Sentences with phrase «liberal scholars»

What are atheists and liberal scholars afraid of if they don't present all the evidence and both view points?

In building his case for why we can still believe the Bible, Blomberg effectively positions himself between liberal scholars who refuse to acknowledge the firm textual base on which the scriptures stand and ultraconservatives who insist on a rigidly literal reading of the Bible (often in the King James only) in the face of legitimate developments in our understanding of ancient manuscripts and genres.

Professor Bultmann's interpretation of the teaching of Jesus, however, differs radically from that popularized by liberal scholars of pre-World War One days.

Had it not been for the first editor of CT, I likely would have gone the way of liberal scholar Bart Ehrman.

So when liberal scholars and agnostics criticize the Bible and question its authority, we get defensive, not so much because of our theology of the Bible, but because it feels like they are attacking a loved one.

While more liberal scholars believe this period of time lasted millions (or billions) of years, even the most the most conservative biblical scholars say that there was about 2000 years between Genesis 1 and Genesis 12.

IF liberal scholars can blame the near - miss aspect of the Cuban Missile Crisis on the U.S. military brass being too aggressive (the case factually made by the 13 Days book and film), what does the blame amount to?

Ambitious liberal scholars think of essays in The Nation as proud achievements.

At Berlin, Bonhoeffer encountered a galaxy of erudite but often liberal scholars.

The Christian churches have been reluctant to follow the lead of even their own liberal scholars.

Liberal scholars tended either to rationalize the stories, or to speak movingly of «the supreme meaning of Jesus» wonders: God's will of mercy and salvation was expressing itself through him,» (E. J. Goodspeed, Life of Jesus [New York: Harper & Bros., 1956], pp. 55f.)

Liberal scholars looked for culture - affirming eternal truths in scripture and otherwise deconstructed the canonical text into historical - critical fragments.

[5] As an economic philosophy, neoliberalism emerged among European liberal scholars in the 1930s as they attempted to trace a so - called «third» or «middle» way between the conflicting philosophies of classical liberalism and socialist planning.

Biblical interpretation is no longer bound by patristic and scholastic presuppositions about the divine aseity, nor is it bound by the deistic assumptions of liberal scholars.

at least those liberal scholars who disagree with this conclusion are giving the statistical data a hearing and recognize it for what it is: a serious archeologically and statistically based argument that can not be shelved in «5 minutes.»

Again, he is an AGNOSTIC, liberal scholar, often regarded as the far left of biblical scholarship... in other words, if you had a friend in the field, it'd be him...

this article is a gross mischaracterization of Biblical Truth, written by a liberal scholar who seeks to use the Bible to justify his own end, instead of the Lord's end.

Being the liberal scholars and teachers that they were, they were generally very critical of the Bible and what it had to say and how it had to say it.

I've gotten irritated with all the press these liberal scholars and theologians get when they make an unorthodox statement.

We experienced these latter consequences three years ago when a number of left - liberal scholars, politicians, and pundits attempted to read Judge Robert Bork out of the American political and constitutional mainstream.

Some liberal scholars find the significance of this story in the tension between farmers (represented by Cain) and seminomads (represented by Abel).

Liberal scholars had theorised that much of these two books had been composed many centuries later but the material evidence continues to confirm their antiquity.

Only those liberal scholars who attribute the first 2 Gospels to someone other than the claimed writers date it later.

I told her that Strong was a liberal scholar and didn't know what he was talking about.

Instead of following through with their historical research to the end, the liberal scholars always stopped at a point at which they were able to present a Jesus who was, in fact, an image of the scholar himself; or of the scholar's ideals.

The issue was squarely joined and a century - long battle has been waged by the «ultras» against what they regarded as an attack upon the Bible with the intent to destroy it, but what was from the standpoint of the liberal scholar, his attempt to discover the truth about the Bible, and to preserve it from its friends in an age of almost universal questioning.

He notes that even on the Court, one Republican appointee seemed to reject the individual rights approach, as did most of the liberals (though, as Bob Ambrogi described in yesterday's post, plenty of liberal scholars and jurists are coming around to the individual rights view — which Volokh notes in his post as well).