This narrative seems plausible to many, because we have been deeply shaped and trained to associate the word «liberty» with the freedom of individuals «to pursue their own ends»» requiring, among other things, the liberation of recreational sex from any consequences» and not the rights, privileges, immunities and
liberties of groups, societies, associations, even a corpus mysticum like the Church.
Not exact matches
Now, however, Silicon Valley's reduced involvement frustrates civil
liberties groups because
of a widely held view that Section 702 poses a far greater threat to privacy than the telephone program, which did not harvest actual content.
Liability issues raised by companies and privacy concerns
of civil
liberties groups contributed to the failure to implement such laws.
(Reuters)- A Muslim civil
liberties group said on Wednesday it wants a review
of the death
of a Chechen immigrant linked to the Boston Marathon bombing suspects who was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida.
They have joined civil
liberties groups in demanding more transparency and insisting that information is turned over to the government only when required by law, often in the form
of a court order.
After this story was initially published, David Rocah, an attorney at the ACLU
of Maryland, said the civil
liberties group also would seek a copy
of the proposal.
The bishops are distancing themselves from Catholic
groups that have expressed satisfaction with the «accommodation» offered to them by the president: Sister Carol Keehan
of the Catholic Health Association, for instance, told reporters she was «pleased and grateful that the religious
liberty and conscience protection needs
of so many ministries that serve our country were appreciated enough that an early resolution
of this issue was accomplished.»
In addition to civil rights for people
of color, women and LGBT, there has been an expansion
of religious
liberty for minority sects, enforcement
of viewpoint neutrality with respect to access to various public and non-public forums (e.g. religious student
groups must be granted equal access to school facilities as their secular counterparts, etc) greater protections against age and disability discrimination, and recognition
of habeas corpus rights even for enemy combatants.
You would think it would be a hard sell given the fact that the real estate mogul and reality star has boasted about his extramarital affairs, profited off casinos and strip clubs, said he doesn't need to ask God for forgiveness, called for targeting innocent civilians in war, mocked a reporter with a disability, threatened the religious
liberty of minority
groups in the U.S., and gained wide support among white nationalists for consistently lying about and demeaning blacks, Mexican immigrants, Muslims, and Syrian refugees.
Prominent academics and civil
liberties organizations have raised the prospect
of stripping churches
of their tax exemptions and pursuing litigation to require private companies and civic
groups to be led and staffed by people who pledge allegiance to the moral creed
of the left.
The religious
groups» reasons — that only they can identify a substantial burden on their exercise
of religion and that the government needs to exempt the insurers
of conscientious objectors along with churches and their auxiliaries — actually harm religious
liberty, he argued.
Groups like the Family Research Council continue to characterize religious
liberty and equality for LGBT Americans as an either / or proposition, willfully misrepresenting our nation's historical experience and ignoring the realities
of a nation
of many faiths and beliefs that has dealt with such questions for centuries.
Groups like the Family Research Council, screaming for preservation
of their privilege to discriminate, are not defending
liberty.
, destroy several places that are the only locations hudreds
of thousands
of women can get a general health and wellness check - up done, single out and destroy the civil
liberties of a minority
group of people in America, oh and start a new war.
Thus, if the commands
of one with authority are perceived to lie within what might be called a «circle
of permissibility» recognized by the church (or nation), those demands ought not to be considered infringements
of liberty even if individuals or entire
groups within the church disagree with particular decisions.
If there is any
group of people that should be opposed to war, torture, militarism, the warfare state, state worship, suppression
of civil
liberties, an imperial presidency, blind nationalism, government propaganda, and an aggressive foreign policy it is Christians, and especially conservative, evangelical, and fundamentalist Christians who claim to strictly follow the dictates
of Scripture and worship the Prince
of Peace.
Even today, as countless studies show, greater political activity characterizes those Protestant
groups with the more «republican» religion;
groups asserting «the church should stay out
of politics» are those whose Christianity rests less easy with religious
liberty or the democratic regime generally.
In April 2016, Christian
groups including the Evangelical Alliance said plans for Sunday schools to be forced to register with Ofsted and undergo inspections amounted to an «unjustified restriction
of religious
liberty».
With strong emotion he called us» Americans searching for the roots
of liberty, Eastern Europeans so lately liberated» to the authentic path
of freedom and holiness, centered in the sacrifice
of Christ, and raised the host to unite our
group in a bond far stronger than argument.
Two
groups of prominent religious
liberty scholars (one led by Robin Fretwell Wilson, the other by Douglas Laycock) have written letters (such as this one from Wilson's
group) to state legislators and governors considering same - sex marriage bills, imploring them to include various statutory provisions that would afford some protection to religious freedom.
The separation
of Church and state and the legal recognition
of the principle
of religious
liberty in both nations have led not only to pluralism through the protection
of established religious
groups and the encouragement
of spontaneity and inventiveness; but have also fostered voluntarism in church organization and made the clergy largely dependent on lay support.
But we also need to reacquaint ourselves with our «grand tradition»
of religious
liberty, and with an equally grand tradition
of political conciliation —
of putting the common good
of our nation above the special interests
of whatever
groups we favor.
Religious
liberty has very quickly become
of intense concern for religious
groups across the country, especially for those that will be directly affected by the HHS mandate.
