled that officials had not shown that the material
on the test «accurately measured the minimum knowledge about the
liberal arts and sciences that teachers need to be competent.»
The study, according to Duke, found a similar pattern in
liberal - leaning gun - control proponents when
judging data
on certain violent crimes:
And the ultimate decision
on validity will be made by a
judge with a
liberal arts degree.
To categorize think tanks as
liberal or conservative, 19 experts (14 faculty members and 5 graduate students from U.S. political science departments) judged the political orientation of an initial set of 36 think tanks listed as liberal or conservative on Wikipedia's List of think tanks in the United States in October, 2009.1 Experts indicated whether or not they felt knowledgeable enough to judge each think tank, and if so, rated its political orientation (1 = mainly Liberal / Democrat; 5 = mainly Conservative / Repub
liberal or conservative, 19 experts (14 faculty members and 5 graduate students from U.S. political science departments)
judged the political orientation of an initial set of 36 think tanks listed as
liberal or conservative on Wikipedia's List of think tanks in the United States in October, 2009.1 Experts indicated whether or not they felt knowledgeable enough to judge each think tank, and if so, rated its political orientation (1 = mainly Liberal / Democrat; 5 = mainly Conservative / Repub
liberal or conservative
on Wikipedia's List of think tanks in the United States in October, 2009.1 Experts indicated whether or not they felt knowledgeable enough to
judge each think tank, and if so, rated its political orientation (1 = mainly
Liberal / Democrat; 5 = mainly Conservative / Repub
Liberal / Democrat; 5 = mainly Conservative / Republican).
The fact is that the
judges» rulings
on the Mann case are not some
Liberal grab at your precious freedoms.
The facile pundits who claim Stevens is the Court's
liberal hero or bum — depending
on their point of view — overlook the fact that in 1987, Stevens publicly endorsed President Ronald Reagan's choice of archconservative
Judge Robert Bork to replace Justice Lewis Powell Jr..
If one can dare to summarise so rich and lucid a lifetime's argument, Dworkin rejected both the traditional view, that
judges must conform to established authority, and the belief of American
liberals, that
judges should seek to improve society, with a new emphasis
on the
judge's responsibility to uphold individual and collective morality.
Ally Ed Whelan, the very Voldemort to «
liberal activist»
judges and a former Scalia clerk, tossed his whole breadbasket in the National Review Online, to wit: «Richard A. Posner's Badly Confused Attack
on Scalia / Garner» Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5.
Otherwise the Supreme Court is telling 17 million British people that the whole thing was a waste of time and that the largest number of votes ever recorded
on any issue in the history of the British Isles was in fact a bad joke played by the «
liberal elite»
on a public
judged by them to be to dumb to know their own best interests!
The data you pulled at the outset
on the length of the
judge's previous trials might suggest just how
liberal or strict the
judge tends to be with the parties in trial.
We know from the high - crime era before mandatory minimums that
liberal judges will abuse that discretion to go soft
on serious offenders.
In an article in the Toronto Star, titled Russell Brown doesn't belong
on the Supreme Court, a former law professor attacks Justice Brown based
on two main themes: 1) He is not a
liberal, so he can't be a good
judge.
Judging by the backlogs in the courts, there are not enough
judges and / or courtrooms to handle all the cases in a timely manner, which is a basic function of the state
on any
liberal view, whether classical or social - democratic.
Given that fact,
liberals and conservatives alike argue, why not drop the pretense of apolitical
judges and support or oppose nominees
on the basis of their party label or ideology?
In recent years a marked division has arisen in the court between
liberals and conservatives, usually with a few
judges having a more flexible approach which may place them in one camp or the other depending
on the particular issue at stake.
That is, if interveners are shifting
judges in a more conservative or more
liberal direction, it appears that interveners are shifting the members of the Court as a bloc or, alternatively, not so far or so differentially as to cause
judges to occupy a different ranking in policy space vis - à - vis his or her colleagues
on the Court.
[48] An elections
judge noted that it was «immediately apparent that cheating the system would scarcely require the talents of Professor Moriarty... the leader of the
Liberal Democrats
on Birmingham Council [stated]: «the system invites fraud».»
For example, a friend of mine works for a well - known
liberal digital media company that uses Greenhouse ATS for its recruiting (note: I disapprove highly of using any ATS), but they require and
judge their applicants
on the quality of their cover letters.
I realize I was ignorant going in and too trusting, too
liberal to want to
judge based
on various factors.