But
liberation theologians pointed out that this was not the case.
Further, Black
liberation theologians pointed out how little the Social Gospel dealt with the oppression of African - Americans.
Liberation theologians pointed out that we were identifying Christian theology with white, male, European theology.
Against sacralism,
liberation theologians point to the many ideological distortions of Christian faith to legitimate dominative power - complexes and value - conflicts in which that faith is used to victimize the poor, women, non-European races, the environment, and the defenseless.
Not exact matches
If it is the task of
liberation theology to speak from the
point of view of the victims of social and economic injustice, what is the appropriate response of those
theologians in the oppressor community who hear and want to support the aspirations of the oppressed?
The question now is whether there is any
point of contact on the side of
liberation theology for the concerns of process
theologians in areas to which
liberation theologians have paid less attention.
One
point of contact between process theology and
liberation theology depends on repentance on the part of process
theologians.
At the same time, he directed some critical comments to the
liberation theologians, thereby underscoring some of the
points made earlier in the conference by Schubert Ogden.
On October 20 - 22,1983, at Xavier University in Cincinnati, however, a group of
liberation and process
theologians came together to discuss
points of convergence as well as areas of residual tension between the two approaches.
As Valpy Fitzgerald and Villa - Vicencio
point out,
liberation theologians (and
liberation economists?)
Quite a number of white male
theologians, while not buying into the more secular demands of
liberation, still want to retain the liberal starting
point of theology developed by Friedrich Schleiermacher as they seek to tie into the
liberation process.
Women
theologians in Latin America are dealing with the issue of women's oppression from the traditional
point of view of
Liberation Theology, i.e., from the perspective of the poor.
Many
liberation theologians, agreeing to this
point with political
theologians, conclude that the church must take sides in political struggles.
Though the curtain of secrecy is drawn over such meetings (one of the abuses that Boff had criticized in his writings), Boff emerged from the encounter smiling, believing that he had made the
point that, when dealing with
liberation theology, the church ought to consult people directly involved in the struggle, rather than relying solely on European
theologians who, as he told reporters, «look on poverty from the outside, from a position of security, in a paternalistic way.»