As a result, Paul is the great exponent of the «
liberty of the Christian man.»
Unfortunately, contemporary culture presents us — all too insistently — with issues which require a determined biblical and theological response: the continuation of the abortion regime; the intensifying pressure to acknowledge the legitimacy of same - sex «marriage»; the attacks on the religious
liberty of Christians, forcing them to support practices offensive to their faith; and, most recently, «assisted suicide» now masquerading under the name «the right to die with dignity.»
Not exact matches
The Trump administration has consistently been a champion
of religious
liberty, particularly insofar as it pertains to evangelical
Christian causes.
What a
Christian buys is servitude in this life, at the cost
of his
liberty (and often property), to people who claim to be authorized agents
of God, on hope
of reward that can not be verified until they are dead.
His point is that Union stands for being «followers
of Jesus» and «
Christian unity» and «in essentials unity, in non-essentials
liberty, and in all things charity.»
(Declaration
of Independence, 1776) They laid the foundation
of our civil
liberty and our
Christian nation.
She is joined by a growing list
of musicians who have dabbled with
Christian labels only to find true
liberty in underground grassroots movements.
We can debate the «were a
Christian nation» thing back and forth without getting anywhere, but to imply that the freedoms we have now came only from
Christian roots ignores the rest
of world history as well as the fact that its often been the Church impeding civil
liberties and progressive movements.
Christian Solidarity Worldwide works for the religious
liberty of persecuted
Christians, those suffering repression and children in need.
Do we need to be a
Christian society to sustain religious
liberty, as R. R. Reno argues in his splendid Resurrecting the Idea
of a
Christian Society?
But the argument over the motive for Cochran's firing and its effect on civil and religious
liberties obscures a deeper disagreement over
Christian conceptions
of sin and the consequences
of those ideas in a public work environment.
This
Christian humanism has important political and economic ramifications, establishing for Röpke the true foundation
of political and economic
liberty that modern appeals to mere utility do not provide.
Neither the
christian right nor anyone else can stand in the way
of progress towards full realization
of life,
liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness in this country.
It was founded on the principle
of personal
liberty, which is in stark opposition to
christian doctrine.
It is the hope
of Christians who stand with Muslims in the common cause
of religious
liberty.
Paul addresses a concern
of Christian liberty at the end
of 1 Corinthians 10, when he states, ««I have the right to do anything,» you say — but not everything is beneficial.
Now in this country
of traditional
Christian values, a land which may well lead the world in matters
of justice and
liberty, it is very easy to underestimate the powers
of evil.
Finally,
Christians might engage in the cause
of religious
liberty with more hope and less anxiety.
«Every country, including the US, should be included in global assessments
of religious
liberty or persecution
of Christians.
This election serves as a reminder that the
Christian mandate
of controlling women's bodies, telling gay people they're evil and can't access our
liberties, or that the future is something to be feared are not relevant in politics.
It will insist that any version
of Christian faith that does not grapple with war and peace, human equality, hunger, civil
liberties, the hard decisions posed by medical technology, and a host
of other social challenges is not a version
of faith worth the time
of either pulpit or pew.
Americans, for their part, should appreciate how much the Jewish and
Christian traditions have provided the vision and context for creating and maintaining a society
of ordered
liberty.
For example, in 1923 Mullins, the champion
of «soul
liberty,» outlined various basic
Christian beliefs (e.g., biblical inspiration, the miracles
of Christ, his vicarious atonement, bodily resurrection, literal ascension, and final return) and declared before the SBC: «We believe that adherence to the above truths and facts is a necessary condition
of service for teachers in our Baptist schools.»
The Epistle to the Galatians is a great declaration
of Christian liberty.
Sexual exploitation
of the unborn, the new born and youth
of both sexes, together with the fact that even free men and women were expected to marry (usually arranged) and bear and rear children as a duty to empire and family, meant for many
Christians that the only route to personal
liberty led through the «freedom»
of celibacy.
In the forthcoming Victories
of Reason, Stark will attribute to
Christian rationality and advocacy nothing less than the emergence
of capitalism (pioneered by medieval monks, not industrious Protestants) and the foundational principles
of equality and individual
liberty that informed that most conspicuous Western achievement
of all: modern republican democracy.
After the happy honeymoon she will receive for living down to a cheesey
Christian conversion stereotype, she is going to find some ugly things about how Catholics respond to her «questions (about) certain aspects
of Catholicism, including the church's positions on homosexuality, contraception and some aspects
of religious
liberty.»
