Any totalitarian program for the state was declared to be hostile to the liberty of the church and, what is more, hostile to
the liberty of human personality.
But we require a fresh understanding of what truth is and how it is related to
the liberty of the human agent.
In truth, however, like Aquinas, Kant could have had it both ways, postulating a divine perceptor who would not displace but rather sustain, enlarge, and explain
the liberty of the human self.
Liberals generally are for the killing of babies and other horendous ideas that war against the sanctity and
liberty of human beings... Giving men with this kind of a world view «equal time» isn't what I think God desires.
Not exact matches
Where the power
of those instruments needs to be limited, as it surely sometimes does, it can not be done by pulling the rug out from under individual,
human liberties.
OPEN Festival is a regional festival dedicated to the promotion
of ideas
of liberty and
human rights.
Featured The Satoshi Revolution: A Revolution
of Rising Expectations.Section 2: The Moral Imperative
of PrivacyChapter 6: Privacy is a Prerequisite
of Human Rights Privacy is the Virtue that Sparked the American Revolution, Chapter 6, Segment 2 A general dissolution
of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the
liberties of America than the whole force
of the common enemy.
In «A Tale
of Two Popes» and «Papal Eco-Hysteria», we have contrasted Francis and John Paul II and quoted from the latter's seminal encyclical «Centesimus Annus», which probably contains the most clear - headed thinking on
human liberty and economics that has ever emerged from the Vatican.
Bold and convincing, Adams has reminded me
of the grand ideals that this nation was founded on —
liberty, justice, and
human flourishing.
The Secretary
of State should rally corporate America and multinational companies to consider religious
liberty along with other
human rights concerns when companies decide where to invest.
But do we recognize that this Light is that
of the Word made flesh,
of God made man, that is,
of a divinity that does not crush the
human, but assumes it in all its
liberty and weakness?
Because there is only a small amount
of academic literature on religious freedom (including virtually no mention
of it in the four major academic
human rights journals) the State Department should make a short - term commitment to provide seed funds to better understand the linkages between religious freedom, national economics, political development, and other fundamental
liberties.
There are a number
of organisations that specialise in promoting
human rights and religious
liberty, three
of whom contribute to this column inChristianity:
Let us not underestimate the role
of the international
human rights project in training a spotlight on the appalling violations
of human life,
liberty, and dignity that occur every day in many parts
of the world.
But we have dramatically reduced poverty, shown ways to build institutions that respect
human rights and
liberties, virtually eliminated famines, found ways to prevent and remedy diseases, dramatically increased the longevity
of people everywhere, and come to include more and more persons in the «circle
of exchange.»
To other Bloomington residents, the sexual preference amendment signaled a victory for
human justice and civil
liberties in keeping with the spirit
of American democracy.
This «moral reading»
of the Constitution calls on judges to act as moral philosophers: «equal protection
of the laws» should mean what best promotes «equal concern and respect» for all
humans; «
liberty» in the «due process» clause should mean autonomy in matters important to personal development, and so forth.
God» not government» is the only sure guarantee
of human rights and the blessings
of our
liberty.
Since political principles identify the proper relations between
humans, and since these relations are not constitutive
of happiness, freedom has meant the absence
of authority or coercion, i.e., the
liberty to pursue happiness without
human interference.
It translates Christianity's revolutionary egalitarianism into «the doctrines
of liberty, fraternity and
human rights».
In 1992, in the Casey opinion which confirmed America's unlimited abortion licence, Kennedy wrote that «at the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the mystery
of human life»....
It describes a duty
of society to retreat and give its members space to act on what they deem essential; an acknowledgment not
of a
human liberty or right, but
of a
human obligation that precedes the social obligation and so shapes it.
«By its
liberty, the
human person transcends the stars and all the world
of nature,» Jacques Maritain once wrote.
In both Lev 25:44 - 46 and antebellum chattel slavery, the principle immorality is the reduction
of a
human being to mere property and the corresponding deprivation
of liberty.
If we win the political struggle, we will not even know what we want unless we have a new vision
of man, a new sense
of human possibility, and a new conception
of the ordering
of liberty, the constitution
of freedom.
When in the course
of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers
of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws
of Nature and
of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions
of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation — We hold these truths to be self - evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life,
liberty and the pursuit
of happiness.
