We have become known as a group of people who sees themselves perpetually under attack, perpetually victimized, and perpetually entitled, a group who, ironically, often responds to these imagined disadvantages by advancing legislation that restricts the civil
liberties of other people.
Denial of your own meanness and actively engaged in the efforts to deny
the liberties of others.
you are however free to believe as long as that belief does not interfere with
the liberties of others of this great nation..
There is an incredible need for the world to understand and act to restore
the liberty of others.
When policies do not presume or promote objective values, the resulting moral relativism, instead of leading to a society that is free, fair, just and compassionate, tends instead to produce frustration, despair, selfishness and a disregard for the life and
liberty of others.
The problem is created when someone attempts to use their beliefs to create legislature that limits
the liberties of others.
When a society or a nation tries to direct its course on the basis of aggressive self - interest, denial of the rights and
liberties of others, economic greed, lust for power, race prejudice, vindictiveness, and deception, situations are created which if unchecked lead to war.
US Christians concerned to suppress the civil
liberties of others are agitating in Wisconsin to burn a novel that is sympathetic to the plight of young homosexuals.
Not exact matches
Cook wrote that the government should drop the legal request and instead «form a commission or
other panel
of experts on intelligence, technology, and civil
liberties, to discuss the implications for law enforcement, national security, privacy, and personal freedom.»
«The internet is the salvation for those
of us who believe in
liberty because it is an alternative way
of getting around the system not only in the spreading
of our ideas in this instance but in in terms
of getting around the monetary system on the whole if they do permit crypto - currencies and
other forms
of transactions.
Among
other pronouncements, he says he plans to return the country to its founding principles
of liberty and limited government, should he win the election.
The person who eats 400 pounds
of animal meat every year is treading on the environment for
others, and so a meat tax could be implemented as a matter
of protecting personal
liberty.
Second, the image
of God entails that men must be allowed freedom in their own minds («soul
liberty») from coercion from
other men.
It's quite hard to strike the right balance in our distant appreciation
of the state, but Locke would likely suggest that it's a sign
of poor breeding and inadequate education to complain too vociferously about the constraints on ourselves and
others necessary to preserve our
liberty.
In
other words, his proposal, if it could be executed at all, would produce an individual capable
of using
liberty well and responsibly, inevitably embedded in a society in which most people would be sorely tempted to abuse their
liberty.
However, even with the presence
of Tokes and
other Eastern Europeans, attention to concerns for religious
liberty was minimal.
If you attempt to infringe upon the
liberties and actions
of others because
of your beliefs, I have the obligation to demand that you provide verifiable evidence that your beliefs are based in fact.
The Secretary
of State should rally corporate America and multinational companies to consider religious
liberty along with
other human rights concerns when companies decide where to invest.
Over at Mirror
of Justice, though, Thomas Berg sounds a bit more worried: «a possible lesson here for religious -
liberty advocates (applicable in
other contexts too) is to beware
of pushing the envelope too much.»
Because there is only a small amount
of academic literature on religious freedom (including virtually no mention
of it in the four major academic human rights journals) the State Department should make a short - term commitment to provide seed funds to better understand the linkages between religious freedom, national economics, political development, and
other fundamental
liberties.
and I took the
liberty of chiming in because if a claim has consequences for anyone beside the claimant those
other people have the right to examine the claim and demand evidence for its truthfullness.
On a serious note, it pains me greatly to see our high - ranking government officials pandering to and dancing with these religious perverts and
other enemies
of liberty.
To
other Bloomington residents, the sexual preference amendment signaled a victory for human justice and civil
liberties in keeping with the spirit
of American democracy.
when God sacrifices some interests in favor
of others, it is always for the sake
of promoting the greatest
liberty for all.
There are many variants
of this school
of thought, one
of the best known being John Rawls's conception
of justice as fairness: every person has the maximum freedoms consistent with
others» enjoyment
of the same
liberties; and inequalities are permitted only to the extent that such disparities benefit the most disadvantaged.
And they reduce them to slavery, treating them with afflictions they would scarcely use with brute animals... Therefore, We... noting that the Indians themselves indeed are true men... by our Apostolic Authority decree and declare by these present letters that the same Indians and all
other peoples — even though theyare outside the faith... should not be deprived
of their
liberty or their
other possessions... and are not to be reduced to slavery, and that whatever happens to the contrary is to be considered null and void.»
