Sentences with phrase «liberals are right about»

Is there ONE single issue that liberals are right about?

Not exact matches

If he gets critical coverage, then it's obvious that he was right about the untrustworthy liberal media — something he routinely criticizes at his rallies — and he still wins.

«This is not about the left or the right, conservative or liberal,» Tim Cook wrote in response to the protests and violence in Charlottesville.

Chrystia Freeland, The Globe and Mailâ $ ™ s candidate in Toronto Centre, recently wrote a book about inequality (which I have not yet read) and is supposed to â $ œbring fresh thinking to the Liberal Partyâ $ ™ s economic team.â $ She has already attracted a few jabs from right - wingers Terence Corcoran and William Watson.

I think you're right about vote splitting but Why is it the Liberals fragmenting the vote?

Of course since they are both Democrats the same idiot right - wingers who make idiotic comments about liberals will bash Spitzer and Schumer both and say they are too stupid to score that high on the SAT even though clearly Schumer and Spitizer are orders of magnitude more intelligent than them and all their right - wing heroes

When Jesus returns, I don't think he will automatically fall into the Conservative camp, with all his radical beliefs about shunning wealth and individual rights, Jesus just may be the biggest Liberal of them all.

They seem to think that it is enough merely to be right about liberals having been wrong on this question.

You certainly have a right to your opinion about everything from gay marriage to anything else that you deem «sinful», or otherwise, but why do you feel the need to assume that everyone who shares this articles» opinion is a liberal Obama - loving Democrat?

If those guys are largely right about the incentive factors that would then come into play (and especially if Americans were moderating their economic libertarianism with devotion to family, virtue, community, and God, as your work would urge them to), then by no means would that cause the social welfare policy disaster most liberals assume it would.

Right wing conservative types have a Jesus who is against gay marraige, is anti-abortion, thinks there should be prayer in school, and teaches the prosperity stuff and so on... Left wing liberal Christians quote the verses about giving up possessions, feeding and clothing the poor... inner city Christians often have a Jesus who is about social justice... we were made in His image?

Oh, and Rush is a loud mouth who only sometimes gets it right, and that's more of an admission than you'd ever get from a liberal about their Bill Maher, Chris Matthews, or other liberal blowhard.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

The liberal voices in the churches have long been reluctant to say anything too critical about fundamentalists, on the grounds that they have every right to live by the beliefs they feel most comfortable with.

I for one agree more with conservative fiscal policies because I believe in the long run they will bring about less poverty, while liberal fiscal policies only provide very short term help and ultimately cause more poverty in the long run (maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right).

Rather than drawing attention to the distinctiveness of the Judeo - Christian tradition, liberal civil religion is much more likely to include arguments about basic human rights and common human problems.

It's not about Rush being «right,» it's about him thinking that Pope should change Jesus» message just because it's too liberal for his taste.

In the third of a century since then, the attacks on moderate evangelicals have come from the fundamentalist right — ask Graham about that — while moderates and liberals have done what moderates and liberals are supposed to do: they say they see some neoevangelical points, and they issue some cease - fires.

He was wrong about married bishops, but dead right to home in on the fact that those within the ordinariates «will be free of liturgical interference by liberal Catholic bishops who are unsympathetic to their conservative stance».

It's not about being located right in the middle of the liberal / conservative continuum; it's about holding your opinions loosely and with a sense of humor.

Enough is enough and let us kick the liberal politically correct naive liberals right in the butt and tell them if you don't like it here: Go to China or to a Muslim country and see what they think about their own cultural heritage.

how does fair, unbiased CNN, AKA ACNN (Anderson Cooper News Network) pick and choose stories as noteworthy... a comment is made by a very elderly priest, probably not quoted properly, and is «front page news» on CNN's website... this same man (priest) has written many great books, done a lot of great charity work in the poorer parts of New York and nothing is ever posted on the website... but something is said incorrectly and its published... is this fair, is it right, is it unbiased or is the motivation to make an entire Church lokk bad and let the anti-Catholic screwballs have their heyday in hateful posts... I didn't see this wonderful netwrok post anything about the disgusting, bigoted and hateful attacks, written by the liberal left wing media elites, like Maureen Dowd, against Rep. Paul Ryan and his Catholic faith... it's all acceptable to you liberal HYPOCRITES!

I've been called a socialist and a baby - killer for voting for Barack Obama, an enemy of the Church for asking questions about biblical inerrancy, a Buddhist for reading Thich Nhat Hahn, and a raging liberal for supporting basic civil rights for gays and lesbians.

So were Hannity and Fox News right about the liberal media and their skewed polls?

My candidate for a «prophet to the liberals» is Will Campbell, publisher of the journal Katallagete and author of the highly acclaimed Brother to a Dragonfly, an autobiographical book about the lives of Will and his brother, Joe, as they leave their father's small cotton farm in Mississippi — Will to become a civil rights worker for the National Council of Churches, Joe to become a small - town pharmacist.