He has waged cruel war against
human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights
of life and
liberty in the persons
of a distant people, who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither.14
We live in an age whose chief moral value has been determined, by overwhelming consensus, to be the absolute
liberty of personal volition, the power
of each
of us to choose what he or she believes, wants, needs, or must possess; our culturally most persuasive models
of human freedom are unambiguously voluntarist and, in a rather debased and degraded way, Promethean; the will, we believe, is sovereign because unpremised, free because spontaneous, and this is the highest good.
The signatories declared themselves to be in solidarity in their unequivocal support
of the dignity and right to life
of every
human person, marriage between a man and a woman as divinely ordained and the foundation
of civil society, and religious
liberty as an essential component
of human freedom.
Even Lewis Hanke, twentieth - century doyen
of Latin American studies, made the sermon into a Bolivarian grito de libertad, «the first cry on behalf
of human liberty in the New World.»
For freedom Christ has set us free; stand fast, therefore, and do not submit again to the yoke
of slavery (Gal 5:1): Sin is a weakening
of liberty, not an expression
of human freedom.
It will insist that any version
of Christian faith that does not grapple with war and peace,
human equality, hunger, civil
liberties, the hard decisions posed by medical technology, and a host
of other social challenges is not a version
of faith worth the time
of either pulpit or pew.
There is a basic incompatibility between Islam's belief in all encompassing doctrines that embrace religion, private and public life and the American principles
of liberty of belief and speech and the absolute separation
of state and church affairs For Americans belief is a private matter, not so for Islam, where theocracy rules over all
human affairs.
Though both the conception
of human liberty and the virtues necessary to its true exercise sprang from biblical teachings, the framers were careful not to endow biblical religion, or any religion, with state power.
Justice involves the promotion
of economic equity, political participation, and personal
liberties among and between
humans.
If the framers
of the Constitution had been more morally courageous in identifying slavery as an evil, or if the later compensatory amendment had rooted
liberty in a common
human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds
of equality under the law, then perhaps the expansion
of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridently.
Consequently, the world that was meant to be a great
human family «with
liberty and justice for all» is the scene not only
of injustice, tyranny, and heartache, but
of bitter strife that may engulf us all.
Because the individual
human subject» Leff's godlet» is the modernist starting point, it seems reasonable to place a heavy burden
of justification upon anyone who seeks to restrain the
liberty of that subject.
The American novus ordo, with its revolutionary form
of social life — the voluntary association — demonstrates that ordered
liberty and
human rights are products
of social arrangements that give primacy to both persons and communities.
In the forthcoming Victories
of Reason he will go even further, contending that the most significant advances in knowledge,
liberty,
human rights and material well - being — what we like to call progress — stem not from Greece or the Enlightenment or modernity but from Christianity itself.
Alone among the religions
of the world, Judaism and Christianity place so high a valuation upon religious
liberty because
of their own doctrine that the relation God seeks with
humans is friendship.
So high is this God's valuation
of human liberty of conscience that, even though He has launched a divinely commissioned religion in history (in two Covenants, Jewish and Christian), He would not have either
of these religions imposed by force on anyone.
Only the Jewish and Christian God made
human beings free, halts the power
of Caesar at the boundaries
of the
human soul, and has commissioned
human beings to build civilizations worthy
of the
liberty He has endowed in them.
This is not to say that we can not come to impassioned, principled positions about how to vote, particularly when dealing with issues as important as sexual assault, bigotry, racism, responsible foreign policy, religious
liberty, and the dignity
of human life at every stage in its development.
When the self is committed to the Second Good, its stock
of memory, intelligence, relationships, health, and wealth becomes the instrument for the concrete achievement
of security, justice,
liberty, or fraternity within the domain
of personal relations and in the larger world
of human institutions.
These two revolutions in the understanding
of human nature and society constitute «liberalism» inasmuch as they introduce a radically new definition
of «
liberty.»
If I am right, however, a reconsideration
of liberalism's two main commitments will not compromise but instead be the preconditions for securing equal
human dignity and ordered
liberty.
Its two revolutions — its anthropological individualism and the voluntarist conception
of choice, and its insistence on the
human separation from and opposition to nature — created its distinctive and new understanding
of liberty as the most extensive possible expansion
of the
human sphere
of autonomous activity in the service
of the fulfillment
of the self.
Anarchy and license are not the kind
of liberty in which
human life is fulfilled.
Croce appropriately called history «the story
of liberty,» thus intimating that freedom is the clue to the whole course
of human existence.