Legal academics have argued that this sort
of harm strikes at the heart
of the common good, and that judges should count it against the moral and religious
liberty claims
of those seeking to avoid complicity with
others» sins.
Liberals generally are for the killing
of babies and
other horendous ideas that war against the sanctity and
liberty of human beings... Giving men with this kind
of a world view «equal time» isn't what I think God desires.
Some say it allows people to discriminate against gays and lesbians, while
others say it gives people
of faith more
liberty to live out their convictions.
One antecedent to this claim comes in the essays
of Lord Acton on the origins
of the idea
of liberty, and
other antecedents in the political writings
of Jacques Maritain, Thomas....
On some Israeli causes they will find their best allies in dispensational premillennial fundamentalism, while on issues
of civil
liberties and
other causes they will coalesce with moderate - to - liberal Protestants.
Your sense
of liberty and freedom is what I have experienced as well, and so many thousands
of others who are on the same path.
But insofar as liberal freedom is atomistic and precludes the claim
of others on the property that is my person, the state tasked with securing this
liberty will exist to protect me from God's commandments, the demands
of other persons, so - called intermediary institutions, and, ultimately, even nature itself.
The result, as Pierre Manent and
others have observed, is a paradoxical coincidence
of absolutism and libertarianism, indeed an absolutism that grows in proportion to the increase in
liberty.
The orders are also, in the Lutheran view, a school in which all citizens are educated to care for each
other, to do their duties even against their egoistic drives, and to use their «
liberty and ability to achieve civil righteousness,» as Article XVIII
of the Apology
of the Augsburg Confession puts it.
It will insist that any version
of Christian faith that does not grapple with war and peace, human equality, hunger, civil
liberties, the hard decisions posed by medical technology, and a host
of other social challenges is not a version
of faith worth the time
of either pulpit or pew.
According to the Hartshornean understanding
of perfect love, we might interpret the scriptural command — «Be ye perfect» — to mean that we are commanded to act from a social awareness that is perfectly responsive to the interests
of all
others, and for the purpose
of promoting the greatest
liberty for all.
The KGB could restrict Sharansky's diet to bread and water, and could impose a series
of other punitive measures, but it could not alienate him from his fundamental
liberty.
These senators take seriously the sentiment
of George W. Bush's Second Inaugural Address: «The survival
of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success
of liberty in
other lands.
Within that sphere
of liberty the individual has the freedom to express any opinion, to develop any tastes, to live life in his own way — a political philosophy which found its way, through Jefferson and
others, into our Constitution and Bill
of Rights.
According to Hartshornean and to biblical theism, then, what may appear to be God's failure to sympathize with the interests
of the oppressed is never that; and furthermore, when God sacrifices some interests in favor
of other interests, it is always for the sake
of promoting
liberty for all.
Neither religion clause should be subordinated to the
other; each protects an important aspect
of religious
liberty.
The world would take note
of what the gospel makes possible for those who confess their dis - ease with each
other but still keep going, strangers locked in covenant, toward the better country
of diversity and harmony,
liberty and love.
This is not the mere expression
of one's belief while giving
other people the
liberty to live their life as they see fit.
To be sure, the argument that Novak makes is relevant to the Americas south
of the Rio Grande, but it is equally relevant to the experiences
of all
other nations, including those in Eastern Europe, presently engaged in the task
of building institutions
of liberty.
My relatively nonpartisan definition
of JUDICIAL ACTIVISM has to do with an objection to «natural rights» or any
other kind
of «rights /
liberty» jurisprudence — whether it flows from Randy Barnett or Rawls or Hadley Arkes.
I find her willingness to convert even though she questions the catholic church's positions on contraception, hom.ose.xuality, and «
other aspects
of religious
liberty» a little bothersome, and I really hope she's not just caving in to pressure in order to get married.
It shows Washington clasping a walking stick in one hand, with the
other reposing on a bundle
of fasces (the Roman symbol
of republican
liberty).
Should they come to power, all
other religions as well as
other Christian denominations would be disenfranchised, and what kind
of liberty would we have then?
It is the first in the First Amendment, and, many would argue, it is the source
of all
other liberties.