Should they come to power, all other religions as well as other
Christian denominations would be disenfranchised, and what kind
of liberty would we have then?
So high is this God's valuation
of human
liberty of conscience that, even though He has launched a divinely commissioned religion in history (in two Covenants, Jewish and
Christian), He would not have either
of these religions imposed by force on anyone.
As a result, we should allow for a range
of opinions, affirming our areas
of agreement (e.g., that a vote is a gift to be stewarded) and recognizing
Christian liberty in areas
of disagreement (How should we weigh the personal conduct
of one candidate against that
of another?
Only the Jewish and
Christian God made human beings free, halts the power
of Caesar at the boundaries
of the human soul, and has commissioned human beings to build civilizations worthy
of the
liberty He has endowed in them.
Christian liberty implies that reasonable and faithful
Christians will disagree about issues situated farther away from the core
of biblical teaching.
Thirdly, the attributes
of the people
of God (its
liberty, righteousness, holiness and glory) do not belong primarily or
of right either to individual
Christians, or to the sum
of all
Christians at any one moment, or even to the whole
of redeemed humanity in all ages.
William Penn
of the Society
of Friends first established religious
liberty in the colonies and supplied the
Christian rationale for it.
My opposition to this dichotomy is twofold: I believe that he has failed to account for the elements
of our economy that should be particularly troubling to his fellow
Christians, and that his model
of the virtues necessary to maintain
liberty neglects those with which we might combat these abuses.
And in the next place, describing what properly is defiance, it teaches that a man does wrong although he understands what is right, or forbears to do right although he understands what is right; in short, the
Christian doctrine
of sin is pure impertinence against man, accusation upon accusation; it is the charge which the Deity as prosecutor takes the
liberty of lodging against man.
If there is any group
of people that should be opposed to war, torture, militarism, the warfare state, state worship, suppression
of civil
liberties, an imperial presidency, blind nationalism, government propaganda, and an aggressive foreign policy it is
Christians, and especially conservative, evangelical, and fundamentalist
Christians who claim to strictly follow the dictates
of Scripture and worship the Prince
of Peace.
It is as if Paul was a split - person, unable to resolve his conflicts
of sexism and
Christian liberty in a consistent manner.12
Long before the founding
of Christian public interest law firms, such as the Liberty Fund, The Becket Fund, and the ACLJ [American Center for Law and Justice], the Jehovah's Witnesses were using the courts to establish
liberties.
Gregg Shively... the idea
of a «stumbling block» is addressed to
Christians who felt at
liberty to eat food sacrificed to idols (1 Corinthians 8) and was not addressed to «outsiders».
In April 2016,
Christian groups including the Evangelical Alliance said plans for Sunday schools to be forced to register with Ofsted and undergo inspections amounted to an «unjustified restriction
of religious
liberty».
Even with the present democratic and
Christian emphasis on the dignity
of personality and concern for «
liberty and justice for all,» we are still far from agreement as to what constitutes for every man «his due.»
Do not great
Christian nations, founded upon the rule
of law and
liberty, benefit the world in which they exist?
The objections to fasting — the resistance
of the flesh and «evangelical
liberty» — must not deter one from fasting as a form
of discipline.31 When the
Christian has failed in obedience, is guilty
of sin against others, has lost the joy
of Christian grace, and has come to little or no prayer, he needs to fast and pray.
They assumed that the Constitution, a distillation
of Christian principles (life,
liberty, etc.), would be interpreted in the light
of the Judeo -
Christian tradition, to which even the Deists and free - thinkers among them owed their conception
of ethics [pp. 62 - 63].
That is why the moral essence
of the US that men have inalienable rights to life,
liberty and the pursuit
of happiness is diametrically opposite
of the selfless, self - sacrificial
Christian morality.
The pope's decision to retire, rooted in this genuine concept
of Christian liberty, is widely said to have «shocked the world,» and even much
of the Church.
Beyond the issue
of civil
liberties lies a more prosaic political point: the possibility for a greater alliance between African - American
Christians and white evangelicals.
Since the
Christian's ultimate loyalty is to God and not the state in its demand for obedience to the law, the
Christian always tempers his loyalty with insistences on justice with love that calls for an equality and
liberty that holds the state's necessary powers
of coercion under restraint and accountability to God.
«I deem the present occasion sufficiently important and solemn to justify me in expressing to my fellow - citizens a profound reverence for the
Christian religion and a thorough conviction that sound morals, religious
liberty, and a just sense
of religious responsibility are essentially connected with all true and lasting happiness...»