The part about not wearing fabric made from tow kinds of thread can be ignored, and the part about loving your fellow man is obviously something added recently by liberals, right?

But if one is actually just looking to start some drama about how liberals are ruining bathrooms, then it looks like she went to the right place.

The tendency has been to bog down in fights between the Right and the Left, where conservatives were worried that character education programs were all about teaching mushy diversity and general sort of tolerance, and liberals were worried that character education was about teaching religion and more conservative values.

As a «liberal» you have great trust in government... and are concerned about «right - wingers», though they also greatly trust government, but differ on a few specifics.

And I'd like to help get the well - meaning liberals out of that absurd position, of accidentally endorsing the far right on a supposedly anti-racist ticket, and being massively behind where most people got to when it came to England and football - without thinking so much about it - at least 15 - 20 years ago.

The prior assumption is that Catalonia is a specific demos that has the right to decide about its future according to liberal - democratic values and rules.

The move to cut these programs is about symbolic grievances and perceived bias and a result that gets these agencies funded in a manner that causes these agencies to be more apolitical or to try to be more balanced on a liberal - conservative perspective would be considered a win by the partisans on the right.

If you look at where the lack of caution was, it was The Guardian, maybe the Independent, Channel 4 — the liberal opposition and not the right wing press, which in other circumstances are often very concerned about state intrusion.

Questioned about what the Liberal Democrats stance would be if there is a hung parliament, Mr Clegg declared that the party with the «biggest mandate» after the election would have a «moral right» to govern.

Fifth, the right wing websites, who would never be caught dead reading a hostile left wing website and who would never read anything written by actual scientists (who they consider to either be part of the liberal elite or part of an ill - defined conspiracy), never hear about what poor science the study they're celebrating actually is, and go right on believing that their anti-global warming position is so obviously correct that everyone else must either be fools or conspirators.I believe the link pfft posted is step three.

Mike, perhaps rather than reading a couple of fringe blogs by right - libertarians (and even those don't hold the opinions you're attributing to them, but often talk about alternative economic ideas like a citizens» income) who are about as representative of mainstream Liberal Democrat thought as Tony Benn is of Labour, you should look at sites like http://socialliberal.net/, which more or less represents the mainstream of the party.

If anyone is to blame its the protesters, the Liberals MPs there is suport and the Labour supprters like you who urge them on You may be right about a watershed moment.

Religion is also of little consequence, the right is mostly socially liberal so the issues are more about economics and governance.

Twenty - seven percent of poll respondents described Cuomo as «too liberal,» while 14 percent say he is «too conservative» and 49 percent say he is «about right.»

I am afraid Labour in 1992 was and alliance between left wing middle class liberals and thick right wing working class Labour MPs and few if any really understood what Thatcherism / Neo-Liberalism was really about.

«I simply have decided I'm not really going to talk about that issue anymore because every time I'm gaining momentum the liberal press says, «Let's talk about gay rights,»» he said at the time.

Chris Keates General Secretary of the NASUWT: «The Liberal Democrats are right to raise concerns about the cuts to the pay of those who are delivering vital public services».

More internal conflicts have been brought about because the anticipated bills are a bit of a scatter gun ensemble of the left and right, the liberal and conservative.

«It's all about race,» Wimes said, noting the difference in EMILY's List's involvement in this race compared to its neutrality in the 2014 gubernatorial Democratic primary when longtime abortion - rights liberal, former state Sen. Nan Rich, ran against former Gov. Charlie Crist, who had been a self - styled «pro-life» Republican before leaving the GOP.

If we want a liberal, pluralist realignment of the left, which is CKs stated ambition, that means having competing parties, and it sometimes means those parties will disagree so much about fundamentali issues that a coalition with elements of the Right is necessary.

His careful attempts to position the party as a brake on the more right - wing instincts of the Conservatives have been blown off course by having to deal with serious allegations about Liberal Democrat conduct and defend arcane aspects of party rules and culture.

The poll was right about the Tories slumping from first to third, but hopeless wrong about the winner — the Liberals captured the seat.

On the question of how much influence the Liberal Democrats have within government, most Conservative and Liberal Democrat supporters think they have a little influence, with Conservatives thinking that is about right or too much, and most Liberal Democrats thinking the party should wield greater influence.

He is considered a rightwinger within the party on some issues, having once supported the death penalty and opposed gay adoption, but willing to work on a cross-party basis with liberals and human rights groups who are concerned about privacy and surveillance.

For those who believe Liz Kendall was over-egging the pudding in saying that Labour has «no God - given right to exist», and that it has earned a permanent place in the British Top Two of political parties, some reading about the Liberal Party in the 1920s is required.