Sentences with phrase «liberal skeptics in»

Believe it or not, there are liberal skeptics in the climate community, as there are also perfectly patriotic liberals in this nation.

Not exact matches

[«While these claims have been made repeatedly over the last century, the truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable to cite a single piece of solid archaeological evidence in support of their claims.

You could see from the footnotes and the questions I asked that I've read all the liberal literature, I've read the atheist literature — and I stood in the shoes of the skeptic as I asked the tough questions — I just didn't find them convincing.

I'm a liberal Christian, come to Christ in my thirties, and still a skeptic and a doubter.

I find concerned liberals are loath to talk about how consistently wrong climate models have been or about the «pause» in global warming that has gone on for over fifteen years, while climate skeptics avoid discussion of things like ocean acidification and accelerated melting in Greenland and the Arctic.

Environmental and climate scientists in the U.S. are overwhelmingly liberal; Kerry Emanuel has been identified as one of the very few consensus climate scientists that is Republican (and one of the few that will interact with skeptics, see the EconTalk interview).

Skeptics often accuse the media of being biased, arguing that a liberal bias in the media causes them to shortchange skeptical climate arguments.

Yes, I get that this is an article of faith for many of you politically conservative «skeptics» (* cough * faux skeptics * cough *); you dislike the liberal policy proposals made in response to climate change, so you distort the science and act as if everything will be OK.

In fact, some liberals complain that the media includes too many skeptics.

, his ignorance is real, not perhaps pretended as in the case of the Liberal and National Party climate change skeptics.

Of course, we can't be highly confident if we assume bias by ideology, and it would be a mistake for me to do so in your case (just as it would be a mistake to do so in Dan's case - even though I can point you to many cases where «skeptics» have assumed bias in Dan's case by labeling him as a «liberal» or «AGW zealot» or whatever)..