Since my aim is to defend a view dialectically rather than contribute to minutiae
of scholarship, I take the
liberty of combining his writings into an early
group, ending with The Principle
of Relativity, and a later
group, including everything afterwards.
Carl H. Esbeck, an emeritus law professor at the University
of Missouri who gathered the National Association
of Evangelicals, the Assemblies
of God, the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, and other
groups for an amici brief, believes that «specific religious -
liberty protections» will be needed for churches, religious believers, and religious organizations.
If it is true that, bound by the collective interaction
of its
liberties, the human social
group can not escape from certain irreversible laws
of evolution, does this mean that, observed along its axis
of «greatest complexity» (i.e. increasing
liberty) the World is coiling upon itself with as much sureness as it is in other respects radiating outwards and explosively expanding?
Moral Majority and other
groups for what they call «voluntary prayer» in the public schools threatens the religious
liberty of the minority that will oppose prayer in general or particular prayers.
On the other hand, some
groups have been suspicious
of Sabbatarianism so strict that it might seem legalistic («If anywhere the day is made holy for the mere day's sake, then I order you to work on it, to ride on it, to feast on it, to do anything to remove this reproach from Christian
liberty,» Martin Luther declared) or have emphasized, like the Quakers, that all time is holy with God.
A number
of Protestant, Catholic and civil
liberties groups challenged this special nod to one faith, declaring that such recognition jeopardizes the rights
of other churches (and
of individual Catholics) by creating a direct government link with the Vatican.
I am simply saying, without leaving the physical field, that the greatest discovery made in this century is probably the realisation that the passage
of Time may best be measured by the gradual gathering
of Matter in superposed
groups,
of which the arrangement, ever richer and more centralized, radiates outwards from an ever more luminous fringe
of liberty and interiority.
We have become known as a
group of people who sees themselves perpetually under attack, perpetually victimized, and perpetually entitled, a
group who, ironically, often responds to these imagined disadvantages by advancing legislation that restricts the civil
liberties of other people.
Yet the
groups pushing the RFRA want to enact that test into law and leave its interpretation and application to those same «officers
of the government» who have thus far shown no preference for religious
liberty.
Terming the protections
of RFRA as «extreme religious
liberty rights,» the Foundation and associated
groups go beyond even what the Obama administration requests, asserting not only that Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood don't qualify for the law's protections, but rather that RFRA itself is unconstitutional.
One was McIntyre's insistence on total abstinence from alcohol, an issue the Machen
group considered a matter
of Christian
liberty, while the Holiness and pietist traditions had long emphasized the importance
of a Christian life separated from the world» no alcohol, tobacco, dancing, cards, or theater, along with no short skirts or bobbed hair for women.
Take any war, any struggle, or any fight by any nation or any
group of people in the history
of the world, in which their goal was
liberty and freedom, and you will find countless atrocities, murders, and crimes, all committed in the name
of liberty.
Beecher spoke for a vast majority
of the American Protestants when he said that these
groups «constitute a sort
of disciplined moral militia, prepared to act upon every emergency, and repel every encroachment upon the
liberties and morals
of the State.
Rather, they are interested in protecting the security
of their ethnic
group and continue to maintain, often with great vehemence, that eternal religious invisibility in our public places is the «price
of liberty.»
The
group therefore insisted that «the work and mandate
of the committee» set up by the Energy Minister to investigate the scandal continue, adding that «the alleged report at best be considered as one
of the materials that the Committee may consider, and with
liberty, based on evidence that it might recover, to agree or disagree with what is contained in the BNI Report.»
The Liberal Democrats said today's figures highlighted the need to use intercepot eivdence in court - a key proposal
of civil
liberty group Liberty.
An online poll by civil
liberties group Big Brother Watch also suggested that as few as 12 %
of people thought the bill would represent good value for money at a cost
of nearly # 2 billion over ten years.
Today, civil
liberties group Liberty sent a van around the capital attacking the Home Office for the «dog whistle» nature
of the campaign.
Big Brother Watch, a UK civil
liberties pressure
group, said several
of its online services were run via the US, meaning its website fell under US law.
The violation
of this solemn place, the symbol
of our
liberty to have a government by the representatives
of our people for our people by a
group of mobsters and criminals can not simply be ignored.
Furthermore, it is a matter
of religious
liberty that the rights
of religious
groups to perform and recognize these unions not be hampered by civil law.
Confronted by terrorism, drugs and illiberal
groups, how willing and able are the governments
of the Philippines and Indonesia to balance national security prerogatives and popular demands with respect for civil
liberties?
These peers have ignored the rather definitive findings
of a cross party
groups of MPs and peers in 2012, who found a snoopers» charter would disproportionately infringe civil
liberties and be prohibitively expensive.
«There is no more important effort than the protection and expansion
of the rights and
liberties of the people,» said Richard Brodsky, a political scientist at the Wagner Graduate School
of Public Service and a former assemblyman who is working with other
groups supporting a convention.
The move will be a massive relief to civil
liberties groups and privacy campaigners, who had long opposed plans to hand details
of users» internet use to intelligence agencies and police.
«This is
of particular importance when the civil
liberties of minority
groups are threatened, as they are now by the repressive actions being taken by the Trump administration against LGBT people, women, religious and ethnic minorities, and immigrants.»
«Britain has a policing model much admired around the world and the police's political independence is as important as that
of the courts,» civil
liberties group Liberty's director
of policy Isabella Sankey said.