Sentences with phrase «liberty of others»

We have become known as a group of people who sees themselves perpetually under attack, perpetually victimized, and perpetually entitled, a group who, ironically, often responds to these imagined disadvantages by advancing legislation that restricts the civil liberties of other people.

We kill the creativity and liberty of others by scaring them into conforming to our creeds and doctrinal statements.

Physically abusing, harassing, intimidating, striking, or interfering with the personal liberty of the other party or their children

@Russ: If you base your right to infringe on the liberties of others because of your «beliefs», I am now obligated to demand that you provide verifiable evidence that supports your claims about your god.

you are however free to believe as long as that belief does not interfere with the liberties of others of this great nation..

There is an incredible need for the world to understand and act to restore the liberty of others.

When someones beliefs cause them to act in a way that infringes upon the liberties of others or cause others harm, I am now obligated to demand that they provide evidencial support for their beliefs.

When policies do not presume or promote objective values, the resulting moral relativism, instead of leading to a society that is free, fair, just and compassionate, tends instead to produce frustration, despair, selfishness and a disregard for the life and liberty of others.

The problem is created when someone attempts to use their beliefs to create legislature that limits the liberties of others.

When a society or a nation tries to direct its course on the basis of aggressive self - interest, denial of the rights and liberties of others, economic greed, lust for power, race prejudice, vindictiveness, and deception, situations are created which if unchecked lead to war.

As Ignatieff summarizes Berlin's argument, the primary purpose of a liberal political community is to create the public circumstances in which men and women are left alone «to do what they want, provided that their actions [do] not interfere with the liberty of others.»

The burden of proof is on those who would oppose this, and they must demonstrate why or how a particular act impinges upon the liberty of others in some way, in order for the act to be opposed (Gaus & Courtland, 2011).

At Bench Conference, Andrew Cohen argues that Seidlin's performance was so unseemly and inappropriate «that the Florida bar ought to immediately launch an investigation into whether he is truly fit to determine the rights and liberties of others.»