Sentences with word «liberalism»

There is a very different strain of liberalism in this party.

Even so, the large size of the two secular groups helps explain the power of social liberalism in national politics.

What does this mean for the future of social liberalism?

This is why conservatives will claim classical liberalism as their own.

No mainstream party now speaks for liberalism in this sense.

However, some American fiscal conservatives view wider social liberalism as an impetus for increased spending on these programs.

In the preceding lecture I dealt with liberalism without discussing its relation to social issues.

How we are to evaluate and challenge creatively the heirs of modern liberalism depends on what we take freedom to be, and not to be.

This retreat came as a reaction to the theological liberalism of the «social gospel» movement.

The idea that the right means less government comes from liberalism.

Selected essays on liberalism, tradition, and civil society by one of the more humane social thinkers of this American century.

In the case both of higher education and of government, the controlling definition of reality is supplied by liberalism.

Some political parties (ie economic liberalism) want a «weak» state that has less influence, other seek a strong one.

American political liberalism is not in a robust state of health.

The call to be compassionate is not an invention of contemporary liberalism.

And that has indeed been one of the recurring qualities of Protestant liberalism.

I am not free to perform the theological reduction that marks the shift to humanity in religious liberalism.

In sum, the problem with Christian liberalism does not concern its lack of clarity about what can and can not change within the hierarchy of truths.

It is doubtful that any society, certainly any free society, could long persist on the basis of secular liberalism alone.

From housing, to opportunity, to the refugee crisis, he gave an honest account of what liberalism looks like, both in terms of policy and rhetoric.

The twin outcomes of this effort, the depletion of moral self - command and the depletion of material resources, make inevitable an inquiry into what comes after liberalism.

They told him to stay in post and fight to defend the cause of liberalism at the general election.

In today's discussions about liberalism and its future, Politics of the Person stands to enrich our appreciation of democracy and human rights.

The critical element however is in optimal economic growth this century, the conditions for which were defined by classic liberalism over the past two centuries.

Just what is this «active, muscular liberalism» that the prime minister is calling for, and how do we know when we're doing it?

Stop giving into sin, stop giving into liberalism.

There is, again, considerable support for this in the tradition I am calling alternative liberalism.

Ethical liberalism does not assume this, but instead assumes that people have some concept of «good» (or virtue) that helps them decide what to do.

But for those who care about understanding liberalism, a more precise knowledge of its foundations should be welcome.

I will pick up from my discussion of how liberalism has been radically open to the sciences and to historical scholarship.

Only now the compulsive state religion, or at least our new civil religion, is supposed to be progressive liberalism.

That process will ask hard questions, to which the history of British liberalism supplies some of the answers.

Eventually, his theological and political liberalism became more than leaders in the denomination could bear, and he lost his career of 19 years.

But even here the influence of therapeutic liberalism makes itself felt.

There are some signs of more assertive liberalism today.

It is a racist ideology which emerges when liberalism breaks down and people are unable to realistically analyse society.

This sounds very much like the earlier liberal analysis of the situation, but it differs from the earlier liberalism in one fundamental respect.

Its immature on your part and its part of the reason why liberalism is getting its clock cleaned in this country.

It is the propaganda arm of Democratic liberalism, plain and simple.

Contemporary liberalism promotes the twin ideals of individual autonomy and equality.

I like to agree with you but European liberalism has brought about these problems.

The implication of philosophical liberalism is that all matters of religious and moral belief are purely private.

They have shown procedural liberalism does not even work on its own terms.

In this way they enter into a relationship of conflict with liberalism rather than simply offering a different emphasis.

We may mention in passing that such liberalism is actually very old - fashioned.

You seem to think liberalism ended in the late 80s; untrue, else why would conservatives keep screaming about liberal bias in the media?