Sentences with phrase «liberties do»

«The terrorists want to destroy our freedom and when we trash our liberties we do the job for them,» Mr Cameron argued.

In the name of what liberties do they refuse to surrender, except those liberties with which Christ alone has set them free?

Religious liberties don't disappear when cultures become more diverse.

When Tom Paine asked Thomas Jefferson why liberty did not include his slaves, Jefferson replied that his slaves were well treated and happy.

Yet even the most vehement argument put forth by liberty lovers is enfeebled when a liberty does harm to innocent others, as divorce clearly does.

What different view of liberty did he present?

As extensive examples show even in mature democracies, the mere recognition of civil liberties does not protect against various forms of social marginalization and cultural alienation.

Blur is a cold, sad tale of one woman's descent into the abyss of emptiness, and carries the message that liberty doesn't have to be synonymous with complete isolation.

If they kept the game third person but took some of the same liberties they did with Metroid Prime their involvement would be a win win for everyone.

What artistic liberties does this approach provide as compared to doing a biographical movie on the life of Robert F. Kennedy?

The black man or woman in the poem dreams and sings about an «America» («My country tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing») just like white people do; but just singing words about liberty does not necessarily make it so.

After all, how much liberty did I really have in my life if I was practically forced to show up to a job I didn't like for most of my waking hours?

In a dizzying judgment that jumps from analysis of privacy laws to Charter scrutiny, the Ontario Court of Appeal («OCA») unanimously reversed the decision of the SCJ stating the «right to liberty does not include the right to censure accurate information lawfully held.»

Not exact matches

I don't want public attention because I don't want the story to be about me... I want it to be about what the US government is doing... I'm willing to sacrifice all of that because I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building.

That liberty can be difficult to come by at large corporations where the name of the game is to not rock the boat or do anything that might put existing revenue streams at risk.

Sometimes you don't have that liberty to put your career at stake,» she recently told The Indian Express.

Now, however, Silicon Valley's reduced involvement frustrates civil liberties groups because of a widely held view that Section 702 poses a far greater threat to privacy than the telephone program, which did not harvest actual content.

Due to the obvious civil liberty concerns I could never see the CBSA ever doing this, which makes the end user certificate even more pointless since a large portion of it is unenforceable.

«A lot of what we do in the city is fight for local liberty and local control,» Adler said.

Where the power of those instruments needs to be limited, as it surely sometimes does, it can not be done by pulling the rug out from under individual, human liberties.

«The internet is the salvation for those of us who believe in liberty because it is an alternative way of getting around the system not only in the spreading of our ideas in this instance but in in terms of getting around the monetary system on the whole if they do permit crypto - currencies and other forms of transactions.

Look at what they're doing through Obamacare with respect to assaulting the religious liberties of this country.

Matt Slater, chief of staff for New York State Senator Terrence Murphy, a Republican sponsor of the bill, told The New York Times, «It's monumental if we can get this done... we're trying to make sure safety and civil liberties are equally protected.»

The following year, Facebook outraged civil liberties groups with a new privacy policy that gave people less control over their what they could do with their data and made sensitive information like profile pictures, locations, and friend lists publicly available.

Does it not grant more liberty and privacy to citizens?

However, you don't get the liberty of choosing the shortest possible mortgage rate lock, then extending 15 days at a time, as needed.

What I find so incredibly offensive about this is that the LDS community is not only taking liberty with sacred traditions that do not belong to them, but actually prohibiting real Jews from buying the real wine they need for their authentic, Jewish seders.

If they can't conform to standards of equality and non-discrimination, or respecting the liberties of an individual, then I don't want them... we don't need NCOs or Officers or leaders in our armed forces to continue to disgrace the uniform.

Who do you think will protect and defend religious liberties, Obama or Romney??

Mary Ann Glendon asks us to consider «what a set of legal arrangements that places individual liberty or mere lifestyle over innocent life says about, and may do to, the people and the society that produces them.»

(And since we are entering an era in which conservatives may be forced into considering, at all levels of government, the use of more dramatically intransigent constitutional resistance options to various budget - destroying, Constitution - eroding, and religious - liberty threatening trends of liberal «governance,» a Lincoln - like precision about what we intend to do, and about what enormities we are constitutionally obliged to put up with, is all the more necessary.

Note that her core beliefs on liberty, tolerance, and so forth do not seem to have undergone a conversion - just her belief in the existence of a deity.

Do what you can to ensure the most liberty possible for the most people possible.

«Does the American Conservative Union really think the liberties and values they seek to preserve can be maintained when they partner with individuals and organizations that are undermining the understanding that our liberties come from God?

But do we recognize that this Light is that of the Word made flesh, of God made man, that is, of a divinity that does not crush the human, but assumes it in all its liberty and weakness?

You majority Christians cry persecution for someone simply not believing as you do and to dare request the same liberties you enjoy.

Don't forget that our best libertarians, such as Tyler Cowen, have lost confidence in the connection between techno - liberty and fairly egalitarian prosperity.

Liberty under this view does not mean freedom from all restraints; rather, liberty means ordering one's own life — that is, self - government — through reflection and deliberation.

about gas lines justifying DoE, one of our founding fathers said «those who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary security deserve neither».

They believed, as do I, that religion is a culturally restraining force that balances liberty.

Do we need to be a Christian society to sustain religious liberty, as R. R. Reno argues in his splendid Resurrecting the Idea of a Christian Society?

«God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of secondary causes taken away, but rather established.»

It is appropriate to remind us, as Matthew Spalding did in his 2009 book, We Still Hold These Truths, that the Founders would have expected the «perpetuation of liberty» to «depend on spirited citizens... actively engaged in the democratic task of governing themselves» and «holding to the truths of 1776.»

The Westminster Confession of Faith states it this way: «God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of secondary causes taken away, but rather established.

The natural rights principles are central and primary, but they do not capture the broader vision of liberty Americans had from the beginning, let alone the dialogic conflict between various conceptions of liberty that developed over time.

The Westminster Confession of Faith puts it this way: «God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of secondary causes taken away, but rather established.»

What you don't see if the bigger picture, where government is dictating right and wrong and stepping all over our liberties «for the sake of the people».

This Christian humanism has important political and economic ramifications, establishing for Röpke the true foundation of political and economic liberty that modern appeals to mere utility do not provide.

He then zeroes in on several papal teachings having to do with economics and politics which he claims have been reversed: Usury, slavery, religious liberty, and torture.

Our primary goal is to help governments everywhere recognize that their societies will do better with religious liberty than without it.