More generally, the loss of prestige suffered by international socialism after Tiananmen Square, and even more after the «velvet revolution» against socialist oppression in Eastern Europe, brought the «Marxist analysis» on which
liberation theology so heavily depended into universal disrepute.
Not exact matches
I am glad that blacks and women and Latin Americans have, throughout the decade been demanding that
theology be
so formulated as to call for and advance human
liberation.
Indeed, I believe that those few
liberation theologians who have seriously studied process
theology have profited from doing
so.
Though not in the camp of liberal Protestantism, ELCA Lutheranism is
so positioned in the American religious scene as to be deeply affected by all the movements, «
theologies of,» and
liberation forces of the past decades.
It would complicate this paper too much to deal with all the
theologies of
liberation;
so in this paper I shall limit the reference to Latin American
liberation theology.
My interpretation is similar to that of the
so - called
liberation theologies.
Like Sam Keen, Jürgen Moltmann seeks the
liberation of humankind from its modern afflictions, and
so gives a functional cast to his
theology; he too offers a diagnosis of the world's misery, a vision of the world's possibilities, and a prescription for
liberation, i.e., salvation.
The second recent book to advance the response of process
theology to
liberation theology significantly is Delwin Brown's To Set at Liberty.7 This is not
so much a critical response to the challenge of the
liberation theologies as a reflection on freedom stimulated by this literature.
We have had
theologies of
liberation, of women's experience, of Judaism, of culture, of religion, of the body, of worship, of humor, of play, of work, of institutions, of the church, of the world, and
so on, and
so on.
The media was
so busy demonizing the Religious Right that the media shielded attention away from what the Religious Left, probably intentionally given that
Liberation Theology in Central America was often extremely violent.
The status of a strictly metaphysical assertion, taken alone, or only in combination with other strictly metaphysical assertions, is a matter about which black
theology and most other
theologies of
liberation have shown little interest, and this is
so for the best of reasons.
In challenging process
theology to state explicitly that God sides with the oppressed, and to do
so in a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process
theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black
theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for
liberation.
«The unmasking of the false universalism of «women's experience» in the
so - called third wave of Christian feminism has complicated appeals to the «
liberation of women as the goal of feminist
theology,» Pauw says.
«A
theology of
liberation», writes Gustavo Gutierrez, «offers us not
so much a new theme for reflections as a new way to do
theology».
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false»
liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society,
so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith,
so that the notion of truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a
so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
The basic weakness in all forms of
so - called
liberation theology is their overstress on one aspect of the struggle for justice.
It will be not
so much a
theology of
liberation as a
theology of how to build a modern society after
liberation.
(6) Finally, in a
liberation perspective, salvation history and world history are
so linked that
theology critiques the present but also strives to anticipate eschatological reality within history.
That is why
liberation theology is
so attentive to eschatology.
Whitehead, as we have just seen, seems unable to support a revolutionary interpretation and is in consequence not
so immediately» compatible with a
liberation theology in the strict sense.29 Nevertheless, he has a number of important qualifications to address to the standpoint of a revolutionary
theology.
If he had done
so, perhaps American white theologians would not have ignored the black freedom struggle and would have been less hostile toward the rise of black
liberation theology.
1981 — «The Concept of a
Theology of
Liberation: Must a Christian
Theology Today Be
So Conceived?»
So long as the fundamental necessity of praxis is not conceded, there is little hope for appreciation of the thinking which
liberation theology tries to engender.
Just as
liberation theologians have shown that human
liberation can not be considered simply as an additional topic tacked on to an otherwise unchanged
theology,
so also changing the way human beings relate to the natural world can not be simply an additional item on the already overcrowded agenda of the churches.
Among the far - reaching effects of the great antisocialist revolutions of 1989 is one that has
so far not received a proper measure of attention, and that is their impact on Latin American
liberation theology At least one
liberation theologian, observing the collapse of the socialist dream in Eastern Europe, publicly expressed fear that the two estranged parts of «the North,» East and West, would now embrace each other heartily and forget the South.